Thursday, July 3, 2014

The Irrawaddy Magazine

The Irrawaddy Magazine


NLD Denounces Fake Statement on Mandalay Riots

Posted: 03 Jul 2014 05:27 AM PDT

NLD Denounces Fake Statement on Mandalay Riots

A fake statement with the NLD logo and letterhead that was shared by an anonymous social media user on Facebook on Wednesday. (Photo: Facebook)

The National League for Democracy (NLD) is calling for government action against an anonymous social media user who published a fake NLD statement with potentially inflammatory comments about religious unrest in Mandalay.

The statement—which included the NLD party logo and letterhead—was widely viewed on Facebook on Wednesday afternoon, blaming Buddhist mobs and a poor government response for two nights of violence in the country's second-biggest city.

"The NLD is fully backing the Muslims, and if Muslim properties are destroyed the NLD will help prosecute the Buddhist rioters," read the fake statement, which was shared by more than 300 Facebook users.

"The Muslim kalar have become victims, thanks to the lack of rationalism among the Burmese," the statement added, using a derogatory word for Muslims. "The government cannot properly handle the situation, which has been somewhat ignored, so it is very evident that the government is behind the riot."

"If Aung San Suu Kyi were president, this type of riot would not happen," it added, referring to the NLD chairwoman.

It is the latest attempt to brand the NLD as pro-Muslim, perhaps in a bid to alienate the party from voters in the Buddhist-majority country that has seen rising anti-Muslim sentiment over the past year. Last month, a fake photo of Suu Kyi in an Islamic headscarf was also widely shared on Facebook. Nationalist Buddhist monk Wirathu, based in Mandalay, has also accused the NLD of being pro-Muslim.

But while the fake photo of Suu Kyi had few ramifications, the fake NLD statement about the Mandalay riots has raised concerns among party leaders who fear the could lead to further outbursts of anger and violence. After two nights of rioting, at least two people have been killed, while 14 others were injured.

Political observers, lawyers and NLD supporters said use of the party's logo or letterhead for the purpose of agitation was an infringement of law.

"If we knew who did this, he or she could be brought to court for violating criminal laws as well as the Electronic Act," said NLD spokesman Nyan Win. "Faking our statement is fraud."

He added, "We believe this is a new strategy to attack us like before. We are seeing more attacks because the NLD's political organizing has improved and become more effective."

Earlier this week, the NLD announced that it had collected more than 3 million signatures for a campaign to end the military's veto over constitutional amendments.

"The fake statement obviously shows that the NLD is being attacked politically, nationally and racially," political commentator Yan Myo Thein told The Irrawaddy. He called on the government to investigate the fraud.

The fake statement was put out shortly after the NLD released a legitimate statement calling for caution to avoid further violence in Mandalay.

The NLD said the rioting that began on Tuesday night was caused by rumors. The party said it "urged the public to be careful because it worried about the possibility of further riots."

It called on the government to "take action immediately on those spreading riots in Mandalay, and to protect public security."

Nyan Win, the NLD spokesman, said attacks against his party would not stop their momentum. "Instead, our people will work harder to achieve our goals," he told The Irrawaddy.

The post NLD Denounces Fake Statement on Mandalay Riots appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Mandalay Authorities Impose City-Wide Curfew

Posted: 03 Jul 2014 05:12 AM PDT

Mandalay Authorities Impose City-Wide Curfew

Tin Tin Kyaw (3rd R) cries near the body of her husband Soe Min, a 51-year-old man who was killed in a recent riot, at a mosque in Mandalay. (Photo: Reuters)

MANDALAY — Mandalay District authorities have announced a night time curfew after two consecutive nights of inter-communal violence between Buddhist and Muslim residents rocked Burma's second biggest city and left two people dead and 14 injured.

Mandalay residents have to remain inside from 9 pm to 5 am and the curfew will take effect on Thursday night, according to an official announcement disseminated in the city. During these hours, gatherings of five people or more are prohibited.

