Monday, September 19, 2016

The Irrawaddy Magazine

The Irrawaddy Magazine


Rangoon Family Who ‘Enslaved’ Girls for Years Settle Case for $4,000

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 09:38 AM PDT

 Scars are visible on the arm and hand of Ma San Kay Khaing, who escaped from five years in domestic servitude in Rangoon's Kyauktada Township. (Photo: Lawi Weng / The Irrawaddy)

Scars are visible on the arm and hand of Ma San Kay Khaing, who escaped from five years in domestic servitude in Rangoon's Kyauktada Township. (Photo: Lawi Weng / The Irrawaddy)

Scars on their arms, fingers, neck, face and feet illustrate how two teenaged girls were tortured for five years while being forced into domestic servitude in a downtown Rangoon household in Kyauktada Township.

Ma San Kay Khaing, 17, and Ma Tha Zin, 16, escaped their abusers on Sept. 5, they told The Irrawaddy, where they said they were treated like "slaves." Ma San Kay Khaing was just 11 years old when she began to work for the family, and identified her abuser as one of the family's daughters, Ma Su Mon Latt.

"She beat me a lot, almost every day. First, she beat me on my feet. When I could not finish my work at night, and I fell asleep, then she stabbed me with scissors in my arm. She stabbed me in my back, and in my neck. The louder I cried, the more she tortured me," said San Kay Khaing.

She reported working through the night and being allowed to sleep from 6:00 a.m. until noon, before being forced to return to her work, which included taking care of a baby and washing all of the family's clothes. She was locked in the house and paid just 15,000 kyat per month (US$12).

Ma Tha Zin was employed by the same family's grandmother, Daw Tin Thuzar. She worked in a six-floor tailoring factory, called Ava. The two victims were friends, both hailing from Bawlonekwin village in Rangoon's Kawhmu Township.

Referring to her abuser as "Grandma," Ma Tha Zin said that the woman used a small pair of scissors to hurt her, although a scar on Tha Zin's nose marks an occasion where the grandmother hit her in the face with a knife.

"Whenever she felt I did not wash the clothes properly, or did not cook well, then she beat me," she said.

Ma Tha Zin said she only was given one meal per day, once all of her work was completed, and sometimes the meal consisted only of rice. She said that she slept with only one blanket and no pillow or mosquito net.

"Mosquitos bit me a lot while I slept. I spent 5 years like this," Ma Tha Zin said.

The girls said that the family regularly paid them their monthly salary for the first two years of their employment, before cutting off communication with the girls' families. After that point, for the next three years, whenever the families would phone and ask to meet their daughters, the employers said the girls had left.

"We called [the family] on the phone and asked them to let us see our children, but they told us that our children were not at home, and that they had just gone somewhere else," said San Kay Khaing's mother, Daw Nyo Nyo Win. "We went there, but we could not see our children."

Two weeks ago, San Kay Khaing's mother said that the Dala Township police station notified her of her daughter's whereabouts, and asked her to pick her up.

"I was so happy to get my daughter back, but I cannot even think about compensation for how she has been tortured," she said.

The Investigation

On Sept. 15, the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission (MNHRC) called the parents of the two young victims to meet the abusers at their office.

The MNHRC also invited Swe Win, the chief correspondent from the Myanmar Now news agency. He initially filed charges at the Kyauktada Township police station regarding the case three months earlier, after a member within the family notified him about the abuse of the girls and asked for help in rescuing them. When the police failed to take action, he said, he contacted the MNHRC.

"I told the commission about the rights abuse, but the police did not take action, even though I filed charges," Swe Win said.

The MNHRC pushed for an investigation, which was led by Col U Than Aye.

U Than Aye said that the family keeping the girls had not allowed him to talk to them privately.

"I had suspicions at that time about the abuse of the two girls when I saw their appearance. I tried to investigate, but I could not do it," he said.

The police issued a brief statement saying that Ma San Kay Khaing and Ma Tha Zin were exploited, tortured and treated like slaves. The statement suggested that legal action be taken based by the families of the victims or Swe Win, who originally filed charges.

Compensation

Swe Win said that the police and the MNHRC had recommended that the victims' families accept monetary compensation for the crime, since a legal fight would be lengthy and held no guarantee of justice.

The families acted on the recommendation, and the family accused of the abuse paid 4 million kyats to San Kay Khaing (US$3,235) and 1 million ($809) to Tha Zin. The amount included three years' worth of salaries that had not been paid.

Swe Win was not happy with the compromise which was made, and said that the abusers were only convinced that they needed to pay the compensation after being threatened with legal action.

"I even told them to apologize to the two victims' families. But they refused to do it. They said nothing to the families of the victims, and they just gave money," Swe Win said.

He added there should be a punishment for the long-term abuse.

"The parents of the victims had no idea what to do. I was only there as an observer and I could not say anything," he said. "It is very important to have justice based on the rule of law in a case like this. For me, I found it unfair to make a compromise like this."

The three family representatives who attended the meeting did not admit to violating San Kay Khaing's or Tha Zin's rights. They did, however, say that they beat the two girls for "disrespect" and offered to provide evidence for how they violated house rules.

"They were just children," Swe Win said. "If the family disliked the two children, they could have just sent them back."

He added that he will not drop charges at the police station regarding the case against the family, and hopes to pursue further legal action.

"We need to fight for justice based on the laws of our country," Swe Win said. "This is the only way to stop this."

The post Rangoon Family Who 'Enslaved' Girls for Years Settle Case for $4,000 appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

UMFCCI Elects New President, Executive Committee

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 07:45 AM PDT

U Zaw Min Win— a former UMFCCI vice-president, chairman of Myanmar Food Processors Exporters Association, and President of Myanmar Industries Association— is elected president of the UMFCCI. (Photo: UMFCCI)

U Zaw Min Win— a former UMFCCI vice-president, chairman of Myanmar Food Processors Exporters Association, and President of Myanmar Industries Association— is elected president of the UMFCCI. (Photo: UMFCCI)

RANGOON — Burma's biggest independent economic body, the Union of Myanmar Federation of Chambers of Commerce and Industry (UMFCCI), elected its new president and committee members, amid high expectations of change from industry observers.

In Saturday night's election, U Zaw Min Win—a former UMFCCI vice-president, chairman of Myanmar Food Processors Exporters Association, and President of Myanmar Industries Association—was elected president over recent chair U Win Aung of Dagon International Co. Ltd and chairman of Thilawa Special Economic Zone (SEZ) holdings.

The UMFCCI's members voted in its new executive body including the President, seven vice-presidents and other office bearers.

The newly-elected vice-presidents, leaders in different sectors of the business community in Burma, are: U Thein Han (Fortune International), Dr. Maung Maung Lay (Ni Lay Naing Co. Ltd), U Thaung Tin (KMD Group of Companies), U Hla Maung Shwe (Shwe Family), Dr Myo Thet, U Wai Phyo (Yatha Cho Co Ltd) and U Ye Min Aung (Ayeyar Hinthar Holdings Co. Ltd).

The Secretary-General is U Aung Kyi Soe, managing director of the Myanmar Liquefied Petroleum Gas Group Company, while joint secretaries-general are: U Aye Win, U Aung Khin Myint, Dr. Aung Thein, U Tha Doe Hein, U Kyaw Dewa, U Myo Thant and Daw Khine Khine Nwe, according to the announcement of the UMFCCI.

