Saturday, November 22, 2014

The Irrawaddy Magazine

The Irrawaddy Magazine


Old Ways of the Future

Posted: 21 Nov 2014 05:00 PM PST

Kayin villagers practice an eight-year crop-rotation cycle that avoids the soil erosion, nutrient depletion and ecosystem damage that result from more intensive use of the land. (Photo courtesy of KESAN)

Kayin villagers practice an eight-year crop-rotation cycle that avoids the soil erosion, nutrient depletion and ecosystem damage that result from more intensive use of the land. (Photo courtesy of KESAN)

YANGON — As climate change becomes a growing global concern, the quest for new ways to use land resources more sustainably is gaining in urgency. What many researchers are discovering, however, is that some of the best answers can be found in practices that have existed for centuries.

This was the conclusion of a June report from the Indigenous Knowledge and Peoples Network (IKAP), based in Chiang Mai, Thailand. Based on a study of the farming and forestry techniques practiced among some ethnic Kayin in northern Thailand, the report documents a way of life that is helping to mitigate climate change, reduce soil erosion and protect biodiversity.

For many in Thailand and other parts of Asia, these findings fly in the face of conventional wisdom, which has long characterized "hill tribes" as poor stewards of increasingly scarce resources. In particular, the slash-and-burn method of clearing land for cultivation practiced in many remote regions has been blamed for releasing vast quantities of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and producing a sometimes deadly haze that afflicts urban centers and less-populated areas alike.

What the IKAP report found, however, is that traditional practices, rooted in the Buddhist and animist beliefs of Kayin residents of the village of Ban Mae Lan Kham in northern Thailand's Chiang Mai Province, are often ideally suited to ensuring the long-term preservation of forests, while also providing sustainable livelihoods.

Among the customs that the report highlights are rotational farming, the protection of forests situated between mountains to "aid the journeys of spiritual beings," and the sparing from the ax of trees wrapped with the umbilical cords of newborns (the latter practice is said to protect the offspring for whom the umbilical cords once served as lifelines). Areas that house ancient ruins are also left undisturbed, as are burial grounds and other spaces considered sacred.

For the 658 Pgaz K'Nyau, or Kayin, inhabitants of Ban Mae Lan Kham studied in the report, these Taj Duf, or constraining rules, serve to "guide the people's every life practice in utilizing or taking care of the ecological system in suitable and balanced ways."

The report, based on research conducted from October 2012 to October 2013 in a village tract that covers an area of about 3,100 hectares, finds that these traditions "have proven to be sustainable and in line with climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies even though communities are not aware or conscious of 'climate change' causes and effects."

A centerpiece of these sustainable land management practices is an eight-year crop-rotation cycle that avoids the soil erosion, nutrient depletion and ecosystem damage that result from more intensive use of the land.

Although slash-and-burn is still a part of this cycle, the study found that the Kayin system maintains the balance between carbon storage and carbon emissions, and also has an added advantage: By giving trees a chance to grow large enough that the timber can be harvested for construction purposes, villagers are able to profit from their conservation.

Indigenous people's traditional forest knowledge is increasingly viewed as one front in the battle to reduce carbon emissions on a warming planet. A 2007 report from the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change found that indigenous knowledge is "an invaluable basis for developing adaptation and natural resource management strategies in response to environmental and other forms of change."

Could Myanmar also benefit from the wisdom of its indigenous approaches to land use? That depends.

According to Saw Paul Sein Twa, director of the Thailand-based Karen Environmental and Social Action Network (KESAN), many of the values held by the Kayin studied in the IKAP report are shared by their ethnic brethren on the Myanmar side of the border.

"The beliefs are the same because culturally we are attached," he said, adding that recognition of customary land tenure rights was essential to the survival of traditional Kayin agroforestry practices.

"Without that, surely there will be big problems in the near future. I don't know how well [Myanmar's] reforms will go, but we can see that more and more development projects and government expansion of its administrative areas is really competing for land with local communities."

This article first appeared in the November 2014 print edition of The Irrawaddy magazine.

The post Old Ways of the Future appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

The Irrawaddy Business Roundup (Nov. 22, 2014)

Posted: 21 Nov 2014 04:00 PM PST

Central Burma Will Be 'Revitalized' by Chinese Economic Corridor

Beijing has renewed its enthusiasm for an economic corridor linking India, Bangladesh and Burma with southwest China.

It would "spark a major expansion in infrastructure development which will revitalize the economies involved," the official China Daily newspaper reported.

"Linking India's northeast, Bangladesh, [Burma] and the Chinese province of Yunnan, the corridor will lead to major socioeconomic development and will provide a massive boost to trade in South Asia," the daily said.