"Anyone who fails to obey the order shall be detained through use of force and charged under existing laws," the announcement said.

The curfew was imposed by the head of Mandalay District Administration and will cover all six townships in Mandalay. The announcement said the curfew would help ensure the public's safety and rule of law as there had been clashes in the two previous nights.

Most shops in riot-affected Muslim areas remains closed and the situation remains tense. Authorities have deployed about 1,000 police on Tuesday to stem the unrest, but failed to prevent further clashes on Wednesday night.

The post Mandalay Authorities Impose City-Wide Curfew appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

DVB Reporter Zaw Pe Due to Be Released

Posted: 03 Jul 2014 04:39 AM PDT

DVB Reporter Zaw Pe Due to Be Released

Zaw Pe, a video reporter for the Democratic Voice of Burma, with his wife and child. (Photo: DVB)

RANGOON — Imprisoned Democratic Voice of Burma (DVB) reporter Zaw Pe is due to be released on Friday after his prison sentence was reduced from one year to three months by Magwe Division Court during an appeal against his sentence, DVB said.

"The district court rejected our appeal, but Magwe Division Court ruled for remission of the sentence in the case," Toe Zaw Latt, bureau chief of DVB said. "We assume that there is a positive intention to amend the sentencing."

"We think there will be no condition put on his release, as the case is barely a civil case," he added.

Zaw Pe, a video reporter for DVB, was sentenced to one year in prison on April 7 for trespassing at an education department office and disrupting the duties of a civil servant by a court in Magwe Division.

He was attempting to conduct an interview for a video report about Japanese-funded scholarships for local students when local officials objected.

A lawsuit was filed in 2012 by a Magwe township education officer as well as Win Myint Hlaing, the father of a student who brought the reporter to the department's compound.

Toe Zaw Latt said Zaw Pe had given prior notification when he visited the department and was not guilty of trespassing.

Under the former military regime, Zaw Pe spent two years in prison for filming a video report for DVB without a license.

The DVB bureau chief criticized the fact that criminal charges were brought against a journalist doing his job, adding, "We would like media personnel to be punished only under media laws."

"It's like a journalist is punished twice, under the existing [criminal] law and under media law. We don't want legal action [against journalists] under the Penal Code, there shouldn't be," he said.

"According the media law, only after a case is negotiated by the Press Council, can a [journalist] be punished according to the law," he said.

Zaw Pe's case is one of several criminal cases that authorities have brought against Burmese journalists in recent months, and concerns are growing that President Thein Sein's nominally-civilian government is seeking to curb media freedoms.

Last week, Special Branch officers visited the offices of several media organizations, including The Irrawaddy, supposedly to investigate the administration and finances of the organizations.

The post DVB Reporter Zaw Pe Due to Be Released appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

New Arakan Chief Minister Pledges ‘Zero Tolerance’ of Rohingya Smuggling

Posted: 03 Jul 2014 04:30 AM PDT

New Arakan Chief Minister Pledges 'Zero Tolerance' of Rohingya Smuggling

Gen. Maung Maung Ohn, then Burma's deputy border affairs minister, is seen in this file photo from 2010. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

RANGOON —Gen. Maung Maung Ohn, the newly appointed chief minister of Arakan State, vowed during his first speech to the state's legislature since assuming his new role that he would come down hard on anyone caught smuggling Rohingya Muslims into or out of the state.

The pledge, made on Wednesday, came after reports that two people had been arrested in the state's Ann Township after police there discovered eight Rohingyas hidden inside their vehicle. The two suspected smugglers, who were identified as children of a former police chief, were traveling to Rangoon at the time.

Under Burma's 1982 Citizenship Act, the Rohingya are not recognized as one of the country's 135 ethnic groups, rendering them effectively stateless. Among other restrictions placed on them, they are not allowed to leave Arakan State for other parts of the country.