In the UMFCCI announcement, U Zaw Min Win said that the UMFCCI needed to amend the Chamber's constitution to make it less ambiguous and to strengthen its affiliated associations. He highlighted the need for "good governance" and stated that he would not be striving for personal profit in his role as President.

"The UMFCCI needs to work closely with the new government to restore its reputation with politicians, the media, the general public and our affiliated associations," he said in the statement.

There were some complaints that female members and young members of the wider business community were not represented in the new CEC.

"New members should not be the same as the recent committee; there should be more young business men. They should do more work after changing the members," one businessperson, who wanted to remain anonymous, said.

"Current president U Win Aung is running Thilawa SEZ projects, so he and his group have been accused of making opportunities for themselves. This time, it should different from them," the source said.

U Hla Maung Shwe, recently elected as vice-president among six others, told The Irrawaddy that the new committee may not include young people or well-known business people, as Chamber members had to register to vote in order to participate in the selection, which some may not have done in time.

"There are 195 candidates competing in the election this year. There may be some complaints as some candidates […]  were not voted for by [all] members of the Chamber," he said.

"But there are some new young business people who have now been made vice-president, like U Ye Min Aun and U Wai Phyo," he said.

He added that the new committee will be criticized if its new members fail to reform the Chamber and provide new opportunities for the business community in Burma.

"New members are responsible for walking the government through their policies. We will need to work as negotiators between the business community and the government," he said.

"U Zaw Min Win has no big businesses like U Win Aung, so the situation will change," he added.

There is no information on when CEC members will hand the work over to the newly-elected committee.

The UMFCCI is a national, non-governmental organization representing and safeguarding the interests of Burma's private business sector. It was founded in 1991 (as the Burmese Chamber of Commerce) and has about 30,000 members.

The post UMFCCI Elects New President, Executive Committee appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Interfaith Leaders Call on Individuals to Build Peace

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 07:38 AM PDT

Religious leaders, peace activists and parliamentary members at the pre-celebration of International Day of Peace on Saturday in Rangoon. (Photo: Ar Yone Oo)

Religious leaders, peace activists and parliamentary members at the pre-celebration of International Day of Peace on Saturday in Rangoon. (Photo: Ar Yone Oo)

RANGOON — Burma's religious leaders have joined together in urging people to continue building peace on an individual level throughout the country.

Following the new government's Union Peace Conference—the initial national level peace negotiations that will continue in the coming months at the state and divisional levels—Buddhist, Christian, Muslim and Hindu religious leaders called on people to cease the misunderstanding and hatred between different ethnic and religious communities, at the pre-celebration of the International Day of Peace in Rangoon on Saturday.

The International Day of Peace falls on September 21, and this year's theme is: "Sustainable Development Goals: Building Blocks for Peace." The event was organized by local NGO, Ar Yone Oo, in collaboration with the Swedish embassy and the Swedish Peace and Arbitration Society. Religious leaders, local civil society members and peace activists attended.

Ashin Issariya, a Buddhist monk and writer, told participants that previously there had been misunderstandings and hate speech spread among different communities because there had not been open discussions held in the country.

The monk said that he does not accept hate speech, which some other nationalist Buddhist monks have participated in.

"We all need to cooperate in building peace. We all have a duty to stop hate speech, which can cause unrest," Issariya said.

"If we want to achieve peace, all individuals first need to try to bring peace to our hearts. That individual peace will transmit from one to another."

Burma's first Catholic cardinal Charles Bo agreed.

"If there is no peace in your heart; if there is no peace in your family, if there is no peace in your place of work; there will not be peace in the world or in Myanmar," he said.

Cardinal Bo said last month's Union Peace Conference was a door that could open a "long myth of hope," adding that ethnic and religious hatred is the enemy of peace and that all must work in tandem with the new government.

The leaders cited recent clashes between the Burma Army and ethnic armed groups throughout the country as the impetus for the peace conference.

"What's the mindset of military personnel regarding peace? What's the mindset of the different armed groups?" Bo asked the group.

Al Haj U Aye Lwin, founder of the interfaith group Religions for Peace, said there was no peace inside the country as long as there is injustice and discrimination, along with an armed conflict lasting more than 50 years and millions of people internally displaced throughout that time.

"I think we have suffered enough. We deserve peace. If we want to achieve peace, we need to clear all the doubts in all the communities and build mutual understanding and trust," U Aye Lwin said.

He added a belief in Islam that says: If the heart is at peace, it will bring peace to one's neighbor.

The Hindu leader U San Min Naing also urged collaboration with the country's first democratically elected government led by Nobel laureate Daw Aung San Suu Kyi.

"We now have good leaders. We, as citizens, need to try to help," he said.

The post Interfaith Leaders Call on Individuals to Build Peace appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Lifting Burma’s Sanctions: Who is the Real Winner?

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 07:28 AM PDT

Myawaddy Bank Ltd on Rangoon's Strand Road. (Photo: Myo Min Soe / The Irrawaddy)

Myawaddy Bank Ltd on Rangoon's Strand Road. (Photo: Myo Min Soe / The Irrawaddy)

Burma's long oppressed ethnic groups and critics of the country's military generals are beginning to understand that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's US visit will bring business opportunities, wealth and blanket amnesty to many rich and powerful people who remain out of favor.

Growing criticism went as far as to suggest that the decision to lift all sanctions meant that the United States and the White House do not really care about the civil war, ongoing human rights abuses in ethnic regions, a patchy transition, students, activists, or crimes committed by greedy cronies and their dodgy associates.

The question now is: Who is to blame?

During the visit, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi acknowledged that US assistance and moral support aided Burma's transformation. But before thanking the US and the Obama administration, it is noteworthy to remember that cronies, criminals and some mass murderers feel that they have gotten what they wanted, thanks to President Obama's lifting of sanctions on the country.

In this economic landscape, who will hold the moral high ground in Burma? Surely not neighboring China.

Some fear that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi will have less and less leverage to negotiate with the military—which controls 25 percent of the seats in Parliament, can declare a nationwide state of emergency, refuses to amend the 2008 military-drafted constitution and continues its ground offensive and air strikes in ethnic areas. Some wait and hope that military leaders will reward Daw Aung San Suu Kyi with constitutional changes. We will see what happens, but we won't hold our breath.

Aung Zaw is the founding editor-in-chief of The Irrawaddy.

Aung Zaw is the founding editor-in-chief of The Irrawaddy.

Back home, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi faces questions from ethnic and community leaders on her position on sanctions, which may serve as a hurdle to achieving nationwide peace. Some ethnic leaders say it was too early to lift sanctions, as an ongoing war continues in the north and negotiations are only at at early stage.

Her supporters posit that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi wanted to maintain some measure of sanctions until the political transition was irreversible but that she was not well informed regarding the termination of the US National Emergency Act and that its removal would jointly remove all remaining sanctions.

Last week, the London-based BBC quoted a source who hinted that Daw Aung San Suu Kyi was not in full agreement with the decision to lift all sanctions but was left with little choice. "US officials told her it was all or nothing, and the historic decision was made to lift all sanctions," wrote the BBC.

Some think that pro-business groups and lobbyists for military enterprises in Burma—including the Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd (UMEHL) and the Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC)—along with some US and White House officials, were largely responsible for the removal of all sanctions.

The UMEHL and the MEC are the two biggest industrial conglomerates controlled by the military, and they have managed to dominate many of the country's key economic sectors.