The corridor idea was discussed in private talks with President Thein Sein during Chinese Premier Li Keqiang's visit to Naypyidaw for the Asean Summit last week.

"China is willing to work with [Burma] in building the corridor to promote connectivity and regional prosperity," Li was quoted by China Daily as saying.

The "corridor" is envisaged to extend from Kunming, capital of China's Yunnan province, to Kolkata in India, and would include Mandalay in central Burma as well as Dhaka and Chittagong in Bangladesh.

However, India remains wary of opening up its hinterland to Chinese influence.

Shanghai Institute for International Studies analyst Wang Weihua said China should first focus on cooperation with Burma and Bangladesh.

"Given India's unclear attitude on whether or not they will allow Chinese investment in the northeast, what we could do now is to concentrate on transport links to improve connectivity with [Burma] and Bangladesh," Wang told China Daily.

French Cement Giant Expands in Burma but Still No Production

One of the world's biggest construction materials manufacturers, Lafarge of France, has opened a storage and repacking factory in the Thilawa special economic zone (SEZ).

The facility is a joint venture with two local firms, Aung Myin Thu and My Associates, Myanmar Business Network said.

Lafarge at present still imports cement and about 20,000 tons can be stored at the factory before repacking and distribution within Burma, but there are plans to expand into local production to meet a construction boom, Aung Myin Thu said.

The Paris-based firm has been trading in Burma since 1999 through local subsidiary Thilawa Cement and Building Materials Company.

"We mainly import cement in bulk from Lafarge plants in the region and process the product at our Thilawa terminal. The cement is discharged, stored, and packed in Thilawa and finally distributed through our Lafarge truck fleet," the company said on its website.

Another Two Years Before Bagan Can Achieve World Heritage Status

Burma's biggest foreign tourism attraction, Bagan, must wait more than two years before it can qualify for a UN World Heritage listing.

Plans for protecting and maintaining the ancient city's remains, which include thousands of pagoda artefacts, and drawing up a full inventory of monuments, must be prepared first, Burma's Ministry of Culture said.

The requirements were made known when inspectors from the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco) met Naypyidaw government officials, the Myanmar Times reported.

Preparations for World Heritage status will be helped by archaeological specialists from Japan and Italy, the paper said, quoting the ministry.

There are about 1,000 World Heritage listings worldwide, and some qualify for funding to help maintain them.

Tourism has become a major industry in the last two years and the number of foreigners visiting Bagan is expected to rise dramatically as the government plans for 5 million tourists arriving in Burma per year by the end of 2015.

Preparations for a World Heritage site listing will take about two-and-a-half years, the deputy director general of the Department of Archaeology, Thein Lwin, told the Times.

Boeing Signs Supply Agreement With Another Burmese Airline

Air Mandalay is to buy or lease Boeing 737 aircraft to expand its passenger capacity.

"Boeing will assist Air Mandalay with its efforts to procure Next-Generation 737 planes through leasing channels to support Air Mandalay's expansion plan," regional travel magazine TTR Weekly said.

At present the airline, which flies mostly within Burma, uses ATR 72-212 and ATR 42-320 planes.

"[Burma] is looking to position itself as a major tourism destination capable of handling an increasing number of foreign visitors. The 737s will provide us with capabilities to support this critical national growth strategy," chief executive Adam Htoon said in a statement.

Earlier this year Myanma Airways signed an agreement with General Electric Capital Aviation Services to lease 10 Boeing 737s. The first of these aircraft is due to be delivered in June next year, and the last one by 2020.

Cross-Border Trade With China at Muse on Upward Spiral

The value of trade across Burma's border crossing with China at Muse between April and mid-November this financial year totalled US$2.9 billion, a report said.

The bulk of the trade value, $2 billion, was Burmese goods going to China, the Directorate of Commerce and Consumers' Affairs was quoted by Eleven Media as saying.

The total value is more than $650 million higher than for the same period of the 2013-14 financial year.

Burma's exports are mostly agricultural, ranging from rice to rubber, while imports from China include motorcycles, fertilizers and construction materials.

A jade and jewelry market is being built at Muse in cooperation with the Chinese town of Ruili opposite and is due to open in 2015 as part of an economic zone that will include hotels, offices, market areas and the region's biggest bus station, China's Xinhua news agency said.

The post The Irrawaddy Business Roundup (Nov. 22, 2014) appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Democratic Voice of Burma

Democratic Voice of Burma


DVB Roadshow: The mystery of the Kyatgu caves

Posted: 21 Nov 2014 10:19 PM PST

On the second episode of DVB’s Doh Pyay Doh Myay Roadshow, the team visits mountainous Karenni State.