Speaking in the state capital Sittwe on Wednesday, Maung Maung Ohn called the accused smugglers "traitors of their national race" and vowed to punish them to the full extent of the law.

Thet Tun Aung, a state legislator from the Arakan National Party, said the general promised to do his utmost to address the "Rakhine issue"—referring to the concerns of ethnic Arakanese Buddhists who say the Rohingya are illegal immigrants from neighboring Bangladesh—because it is an issue that affects the whole country.

"He [Maung Maung Ohn] said he would have zero tolerance of anyone who violated the country's citizenship laws," said Thet Tun Aung.

Wearing civilian dress despite being an active member of Burma's armed forces, Maung Maung Ohn greeted state lawmakers during his first day in the state assembly, where he was unanimously confirmed as the new state chief minister on Monday after being nominated for the position by the President's Office late last month.

The appointment initially met with resistance from Arakanese nationalists who opposed the idea of having an ethnic Burman lead the state, but the general has moved quickly to reach out to the state's Arakanese majority.

According to local sources, he will soon visit Mrauk-U and Kyauktaw townships in the state's north, where he will meet with farmers who say that their land was taken away from them by the Burmese military.

"A lot of local people are hoping that he will be able to help them get their land back," said Thet Tun Aung.

The post New Arakan Chief Minister Pledges 'Zero Tolerance' of Rohingya Smuggling appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Ex-Religious Minister Proclaims Innocence on Way to Court

Posted: 03 Jul 2014 03:13 AM PDT

Ex-religious affair minister Hsan Hsint proclaimed his innocence to assembled journalists as was he led to a court in Naypyidaw on Thursday, shouting: "I haven't embezzled a penny of state funds." (Photo: Citizen Journalist)

Ex-religious affair minister Hsan Hsint proclaimed his innocence to
assembled journalists as was he led to a court in Naypyidaw on
Thursday, shouting: “I haven’t embezzled a penny of state funds.”
(Photo: Citizen Journalist)

RANGOON — Former religious affairs minister Hsan Hsint was taken to court in Naypyidaw on Thursday to face corruption charges, but he told assembled reporters outside the court room that he was not guilty.

Amid tight security, he was brought for trial at Pubbha Thiri Township Court in the Burmese capital. A local journalist said Hsan Hsint loudly proclaimed his innocence as he was led into the building.

"Though my stand was correct, they said they will punish me as I didn't follow the orders of the president. I didn't embezzle even a penny from the state budget. I swear. I haven't done anything wrong," he reportedly shouted.

On June 19, Hsan Hsint was sacked by President Thein Sein for "not performing his duties efficiently." Subsequent local media reports claimed he had also been accused of misappropriating about 10 million kyats (US$10,000) from his ministry's budget for personal family interests.

He is being charged under the Penal Code Article 409 for criminal breach of trust and Article 109 for abetting a crime.

The religious minister's firing followed a controversial raid on a Rangoon monastery by the state-backed Buddhist clergy, which had been in an ownership dispute with a small group of monks who declined to leave the monastery.

The raid led to the arrest of five monks. They have since been released on bail. Local media reported that the minister had a disagreement with other cabinet members over the plan to raid the monastery.

The post Ex-Religious Minister Proclaims Innocence on Way to Court appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Burma Accepted for EITI Scheme, But NGOs Remain Concerned

Posted: 03 Jul 2014 02:51 AM PDT

Myanmar Accepted for EITI Scheme, But NGOs Remain Concerned

A map showing the winners of on and offshore oil and gas exploration blocks in Burma. (Image: Global Witness)

RANGOON — The Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), a global anti-corruption scheme, announced on Wednesday that Burma has been accepted as a candidate country. The decision means Burma has to comply with an international transparency standard for oil, gas and mining earnings in the coming years and marks an important step toward addressing corruption in the country.