Under the previous regime, the two were under the direct management of the old War Office or, as it is now officially called, the Ministry of Defense.

The UMEHL was formed in 1990 as "a special public company, with shareholders limited to the Directorate of Defense Procurement, Ministry of Defense, Defense Regimental Institutes, and other bodies of the Defense Services and War Veterans." Senior figures in the armed forces manage the enterprise.

The corporation is involved in jade mining, gems, tourism, imports, real estate, exportation of foodstuffs, automobiles, banking, the Myanmar Brewery, transportation, large-scale construction and Myawaddy Bank—which is listed as a private bank.

The MEC is also involved in the harvest of teak and the extraction of natural gas and oil, as well as in communications. The list is endless and the corruption no doubt is deep.

But the military and its enterprises are moving fast – faster than the elected government could have fathomed.

In February, the Burma Army's Commander-in-Chief Snr-Gen Min Aung Hlaing said he intends to privatize all military-owned companies at an appropriate time.

On March 31, the UMEHL applied to the Ministry of Planning and Finance to become a "public company”—to register according to country's Companies Act and as a show of offering greater transparency and accountability.

However, the military is thriving and remains a key player in Burma's military enterprise. It will continue to do so as they are, in fact, a government within the government.

The country has seen a long history of military business interests and activities in Burma. To ensure greater accountability and transparency regarding these enterprises will be challenging. In Burma, no one is well equipped to hold them responsible.

The fact is, the military enterprise is bigger than the government's. With the latest rewards from the US and the White House, they will feel like they are the real winners, as opposed to the ordinary Burmese citizens who sanctions were purportedly intended to support.

The post Lifting Burma's Sanctions: Who is the Real Winner? appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Former Information Minister Surprised by USDP Membership Appointment

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 05:08 AM PDT

Former Minister of Information U Ye Htut speaks to reporters in 2014.

Former Minister of Information U Ye Htut speaks to reporters in 2014.

RANGOON — Former Minister of Information U Ye Htut has been appointed as an auxiliary member of the once-ruling Union Solidarity and Development Party (USDP) without his prior knowledge.

For the five months since the transfer of power from a USDP administration to a civilian-led government, Ye Htut has been in Singapore, where he is a senior visiting fellow at the Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS).

"I didn't know that I became an auxiliary member of the USDP, because I was in Singapore when the party held its annual meeting. I was informed of this when I visited for a while earlier this month," Ye Htut told The Irrawaddy, referring to a research trip back to Burma.

In the party's general meeting in August, ex-general U Than Htay, former Minister of Energy, became the party chairman, replacing former chairman and ex-President U Thein Sein.

Local daily newspaper The Voice reported on the formation of a USDP veterans group including U Thein Sein, U Htay Oo, U Aye Myint, U Thaung, U Soe Tha, U Loon Thi, U Tin Htut, U Myint Maung and U Khin Aung Myint. It was the veterans group that appointed U Ye Htut as an auxiliary party member.

"I informed the party that I was not able to be involved in the party's activities while I am a visiting fellow. After finishing my tenure at ISEAS, I will decide on my future," Ye Htut said.

Ye Htut's affiliation with the party—formed in 2010—dates back to his membership in the organization's predecessor, the Union Solidarity and Development Association.

"I am not a member of the party anymore," he said.

The post Former Information Minister Surprised by USDP Membership Appointment appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Suu Kyi Blames Politics for Opposition to Arakan Commission

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 03:02 AM PDT

 Sittwe residents staged a protest upon the arrival of Kofi Annan in the Arakan State capital in September 2016. (Photo: Maung Kyaw Hein MPA / The Irrawaddy)

Sittwe residents staged a protest upon the arrival of Kofi Annan in the Arakan State capital in September 2016. (Photo: Maung Kyaw Hein MPA / The Irrawaddy)

RANGOON — State Counselor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi said politics was behind a joint statement from 11 political parties opposing the Kofi Annan-led Arakan State Advisory Commission.

"Denouncing the Kofi Annan Commission is not only based on race and religion but also, I think, political motivation," she said during a meeting with members of the Burmese community in New York on Saturday.

"It makes me really sad. It should not be that people denounce the commission for political party interests when we are working for the whole country."

Her comments came after a joint statement made by former ruling party the Union Solidarity and Development party and 10 other parties—all of which were heavily defeated by the National League for Democracy in last year's general election.

The statement released last Friday said they were concerned about the commission's activities, and said that the "formation of the commission is not in line with the State Counselor's authority."

Daw Aung San Suu Kyi formed the commission led by the former UN Secretary-General in August.

The commission has attracted criticism, especially from the local Arakanese party, for the inclusion of foreigners in the panel.

During the meeting with the Burmese community, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi said "there is nothing to lose from the commission."

"Thanks to the formation [of the commission], the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has decided to drop the resolution on the human rights issue," she said in reference to a proposed resolution on the marginalized Rohingya at the UN assembly.

Kofi Annan visited Arakan State, also known as Rakhine State, in early September. After his trip, the former UN Secretary General told the media that the commission's purpose was not to investigate rights abuses but to write an "impartial report."

"I hope our recommendations will be helpful as we intend to reduce tension and support development," said Mr. Annan.

The post Suu Kyi Blames Politics for Opposition to Arakan Commission appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

From the Archive: The Heroic Medics of the 8888 Uprising

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 02:38 AM PDT

 The iconic photo in which medical student Win Zaw (L) and house surgeon Dr. Saw Lwin carry 16-year-old pro-democracy protestor Win Maw Oo to an ambulance after she was fatally shot on September 18, 1988. (Photo: S Lehman / Visions)

The iconic photo in which medical student Win Zaw (L) and house surgeon Dr. Saw Lwin carry 16-year-old pro-democracy protestor Win Maw Oo to an ambulance after she was fatally shot on September 18, 1988. (Photo: S Lehman / Visions)

Twenty-eight years ago, demonstrations across Burma demanded an end to Gen Ne Win's military dictatorship. After government troops opened fire on the 8888 Uprising in Rangoon, hundreds were seriously injured. Many doctors and nurses worked around the clock to save the injured.

Win Maw Oo is remembered from the iconic picture of a blood-soaked young woman being carried away by two medics during the 1988 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Rangoon. She begged her father not to perform the Buddhist last rites until "Burma enjoys democracy." In May those funerary rites were performed, after nobel laureate Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party assumed power.

Sixteen-year-old pro-democracy activist Win Maw Oo was carried to an ambulance by house surgeon Dr. Saw Lwin and medical student Win Zaw after being fatally shot on September 18, 1988. Today, The Irrawaddy looks back at this article about the 8888 Uprising and the brave doctors and nurses who worked tirelessly during that time.

RANGOON — Twenty five years ago, the streets of Rangoon swelled with hundreds of thousands of protestors demanding an end to Burma's military dictatorship. After government troops opened fire on them, hundreds were seriously injured. Many would have died if it had not been for Dr Myat Htoo Razak and Dr Win Zaw.

Like many doctors and nurses, the young house surgeon and medical student worked around the clock to save the lives of injured protestors during the hectic days of the 8888 Uprising.

Myat Htoo Razak recalled the unforgettable scenes that he witnessed on August 9, 1988, one day after popular, nationwide pro-democracy demonstrations started in Rangoon and other cities across Burma.