The team explores the capital, Loikaw, and the surrounding mountains, home to rebel armies, opium growers— and the supernatural.

 

Burma shies from its nuclear protocol responsibilities again

Posted: 21 Nov 2014 05:15 PM PST

Anniversaries come and go.  Another one has been passed in Burma –  it’s over one year since Burma signed the Additional Protocol to its Nuclear Safeguards Agreement with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).  In September 2013 Burma signed this agreement, which would have opened its nuclear facilities to full inspection by the IAEA.  The move was greeted with great fanfare.  The signing was hailed as proof that Burma was ready at last to cooperate in opening its nuclear activities to inspection. In 1995 Burma signed an agreement with the IAEA that it had nothing to declare about nuclear activities. So from 1995 to 2013 the IAEA performed no nuclear safeguards inspections.

The Additional Protocol vacates the old claim that Burma had nothing to declare; Burma would have to agree to inspections of declared activity as well as answer questions about suspicious activities. But none of this takes effect until Burma ratifies the new Additional Protocol. Fourteen months later, this still has not happened. And inspections are still on hold. The Burmese representative to the IAEA obliquely referred to this failure in September 2014, on the first anniversary of the signing.  His convoluted explanation was:

It gives me great pleasure to recall that during the 57th General Conference [of the IAEA] meeting in Vienna, Myanmar signed the Additional Protocol to IAEA safeguards-agreement. Ongoing efforts are intensified to ratify this Additional Protocol.  Myanmar, for its part, has taken further steps to strengthen its national legal framework and setup national implementation team for State System of Accounting and Control of Nuclear materials.

In other words, ratification is still pending, no inspections have taken place, and suspicious activities have not been resolved. The one action that can be quantified is that there will be a system for accounting for nuclear materials that Burma has denied having since 1995. Once the new Additional Protocol is finally ratified, Burma simply needs to restate that it has no nuclear materials and there will be no basis for verification inspections. IAEA reports on its website that it has provided training in nuclear material accountancy for a country that has declared it has no nuclear materials. But there are no signs of aggressive negotiations to visit all the sites where suspicious activities have taken place.  The process of building up a nuclear accountancy department in Myanmar can take years and can result in exactly no progress. In the meantime, Burma has been praised for signing the document and critics have turned away, glad to forget nuclear allegations and to move on to other problems.

Burma has a proven track record in this regard. It has signed the Chemical Weapons Convention back in 1993 and not gotten around to ratification. Similarly, Burma signed the Biological and Toxin Weapons in Convention in 1972, but has not ratified. And in the nuclear field, Burma signed the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty in 1996 but has not ratified it. Not that anyone thinks Burma is going to test a nuclear bomb, simply that Burma has a long history of silencing criticism by signing agreements that it then fails to ratify.

Other ASEAN member states are also very slow to ratify the treaties they sign. With respect to IAEA's Additional Protocol, the Philippines signed but took over 12 years to ratify. Malaysia and Thailand are still pondering ratifying their signatures after nine years. Significantly, Burma, Malaysia and Thailand all signed their intent to adhere to the Additional Protocol in the month of September, at the time of the IAEA General Conference. This is a time when bold moves will be noticed and be accompanied by photo opportunities and news releases coincident with that important event. But when the cameras are put away, good intentions disappear.

A significant exception to this process is India. In July 2014, India was identified as a state that had not followed through on its pledge to ratify the Additional Protocol it signed in 2009. India is in a special situation, outside the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty but possessing nuclear weapons. In the interest of removing trade sanctions and possibly joining the Nuclear Suppliers Group, India was shamed into quickly ratifying the treaty. India is a special case, however. Ratification is done by the executive and not the legislature, so it requires only a simple stroke of the pen. And India had just elected a new government that needs nuclear trade and realised the non-ratification of the Additional Protocol was a tremendous barrier.

Burma is a master of misdirection, giving the political world meaningless concessions that it does not intend to ratify. It is unfortunate that in the political world this usually works. Bureaucracies excel at making gestures and then quietly letting the solution languish until all is forgotten. The IAEA, ASEAN, OPCW and other interested communities need to maintain pressure on Burma to follow through on its promise to ratify. Otherwise more and more anniversaries will come and go with no progress.

 

Robert Kelley is a former Los Alamos weapons scientist, and was an IAEA director from 1992 to 1993, and again from 2001 to 2005. He has conducted weapons inspections in Libya, Iraq, and South Africa, and compliance inspections in Egypt, Turkey, South Korea, Taiwan, Syria, Tanzania, Pakistan, India and Congo, among others.

The views expressed in this article are the author's and do not reflect DVB editorial policy.