"[Burma]'s admission to the EITI comes at a critical time as the country is now opening up its vast natural resources for foreign investment. By implementing the EITI, the government has made a commitment to the people of [Burma]: that they will have the right see how these resources are managed," EITI chair Claire Short said in a statement.

Zaw Oo, the government's national coordinator for EITI, said, "EITI gives us a useful tool to design our escape from the resource curse; and it is an important catalyst for ongoing reforms. We pledge to overcome many challenges facing the implementation of EITI standards."

Burmese civil society groups warn, however, that they have serious doubts over the government's commitment to ensuring a safe environment for NGOs that are supposed to participate in the international scheme.

EITI sets a global transparency standard for extractive industries to combat high-level corruption, and governments that want to join the international scheme are required to publish oil, gas and mining project payments in accordance with EITI stipulations.

The scheme recommends disclosure of details of company ownership, contract terms, state-owned extractive industries, and allocation of resource revenues. The EITI statement said Burma has committed to implementing these recommendations and will also reveal the ultimate ownership of companies that won the 2013-2014 oil and gas bidding round.

International NGO Global Witness criticized the oil and gas bidding last week and said it was marked by high levels of corporate secrecy, as only 13 of 47 companies responded to questions about ownership, with only two companies revealing who ultimately owned them. The UK-based transparency campaign group said such secrecy is often used to hide high-level corruption.

Joining EITI has been a key reform measure by President Thein Sein's government as it seeks to attract foreign direct investment and shake off Burma's reputation for large-scale corruption and mismanagement in extractive industries under the former military regime.

In March, Thein Sein said his government wanted to join EITI "to encourage responsible investments, [and] to ensure that investment related to extracting natural resources will not affect the environment and socio-economic situation."

For decades, Burma's rich resources, which comprise an estimated 2.5 trillion cubic meters of gas and 3.2 trillion barrels of oil reserves, abundant mineral wealth, jade and gemstones, large-scale hydropower potential and vast forests, were plundered by the military regime and its business cronies. Resource revenues were pumped into the military, or siphoned off and pocketed by senior officials, while education and health care spending was kept at a minimal level.

Oil, gas, mining, agro-industry and dam projects have also been tied to ethnic conflict and militarization, as much of Burma's resources are located in ethnic areas, while the projects often also have heavy social and environment impacts on local communities. EITI, however, focuses on revenue transparency and does not include requirements on addressing such project impacts, or the need for authorities to seek prior consent from communities.

In recent months, the government has worked with oil, gas and mining firms active in Burma as well as local civil society groups to prepare the country's application for EITI candidacy. Burma has now joined a group of 44 countries, including Indonesia and the Philippines, that are EITI candidates, and it could become a "compliant" EITI member by 2017. Currently, there are 29 full EITI member countries.

EITI, based in Norway, is supported by international governments, and candidate states can receive donor support for implementation of EITI requirements and the creation of laws, regulations and rules that promote revenue transparency. About 80 of the world's largest oil, gas and mining companies also take part in the scheme.

Civil Society Concerns, Scope of Transparency

Now that it has been accepted as a candidate, Burma is bound by a timetable to implement EITI requirements. It has to complete its first report within 18 months and will be reviewed for full compliance by Jan. 2, 2017.

Civil society involvement is central to EITI, and the government, private sector and NGOs are required to cooperate in a multi-stakeholder group that implements the EITI process. The multi-stakeholder group will have to agree on the exact scope of EITI transparency standards and whether it wants to apply these to other sectors beyond oil, gas and mining.

"We have to do a lot of work, but nobody is ready," Tayar Maung, national coordinator at The MyanmarAllianceforTransparencyandAccountability (MATA), told The Irrawaddy.

"We are not yet decided on what scope we are going to work with—the multi-stakeholder group will have more discussions. CSOs for the moment want to include oil, gas, hydropower and forests. The government seems ready to accept inclusion of oil, gas and some mining sectors, such as jade and gems."