"Some of them were shot in their chests, arms and legs," he said in a recent interview with The Irrawaddy. "Two of them were seriously injured; one was shot in his head and another one shot in his eye."

The then 24-year-old house surgeon and his team had arrived at the Maternal and Child Welfare Association in Rangoon's North Okkalapa Township shortly before troops began to fire on crowds of peaceful demonstrators, who had gathered nearby.

One monk who made a speech urging protestors to keep marching was fatally shot. Many protestors ran into the building to flee the gunfire, some were bleeding from bullet wounds in their torsos, arms and legs.

The medical team, which came from North Okkalapa Hospital, had already prepared emergency treatment facilities as they feared that authorities might launch a violent crackdown on the demonstrations. Myat Htoo Razak and three other house surgeons (young doctors who are still undergoing practical training) and nurses started treating the many wounded.

But soon, soldiers surrounded the Maternal and Child Welfare Association and two captains entered building to intimidate the demonstrators. "We just used rubber bullets. Or else, you would have all been dead," one of them said looking at injured protestors.

The captain's heartless words infuriated Myat Htoo Razak but he tried to cope with his anger for the sake of his patients. The would-be doctor then asked the officers to transport two seriously wounded patients to North Okkalapa Hospital.

In the meantime, more injured people were coming into the building. Myat Htoo Razak and his small team kept treating the injured until late afternoon. When he got back to North Okkalapa Hospital, the troops were shooting right in front of the building.

"We didn't even need to go too far to carry patients as they were shooting in front of the hospital. The injured people were just carried into the hospital. Inside, we treated many of the injured people," he said.

While the doctors like Myat Htoo Razak worked ceaselessly to operate on the many wounded, pools of blood covered the hospital floors and numerous bodies arrived at the mortuary. "It was a tragic scene to see the dead bodies of our brothers and sisters," he said.

For 10 days, government violence continued and wounded pro-democracy demonstrators filled the wards of hospitals and clinics in Rangoon and across Burma.

When Dr Maung Maung, a civilian, became interim president on August 19 the shootings ended and people from all walks of life joined the demonstrations, which had now spread nationwide, from Burma's big cities to tiny villages throughout the country.

On September 18, the military staged a coup d'état and the crackdown worsened. Troops shot down many more demonstrators, including schoolchildren, students, civil servants and housewives. An estimated total of 3,000 people were killed and many more protestors were injured in August and September of 1988.

For the injured, doctors, nurses and house surgeons like Myat Htoo Razak, provided life-saving care at a critical moment in the country's history.

The 88' pro-democracy movement was the biggest people power uprising that Burma had seen since gaining independence from Britain in 1948. It toppled the country's oppressive authoritarian regime of military strongman Ne Win and his Burma Socialist Programme Party, which had ruled the country for 26 years.

The military coup and subsequent crackdown on the 8888 Uprising, however, would leave the army in charge for two more decades.

Another medical student who helped treat Burma's brave protestors at the time was Win Zaw.

Doctors, nurses and medical staffs not only treated the injured, but also took part in the demonstrations, and 23-year-old Win Zaw joined a group of medical students who staged a hunger strike on September 18 at Rangoon's University of Medicine.

After the army staged a coup at 4 pm that day, it announced that all demonstrators should disperse and leave their camps and the streets.

Win Zaw and his fellow students went to Rangoon General Hospital and spent the night helping doctors in treating hundreds of demonstrators who had been shot by troops as they tried to clear the streets of Rangoon.

The next morning, at about 10:30 am, Win Zaw and doctors got news that the troops had again opened fire on protestors. Win Zaw quickly joined a small team that included a surgeon named Win Ko, two doctors and another house surgeon by the name of Dr Saw Lwin.

They drove through the streets collecting the wounded, putting as many as 15 patients into their small ambulance. After two runs to pick up the victims, they heard that shots had been fired at a demonstration near Sule Pagoda in central Rangoon

As they reached the pagoda, it became clear that the troops had committed a massacre.

"It is a scene that I can never forget for the rest of life. There were a lot of bodies and injured people on street," Win Zaw recalled in an interview. "A photo of our Bogyoke [Aung San] was on the street, our fighting peacock flag [the symbol of students' movement] was also down, sandals were scattered and pools of blood were everywhere."

As they looked among the numerous bodies for protestors who were still alive, Win Zaw noticed one young girl who was breathing faintly. He approached and heard her murmur, "Brother, help me."

Win Zaw lifted the girl by her arms while house surgeon Saw Lwin held her legs. Wearing white physician duty coats, they carried her to the nearby ambulance. At that time, he noticed a flash of a camera and heard one of the soldiers bellowing: "Don't take pictures! Or else, we'll shoot!"

At that time, Win Zaw had no idea the picture would become an internationally well-known, historic picture that symbolized just how brutal the army's crackdown on innocent protestors had been. Later, he found out that the young girl's name was Win Maw Oo, a 16-year-old high school student.

On that dark day, September 19, 1988, Win Zaw's team made seven runs to collect the wounded from Rangoon's blood-covered streets. Another ambulance team of Rangoon General Hospital conducted a similar number of emergency rescues.

By the evening, he learned Win Maw Oo was being treated at the intensive care unit and that she was still alive after having suffered gunshot wounds in one arm, one leg and a lung. At 5:35 pm, however, she died.

The medical staff also risked their lives by going out and collecting wounded protestors from Rangoon's streets. Myat Htoo Razak remembers that at least one medical student was shot and killed, while another required a life-saving operation.

Myat Htoo Razak and a senior surgeon, Dr Kyaw Myint Naing, operated on final-year medical student Moe Thu Win for six and a half hours after a bullet had shredded the main artery in his arm. The doctors thought they might have to amputate the limb, but eventually the operation was successful.

During 10 days of bloody repression in 1988, the doctors continuously treated injured protestors, although some of the wounded didn't dare to come to hospitals out of fear that the military would arrest them there.

For some medical staff, their work would have repercussions later. The military had taken note of Win Zaw and Saw Lwin after the photo of their rescue of the young girl Win Maw Oo became famous the world over.

Four years later, the notorious Military Intelligence's unit-6, better known as MI-6, detained Dr Win Zaw for five days and asked him about the details of the events of that day.

For his colleague Dr Saw Lwin the consequences would be far greater, however. The military authorities forced Saw Lwin's father to retire from his position as the director of a government department. This pressure on his family caused Saw Lwin to sink into a deep depression. Years later, he committed suicide.

Until this day, Win Zaw said, Saw Lwin's family cannot bear to watch the tragic picture of their rescue attempt.

For both Dr Win Zaw and Dr Myat Htoo Razak the events of 1988 were life defining moments, and all these years later both say they are still dedicated to establishing genuine democracy in Burma.

"The 88 uprising shaped our lives," said Myat Htoo Razak, who now lives in the United States and has worked on HIV/Aids research and strengthening health care systems in Asia and Africa.

Win Zaw, who is now secretary of the Myanmar Medical Association's General Practitioners Society, said, "In fact, we are still waiting to get what we demanded 25 years ago."