Juman Kubba, of Global Witness' oil, gas and mining team, said, "Whether the scheme actually makes a difference depends on whether Burma is willing to go beyond bare minimum EITI."

"In the coming months, Burma has the chance to show it is serious about transparency by committing to an EITI which generates the information citizens need to hold government officials and companies to account," she said. "If that doesn't happen, there is a risk that EITI will be treated as a tick-box exercise which offers a veneer of reform behind which looting proceeds unchecked."

A key point of concern for Burmese NGOs is whether the government is committed to implementing EITI standards regarding civil society. The scheme requires governments to guarantee "an enabling environment" for NGO participation in EITI, respect NGO representatives' rights, and ensure open public debate on the scheme.

In the weeks leading up to the review of Burma's EITI application, Parliament eased restrictions on NGOs in the country. Lawmakers passed the Association Registration Law, which requires NGOs to register with the government but carries no punishments if they fail to do so. Parliament also amended the Peaceful Assembly Law, reducing prison sentences for unauthorized protests from six to three months.

MATA warned EITI's International Board in a letter earlier this week, however, that EITI conditions regarding civil society freedoms are not being met. "CSOs feel that there is no security for local-level CSOs activities in the whole country, especially in Shan and Karen States. Local CSOs receive constant threats and [are under] surveillance" by local authorities, the letter said.

MATA, an umbrella organization for 470 national and community-based NGOs, stopped short of asking the board to delay Burma's EITI application, but said the government had failed to guarantee necessary civil society freedoms.

The national government's commitment to improve an "enabling environment for CSOs is very weak in its implementation," the letter said, adding that a cabinet order stating that the government would work with NGOs on EITI was not sent to regional authorities, nor publicly released.

"We are requesting the government to fully implement [EITI conditions] and inform the public and authorities," said Tayar Maung, of MATA."They said yes, but they never apply it. That's why we are wondering, are they playing a game with us?"

MATA urged EITI to "put more pressure on the government to make happen the real EITI [process] and to create a real enabling environment for Myanmar CSOs."

Shwe Gas Movement director Wong Aung said NGOs are concerned that the government wants to become an EITI candidate to brandish Burma's international reputation, while dragging its feet on improving civil society freedoms, reigning in local authorities and addressing rights abuses and social impacts caused by extractive industries.

"We have tried to raise a series of issues related with extractive industries… but the government has not taken any steps to address these concerns in a meaningful time frame," said Wong Aung, who is a member of Burma's EITI multi-stakeholder group. "I do not think they have the political will to handle these problems in the short term. They are just trying to get a good international image to attract foreign direct investment through the EITI process. The government is very smart."

"The improvement of the resources sector is going to be a very long path," he added.

Multi-stakeholder group chairman Maung Maung Thein and government spokesman Ye Htut did not respond to emailed queries by The Irrawaddy about the NGOs' concerns.

The post Burma Accepted for EITI Scheme, But NGOs Remain Concerned appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

2 Dead as Religious Rioting Continues in Mandalay

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 11:18 PM PDT

Two motorcycle riders, including one carrying a stick, in downtown Mandalay amid clashes between Buddhists and Muslims. About 20 armed motorcycle riders drove along 35th and 84th streets on Wednesday night, smashing shop windows and attacking vehicles believed to be owned by Muslims. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

Two motorcycle riders, including one carrying a stick, in downtown Mandalay amid clashes between Buddhists and Muslims. About 20 armed motorcycle riders drove along 35th and 84th streets on Wednesday night, smashing shop windows and attacking vehicles believed to be owned by Muslims. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

MANDALAY — Rioting continued in Burma's second-biggest city on Wednesday night, leaving at least two people dead, a senior official said Thursday morning.

One Buddhist man and one Muslim man were killed on the second night of religious violence in Mandalay, according to Border Affairs and Security Minister Aung Kyaw Moe, who said at least 14 people have been injured since the clashes between Buddhists and Muslims first began Tuesday night.