The post From the Archive: The Heroic Medics of the 8888 Uprising appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

China Media: Opposition to Hydropower Dams in Burma is “Extreme”

Posted: 18 Sep 2016 11:07 PM PDT

Demonstrators walk to Myitsone, Kachin State in March 2014 to protest the Myitsone hydroelectric power development project on the Irrawaddy River.  (Photo: Soe Zeya Tun / Reuters)

Demonstrators walk to Myitsone, Kachin State in March 2014 to protest the Myitsone hydroelectric power development project on the Irrawaddy River.  (Photo: Soe Zeya Tun / Reuters)

BEIJING, China — Opposition to Chinese-invested hydropower schemes in Burma is being orchestrated by "extreme" groups in the country and has been extremely damaging to joint investment projects, an influential Chinese newspaper wrote on Monday.

The suspension in 2011 of the US$3.6 billion Myitsone mega dam project by former president Thein Sein remains a sore point between the two countries.

Burma suspended the project citing environmental worries, but the decision was also seen as an attempt to distance itself from Beijing. Uncertainties arising from that controversy have held back other Chinese investment plans.

Burma leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, whose party swept to power in the country's first free national vote in 25 years last November, said on a visit to China last month that her new government was willing to look for a resolution that suits both countries.

A Burma commission is reviewing the project, and other proposed hydro-power dams.

But Suu Kyi is under pressure at home from civil society groups not to simply give in to Beijing.

The Study Times, published twice a week by the Central Party School, which trains rising Chinese officials, said in a commentary that the dam projects were being unreasonably attacked.

"Before and after Suu Kyi’s China trip, some extreme Burma media, non-government organizations and people heatedly opposed the Myitsone Dam and other large-scale projects on the Salween River" and demanded the projects be stopped, the newspaper said.

"Certain Burmese media even said that stopping these dams was an important step to show that Burma is throwing off its over-reliance economically on China," the paper said.

While it's hard to know how representative these voices are, their "extreme comments" have dominated privately-run media in Burma, the paper added.

"This has had a hugely negative effect on public opinion and has been hugely damaging for joint cooperation projects," it said.

Finding a solution to the Myitsone project is important for Daw Aung San Suu Kyi who needs China's cooperation in talks with ethnic minority armed groups operating along the border with China.

The Study Times praised the State Counselor for making China her first port of call apart from countries in the Association of Southeast Asia Nations (Asean) since her government took power, saying it was recognition of how important ties are.

China is no fairweather friend, it added.

''China is willing to invest in basic infrastructure projects in Burma that the West is not willing to invest in,'' the paper said.

The post China Media: Opposition to Hydropower Dams in Burma is "Extreme" appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

National News

National News


After guilty verdict, families of killed Mong Yaw villagers await compensation

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:24 AM PDT

In a rare admission of military misconduct, a Tatmadaw court martial has found seven soldiers guilty of murdering Shan villagers during a botched interrogation. But family members of the deceased victims told The Myanmar Times that the verdict, with its minimal prison terms, fell far short of delivering justice for their loved ones.

Saffron monk calls for poverty ‘master plan’ at revolution’s anniversary

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:17 AM PDT

A leader of the Saffron Revolution yesterday called for a "master plan" to eradicate poverty in Myanmar, at an event marking the ninth anniversary of the popular uprising, which was sparked by deteriorating economic conditions in the country.

Political parties rail against Rakhine State commission

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:08 AM PDT

Further buttressing complaints about the Rakhine State Advisory Commission, 11 political parties put out a joint statement calling for the disbanding of the "illegitimate" new body.

Restoration prioritised at quake-affected Thatbyinnyu Pagoda

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:06 AM PDT

The famous Thatbyinnyu Pagoda in Bagan will be repaired as a priority following damage incurred in the 6.8-magnitude earthquake last month, according to government officials.

Union legislature to tackle protest law differences

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:05 AM PDT

With the upper and lower houses unable to reconcile differences over draft amendments to the Peaceful Assembly and Procession Law, the Amyotha Hluttaw Speaker announced last week that lawmakers would hash out their disagreements in the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw.

Workers in Mandalay protest Arbitration Council reps

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:04 AM PDT

Members of labour organisations in Mandalay Region yesterday brought more pressure on the Arbitration Council's labour delegates, demonstrating in favour of re-selecting those seats on the dispute settlement body.

No end in sight to deadly Kayin State clashes

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:03 AM PDT

Deadly clashes are continuing to flare in Hpapun township, Kayin State, three weeks after fighting first broke out. Negotiations between armed factions last week appear to have failed to staunch the fighting.

State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi receives humanitarian award from Harvard

Posted: 18 Sep 2016 11:50 PM PDT

State Counsellor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi was honoured at a ceremony at Harvard University this weekend, where she received the presitigious school's 2016 Humanitarian Award.

Myanmar to fight ozone harm

Posted: 18 Sep 2016 11:45 PM PDT

Myanmar will work with other countries to reduce usage of ozone-depleting substances, U Khin Maung Yi, permanent secretary of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Conservation, announced at a ceremony in Nay Pyi Taw marking International Ozone Preservation Day.

Prayers of peace offered for war-weary Myanmar

Posted: 18 Sep 2016 11:42 PM PDT

Amid ongoing conflict and in the wake of the 21st-century Panglong Conference earlier this month, religious leaders joined members of civil society yesterday at a Yangon gathering to offer their prayers for peace.

Shan Herald Agency for News

Shan Herald Agency for News


BURMA ARMY'S WAR PATH: Flared up conflict in Karen State endangers nascent refugee repatriation program

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 06:00 AM PDT

The Democratic Karen Benevolent Army (DKBA) splinter group armed engagement which has been brewing even before the start of the Union Peace Conference (UPC) or 21st Century Panglong Conference (21CPC) escalated into a full-blown conflict, resulting in hundreds of internally displaced persons (IDPs) and refugees fleeing to the inner side of the country and also to the Thai side of the border. Accordingly, more than 4,000 people have fled the violence so far.

Adding to this is the military, also known as Tatmadaw, offensives on Kachin Independence Organization/Army (KIO/KIA), Shan State Progress Party/Shan State Army (SSPP/SSA) and Palaung State Liberation Army/Ta'ang National Liberation Army (PSLF/TNLA), which are in no way helpful or compatible to end the armed ethnic conflict, raging for some seven decades since the beginning of independence from the British in 1948.

The much touted 21CPC held from 31 August to 3 September in Naypyitaw, which the State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi vowed to be as all-inclusive as possible, so that it could pave way to end the ethnic armed conflict and eventually create an environment conducive for appropriate peace talks, has not materialized, to the chagrin of Suu Kyi and many concerned stakeholders, except for the military faction that has sidelined the 3 Ethnic Armed Organizations (EAOs) that it dislike.

But the Commander-in-Chief Min Aung Hlaing said in his opening speech of the 21CPC said that the Tatmadaw has all through out the different eras actively participated in the peace-building and unity of the country. Furthermore, he said that even though there might be difference of opinion, the Tatmadaw is determined to achieve peace, as the negative side of the war directly affected both parties, the EAOs and as well the Tatmadaw troops.

Additionally, he stressed: "I believe we could overcome this task (of achieving peace) through the strength of unity. For this I want to again confirmed that the Tatmadaw is steadfastly performing the task to its commitment of achieving peace at all cost".

Despite all these good will gesture and colourful speech, the war escalated immediately after the 21CPC, dashing all the hope of peaceful atmosphere on the ground and adding thousands of refugees and IDPs to the already appalling figures.

But before turning to the said forced migration, let us first look at the latest escalation of ethnic armed engagement that has poisoned the situation, which could push back the peace process,   due to the failed decision-making of the powers that be.

War in Kachin, Shan and Karen States

To understand the recent armed conflict escalation, it is necessary to go a bit back into the backdrop of ethnic conflict situation.

The ethnic resistance to Bamar domination has started almost immediately after the achievement of independence from the British in 1948. The Karen revolted, due to the racial conflict between the Bamar and Karen sometimes earlier, coupled with the then Prime Minister U Nu's removing of all Karen officers including General Smith Dun and replacing it with General Ne Win, a Bamar or Burmese. The Karen National Union (KNU) declared war to the Burmese government on 31 January 1949 and captured towns, including Insein close to Rangoon. It took several months before the government troops could recapture the lost towns and was, for a time, even mocked as "Yangon (Rangoon) government" for the rest of the territories were either under insurgents control or could not be ruled.

On 14 June 1949 the KNU proclaimed the Karen Free State or Kawthoolei together with the Four Principles. The then KNU President Saw Ba U Gyi created the said Four Principles, which said: 1. Surrender is out of the question. 2. Recognition of the Karen State must be completed. 3. We shall retain our arms. 4. We shall determine our destiny. These principles have formed the heart of the KNU insurgency ever since.

Due to the political grievances of the non-Bamar ethnic groups over equal representation, power and resources sharing, coupled with the then Prime Minister U Nu's declaration of Buddhism as a state religion, all assorted ethnic groups rose up in arms. By the end of 50s and early 60s Burma was to experience the full blown civil war that encompassed almost the whole country.

To make the long story short, the insurgency was at its height, when the Communist Party of Burma (CPB) was backed by China until it changed the stance of exporting its brand of communism in late 80s, eventually withdrawing material support to the CPB.

In 1989, the ethnic troops within the CPB mutinied and struck deals with the then military's Burma Socialist Programme Party (BSPP) government. Out of the chaos the United Wa State Army (UWSA), Mongla or National Democratic Alliance Army (NDAA)  and Kokang or Myanmar  National Democratic Alliance Army (MNDAA) came into existence, made up from the former CPB units. The former two have ceasefire agreement with the Tatmadaw for more than twenty years, while the latter is rejected and hated by the military for trying to stage a comeback to reassert its authority by attacking government positions in February last year, which the Tatmadaw has helped installed with its proxy.

After the relative calm, intermittently punctuated with on and off military clashes between the EAOs and the Tatmadaw in southern Shan State and Karen State, the military regime confident with its new strategy pressed the EAOs to come under its wing through its Border Guard Force (BGF) scheme starting from 2009, coupled with the government announcement that all ceasefires signed as "null and void". The main reason being that the military-drawn 2008 constitution promulgation expressed "only one army" regulation and thus all other military organizations must either be absorbed or demobilised.

With this pressure, the  regime's economic, political and military pressures followed, like blocking Chinese border trade through the KIO's Laiza headquarters, ordering the closure of all but two of the KIO liaison offices in government- controlled areas, barred a Kachin Political Party, Kachin State Progressive Party (KSPP), from registering and contesting in the 2010 elections, and referred to ceasefire groups as "insurgents" in the media; and attacking the MNDAA (Kokang) and captured their headquarters (August 2009), many militia groups reported military build-up near their outposts and some have even been attacked - the worse  being in Kachin state and Northern Shan State. (Source: Border Guard Force Scheme - Myanmar Peace Monitor)

But despite such pressures, the ethnic resistance continued, which prompted the government to change its aggressive stance on August 18, 2011 when President Thein Sein pledged to make the ethnic issue a national priority, offering dialogue with all armed groups and dropping key preconditions for talks, namely the BGF requirement. Nevertheless the BGF scheme remains a part of the government's peace plan and is listed as point 8 in the Union level peace negotiations' 8-points: "To coordinate existence of only a single armed force in accord with the Constitution", according to Myanmar Peace Monitor.

Following Thein Sein's peace initiative, after four years of Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) documentation was worked out and 8 EAOs out of 21 signed the document on 15 October 2015. Thus the splitting of the EAOs into two camps of signatory and non-signatory, with the military going down hard on the non-signatory, particularly the KIO/KIA, SSPP/SSA, MNDAA, TNLA and Arakan Army (AA), reportedly to pressure them to sign the NCA.

In the course of NCA document formulation, all EAOs have signed either state or union level ceasefire agreements, with the exception of KIO/KIA. But in the aftermath of NCA signing on 15 October 2015, the regime seems to be also nullifying the state and union level ceasefire agreements and conducting offensives on those non-signatory EAOs to push them to sign the NCA.

For the moment, the non-signatory EAOs are pushing for all-inclusiveness participation, tripartite dialogue composition, reformation of the Burma Army and genuine federal union formation as their key demand and is in the process of negotiation. Parallel to this, the military has increased its offensives in Kachin, Shan and Karen States, doing disservice to the peace process, while creating hardship for the ethnic population.

Recent conflict escalation

On the eve and aftermath of the UPC or 21CPC, escalation of armed engagement between the Tatmadaw and the non-signatory EAOs were registered and becoming more visible.

While the ongoing on and off military offensives in Kachin and Shan States are not new and have been ongoing for the last four years or so, the large scale conflict close to the Thai border, in Karen State is a new development since the peace process started, which also seems to signify that the Tatmadaw is more on its war path and less on peaceful negotiations.

DKBA

Clashes reportedly first broke out on June 29, when government troops tried to secure the area ahead of Burma Army South-eastern Division Commander Gen. Tin Maung Win's visit to Myawaddy.

On 12 September, nearly 40 armed clashes occurred between the Tatmadaw, supported by the BGF and the Democratic Karen Benevolence Army (DKBA) splinter group, also known by its political setup name Klohtoobaw Karen Organization (KKO), over a dispute over illegal taxation along the Asia Highway in Karen State, which remains unresolved. The splinter group is said to be led by Saw San Aung and Saw Kyaw Thet, two DKBA colonels that has been leading the ethnic armed group's recent operations.

State media reported on 12 September that four soldiers from the DKBA were killed and three others detained, and that "some army officers from the Tatmadaw sacrificed their lives for the country" in the course of nearly 40 clashes between the two sides.

Another media source however reported quite differently when a soldier fighting with the DKBA said: "I witnessed a pile of BGF soldier corpses. I guess there might have been around 100 of them."

The KNU has protested to the Chairman of National Reconciliation and Peace Committee on September 10 and sent copies to the departments concerned asking for the de-escalation of ongoing conflict arising from military operations launched by government troops and BGF in Mae Tha Waw area.

However, the Tatmadaw on 16 September replied that the operation is a limited one and would not effect other areas, which it was bound to undertake as the DKBA is harassing its troops and issued statement tantamount to declaration of war on the government. But the DKBA countered that it was pushed to defend itself, due to the Tatmadaw's reinforcements and expansion into its controlled areas.

Most fighting has taken place on the recently opened Asia Highway and an older road that also links Myawaddy and Kawkareik in Karen State and at this writing the fighting is still ongoing.

KIO/KIA

Coinciding with State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi's  visit to Europe and the United States, Burmese government forces on 15 September carried  out artillery and ground attacks against outposts  near the Kachin Independence Army (KIA)  headquarters in Laiza.

KIA spokesman Col. Naw Bo said that Burmese troops had launched assaults on two of  its front-line outposts in Waingmaw Township and a security post near Laiza.

"On 15 September, our outposts in an area known as Kinyobum to the west of the Laiza  headquarters were shelled by the Tatmadaw stationed on Khara  Hill," he said. "On the same morning, government forces also launched an attack on our  positions on Ingkhambum Hill near the Myitkyina‐Bhamo Highway in Waingmaw Township."

The KIA spokesman said both sides also exchanged gunfire on 14 September morning between  Waingmaw and Dawhpumyang townships.

Apart from continuous reinforcement of the Tatmadaw, these act of offensives are seen as provocations by the Kachin leadership, in order to derail the peace process.

SSPP/SSA

Less than a week ahead of Burma's historic 21CPC, the Burmese army launched an offensive against the SSPP/SSA in northern Shan State's Lashio District, according to an SSPP/SSA official.

On August 28, 2016, the Burma Army launched an attack on the SSPP/SSA-controlled Loi Je mountain range, one of the highest vantage points in central Shan State, overlooking SSPP/SSA territories west of the Salween, the heartlands of the UWSA to the east, and strategic river crossings in-between. Attacking this hugely important mountain stronghold, which the SSPP/SSA -- and likely the UWSA -- will use every means to defend, is therefore a deliberate provocation to war.

SHAN report of 5 September said that the Burmese military continues to reinforce its troop strength in SSPP/SSA territory, despite calls to seek an end to the conflict by the ethnic armed group at UPC, some three weeks ago, in Naypyitaw.

Refugees and IDPs

The armed conflict escalation have contributed to another influx of refugees and IDP population, particularly in Shan and Karen States.

According to the definition of refugees and displaced persons: Refugees are people who are outside the country of their nationality "owing to a well-founded fear of being persecuted" (1951 Refugee Convention). Internally displaced persons (IDPs) have fled their homes but have not crossed an international frontier.

The UNHCR Factsheet of February 2016 shows 1,53 million IDPs, with a breakdown of Kachin and Northern Shan States 96,000; Rakhine or Arakan State 120,000; Kayah [Karenni], Mon, Karen States and Tanintharyi [Tenasserim] Region 200.000; People without citizenship [IDP returnees but not IDPs in Rakhine State] 940,000; Other peoples of concern [additional IDPs in Bago, Shan (East) and Shan (South) 170,000].

The UNHCR verified refugee population report of 31 August 2016 is 103,823, which are distributed all along the Thai side of the border.

As for the refugee count in China, following the Kokang conflict that drove some70,000 people over to China's Yunan Province, the UN has been unable to verify.

Reportedly, one year after the conflict and 27,000 refugees still remain in China, according to the MNDAA the major donor of a Kokang Refugee Assistance Program. The said number cannot be confirmed by major international humanitarian groups, due to the difficulty accessing the border areas of China.

In April this year Shan Human Rights Foundation released new estimates that over 20,000 Kokang are living in limbo in makeshift camps in neighbouring Yunnan Province in China, a number much  larger than a UNOCHA (United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs) figure from January 2016 stating that about 4,000 Kokang remain displaced, out of the 70,000 who reportedly were uprooted in 2015.

"We don't have any information on Kokang refugees in China, as we don't have access to those areas," said Vivian Tan, a spokeswoman for the UN refugee agency, UNHCR.

Accordingly, the UN has not been able to provide the refugees with any help, she added.

Furthermore, in Thailand there are some 2-3 million migrant workers, many of whom are acutely vulnerable and left their homeland for similar reasons to the refugees.

Perspective

From the outset Burma's refugee and IDPs problems have been mostly man-made disasters, safe for natural disasters like cyclones and earthquakes that occasionally hit the country.

The main man-made disaster is the civil war which has its roots in political grievances, that again is anchored in the need to amendment the constitution. This constitutional crisis, that has plagued the country from the very beginning since the independence in 1948, has created the ethnic resistance and armed struggle and in turn, forced migration.

Thus the armed adversaries first need to end the war so that peace negotiations and political settlement could be worked out. But it gets stuck in the first step as animosity could not be curtailed and more importantly, the inability to build trust earnestly.

Building trust so that animosity could be transformed into giving the benefit of the doubt, if not harmony immediately, practical good-will gesture has first to be shown. And in practical terms it means refraining from launching military offensives and better still, withdrawing to safe distance from all the front-line positions, to show that the Tatmadaw means business. And the best option for the Tatmadaw would be to declare unilateral ceasefire.

But just the contrary is happening and no one should wonder why trust could not be built between the EAOs and the Tatmadaw, much less making progress in the ongoing peace talks.

Seen from the given political position of the Tatmadaw – rejecting meaningful genuine federalism - and its aggressive push to escalate the conflict in Kachin, Shan and Karen States, it is imperative that it is not keen to really achieve ceasefire. If this is the situation, we won't be able to strive for peace, much less political settlement.

In order to meet each other half way, the military would need to do away with its self-employed saviour role of the nation and sole protector of the country's sovereignty. Because with this kind of attitude, it would only see all the EAOs as destructive elements and insurgents, not equal negotiation partners, with real political grievances, that are also striving for a fair share ownership of the sovereignty, equality and rights of self-determination, which they are entitled to; as their forefathers have joined the Union of Burma in 1948, voluntarily as equal rightful partners.

Another factor is the Tatmadaw should not to cling to its exclusion of 3 EAOs, by demanding repentance and surrender in order to be allowed participation in the peace process, and also agree to all-inclusiveness in the peace process.

Further, it should not be entertaining the idea that military pressure could push the non-signatory EAOs to sign the NCA. The military pressure has never worked with the EAOs if lessons could be learned from the past failures. The military coercive pressure, just a few years back, to ram in its BGF scheme so that it could neutralize the EAOs is the glaring example of failed decision-making.

Consequently, it should also be open to the amendment of NCA that all could agree upon, for the non-signatory United Nationalities Federal Council (UNFC), a seven member ethnic armed alliance,  refusal to sign it stems from the dissatisfaction over lack of all-inclusiveness.

As for all the refugees and IDPs to return home durable and sustainable ceasefire atmosphere is a must, which means lasting political settlement has to be in place, for without this nothing would really happen. Besides, even if the said condition is met, there are hosts of conditions that still need to be tackle.

There is no doubt that Suu Kyi has real political will to resolve this forced migration problematic and achieve peace for the whole country. In her 21CPC opening speech part of her speech explicitly stressed: "With worries and hopes, our citizens are watching us. Those from [conflict] areas are hopefully waiting [for a positive outcome]. War refugees running here and there, made up of various age groups, have had their hopes dimmed for quite a long time. This time, they are watching with fearful eyes on how things will turn out. We can't afford to forget their suffering."

Also during Suu Kyi's Thailand visits in June, an agreement on cooperation between the Thai and Burmese governments was reached to facilitate the return of Burmese refugees. During her visit, Suu Kyi publicly welcomed the refugees back and said they were Burma's responsibility. Later in June, the Burmese government announced it would repatriate 196 refugees from the border camps as an initial step, although there was no timeline attached.

The two concerned countries, international community and the United Nations are banking on the durable ceasefire that would enable to start a long process of repatriation program. But now it seems the ambitious program would have to wait much longer, with the escalation of the armed conflict producing more refugees coming from Karen State, as it is supposed to be a test case for international engagement, on repatriation in South-east Burma, that have the potential to contribute to such processes.

For now the repatriation would have to be shelved, if not totally abandoning it altogether, until there is durable peace with political settlement and genuine reconciliation become the order of the day.


To Hopeland and Back The 21st trip for the 21st Century Panglong - (Day-10)

Posted: 19 Sep 2016 12:17 AM PDT

Day Ten. Wednesday, 31 August 2016

 Focus on interests, not positions
The Global Negotiator

The opening ceremony is scheduled to begin at 10:00. But at 08:00 we are already there, as there are more than a
UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon
(Photo: Irrawaddy)
thousand participants, including honored diplomats from the international community, among which is the soon-to-be-outgoing UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, and security is understandably tight.

But nobody, except maybe myself, who always feels out of place in a ceremony, doesn't seem to mind.

The following are excerpts from the official translation of the speech made by the State Counselor, who (for the first time in my experience, which isn't much) is reading from a written text:
State Counselor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi (Photo: VOA)

  • The Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) is the first step not only toward peace, but toward the establishment of the long hoped for democratic federal union.
  • Ideological differences between NCA signatories and non-signatories could delay our path to peace. We will strive to bring all under the umbrella of the NCA, which constitutes a common agreement in order to avert misunderstandings and divisions.
  • We began preparations for today's conference on 9 May 2016. I would like to take
    Tatmadaw Senior General Min Aung Hlaing (Photo: Mizzima)
    this opportunity to pay tribute to the previous government led by former President U Thein Sein .
  • We all negotiated to enable the participation of both NCA signatories and non-signatories.
  • Many of all ages have had to flee their homes to avoid conflict, and it is long since their hopes have dimmed. They hardly dare to hope any longer. We must not forget their plight.
Listening to her, one inevitable question comes up: What's the difference between a federal democracy and a democratic federal Union?  
The next speaker whose speech is keenly anticipated is Senior General Min Aung Hlaing, the Tatmadaw's Commander-in-Chief. I hope I've got the following extracts right:
  • The six principles for peace (which include a demand for the ethnic armed movements to adhere to the 2008 constitution written by the Senior General Than Shwe led military junta)
  • Armed opposition based on racism and localism is an anathema to democracy
  • Our country has been accelerating its program to build up a multiparty democratic system since the completion of the 2010 general elections
  • The peace process must be implemented within a short time. If the peace process takes more time than needed, there will be more outside instigation, intervention and manipulation and then this will jeopardize confidence building measures which have already been achieved and there will be more frictions in the process, so I have to suggest that we implement the peace process speedily. (Mizzima translation)
I'm not surprised by his continual reminders of the six principles. At least he had, fooling all confident predictions by some EAO leaders, signed the NCA. Which is what counts.
However, some questions are also in order:
  • When he talks about racism, does he imply that the Burman majority that is both the government and the armed forces are not racist? (As the late Chao Tzang Yawnghwe once said: Shan nationalism is only a natural reaction to Burman nationalism)
  • Never once in his speech does he mention about a federal democracy (or democratic federal union), but only about a multiparty democracy. Is it just a careless oversight? (We are going to hear more about it during the coming days from his officers.)
  • Is he serious about concluding the peace process in a short time which is within 3-5 years, according to one of the resolutions read out at the first Union Peace Conference in January? (One of his officers is to take up on the matter on the last day of the conference, 3 September.)


The following are extracts from other speakers:
  • We now have a roadmap toward peace. What we need is another roadmap toward a federal union (Gen Mutu Saypoe)
  • A federal union is about coexistence through thick and thin ("cold and heat" are the words he uses). It's not about secession. (Gen N. Banla)
  • This is a historic occasion……which recalls the spirit of the original Panglong Conference convened in 1947 by General Aung San, the Father of Modern Burma.
The United Nations will remain your respectful partner as this process (toward reform, peace and stability) deepens. (UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon)

 Reading through this, one may not fail to notice that the UN chief had mistaken the father of the State Counselor as the convener of the 1947 Panglong. But, I guess, he being an outsider, we should be magnanimous about it.

A flurry of other meetings come in the wake of the ceremony, with which I won't bother the reader.

I will just end today's journal with comments from some delegates whom I speak to when I get back to our lodgings late in the evening.
  • Poorer management compared to the January conference.
  • It should be the President, not the State Counselor, who should open the Conference. And he, not she, should be hosting the dinner party.
I'm also informed there will be altogether 76 presentations, each lasting no more than 10 minutes:

1 September   33        presentations
2 September   33        Presentations
3 September   10        presentations
So let's see what awaits tomorrow.

Militias in Burma - A good report for reference

Posted: 18 Sep 2016 09:17 PM PDT

Acknowledgement

The author would like to acknowledge the many people who assisted in this project, particularly those who generously shared their thoughts and experiences about the many topics covered in this report. I would also like to thank my friends and colleagues who took the time to provide comments and feedback on earlier drafts of this report. These include Matthew Arnold, Patrick Barron, Kim Jolliffe, Paul Keenan, David Mathieson, Brian McCartan, Kim Ninh, Andrew Selth and Martin Smith. Finally, I would also like to express my appreciation to friends from Burma who assisted with translation and data collection.

About the Author

John Buchanan is a Ph.D. Candidate in the Department of Political Science at the University of Washington. His interest in Southeast Asia dates back over two decades. His most recent publication is

Developing Disparity: Regional Investment in Burma's Borderlands for the Transnational Institute.

About The Asia Foundation

The Asia Foundation is a nonprofit international development organization committed to improving lives across a dynamic and developing Asia. Informed by six decades of experience and deep local expertise, our programs address critical issues affecting Asia in the 21st century—governance and law, economic development, women's empowerment, environment, and regional cooperation. In addition, our Books for Asia and professional exchanges are among the ways we encourage Asia's continued development as a peaceful, just, and thriving region of the world. Headquartered in San Francisco, The Asia Foundation works through a network of offices in 18 Asian countries and in Washington, DC. Working with public and private partners, the Foundation receives funding from a diverse group of bilateral and multilateral development agencies, foundations, corporations, and individuals.

Preface

Understanding the history and role of militias in Myanmar's armed conflicts is a critical element in the country's ongoing peace process, but the study of these groups has generally been neglected, relative to the analysis of the military (Tatmadaw) and ethnic armed groups. Militias take many different forms in Myanmar, varying in size, allegiances and modes of operation. Though estimates of their numbers vary, all indications are that militia groups are present throughout conflict-affected parts the country, and can be highly influential armed actors in their areas of operation.

In light of this situation, The Asia Foundation is pleased to present this research report on Myanmar's militias. It provides the historical background and evolution of militias over time, offers a typology of the different types of militias operating in the country, and reflects on their contemporary role. Given the militias' longstanding existence and their varied allegiances, how they will be taken into account in the peace process needs to be considered by both national and international actors working to support a durable peace in Myanmar. In concluding, the author also draws on examples of peacebuilding in other countries, to better illustrate some of the challenges that may arise in addressing the role of militias as the peace process moves forward. We hope that this report will provide a useful contribution to illuminate a lesser known but important piece of the complex conflict situation in Myanmar.

This research paper is authored by Mr. John Buchanan, an independent researcher and doctoral candidate at the University of Washington, who specializes in civil conflict, state formation, and the politics of Southeast Asia. The report was generously funded by the United Kingdom's Department for International Development (DFID). The opinions expressed in this report are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of DFID or The Asia Foundation.

Dr. Kim N. B. Ninh
Country Representative
The Asia Foundation

Download PDF file : Militias in Burma - A good report for reference