Speaking at the Mandalay Division Police office, the minister told reporters that rioting broke out again in the city's downtown area at 11 pm on Wednesday night. A mob gathered near Zegyo market in Chan Aye Thazan Township, while motorcycle drivers carrying knives and sticks drove along 35th and 84th streets, smashing shop windows and attacking vehicles they believed were owned by Muslims.

More than 1,000 security officials were deployed to stabilize the situation, the minister said.

Buddhist Tun Tun was found beaten and wounded at about midnight after being stabbed with a knife, and he died on the way to the hospital, the minister said.

Muslim Soe Min, 49, was beaten to death at about 4 am by a mob at the corner of 83rd and 31st streets, according to a witness. He was reportedly attacked by the mob on his way to a mosque for morning prayers.

The minister said four people had been arrested for their alleged role in the rioting, and that the government did not currently have plans to impose a curfew in the city.

He added that the violence was initially sparked by an inflammatory post on social media, and he urged the public to be careful about what they write online.

Clashes between Buddhists and Muslims first broke out on Tuesday night, after a blogger claimed that a Buddhist woman was raped by her Muslim employers. The blog post, which had not been verified with the police, was shared online by more than 2,000 people, including nationalist Buddhist monk U Wirathu, who leads an anti-Muslim movement known as 969.

A lawsuit has been filed for the alleged rape, according to state-run media.

President Thein Sein did not directly comment on the rioting during his monthly radio address on Wednesday morning, nor did he lay out plans for the government's response.

He did, however, urge the Burmese public to avoid incitement of unrest for the sake of the country's political and economic reforms.

"As our country is a multi-racial and –religious nation, the current reform process will be successful only when stability is maintained through cooperation of all citizens by living harmoniously with one another," he said.

"For the reform to be successful, I would like to urge all to avoid instigation and behavior that incites hatred among our fellow citizens."

Mandalay Division Chief Minister Ye Myint called on religious leaders to collaborate with the government to settle the situation in the city, during a press conference at the divisional government office on Thursday morning.

Bouts of religious violence have broken out in several cities across Burma over the past year, but this is the first time rioting has hit Mandalay. In March 2013, anti-Muslim violence in the central Burma town of Meikhtila, near Mandalay, left about 40 people dead.

The post 2 Dead as Religious Rioting Continues in Mandalay appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Thai Military Government Looks to Neighbors for Support

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 09:26 PM PDT

Thai Military Government Looks to Neighbors for Support

Veera Somkwamkid, left, a Thai ultra-nationalist who was jailed in Cambodia for espionage and trespassing, arrives at Bangkok's Suvarnabhumi International Airport on July 2, 2014, accompanied by acting Thai Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow. (Photo: Reuters / Athit Perawongmetha)

BANGKOK — Thailand's military government is shoring up diplomatic ties with Asian neighbors to provide a counterweight to criticism from the West about its seizure of power in May and its reluctance to set an early date for a return to civilian rule.

In the latest move, acting Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow reassured Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen on Tuesday that Cambodian workers who had fled home after the coup, fearing a crackdown on immigrants, would be welcomed back.

He returned from Cambodia on Wednesday, bringing with him Thai activist Veera Somkwamkid, an ultra-nationalist jailed there on charges of espionage and illegal entry for pressing Thailand's claim to a disputed ancient temple on the border.

The May 22 military takeover drew swift international condemnation and both the United States and European Union have downgraded diplomatic ties.

The military's National Council for Peace and Order has played down these moves, focusing instead on strengthening its relationship with China and others in Asia.

Last month, a Thai army delegation visited China and Malaysia's defense minister came to Thailand, the first visit by a foreign minister since the coup. Burma's army chief is due in Bangkok on Friday.

The military authorities also claim support from Vietnam.

Veera received a hero's welcome at Bangkok's Suvarnabhumi airport on Wednesday from supporters shouting "Veera! Fight! Fight!" as he made his way through a media scrum.

Cambodia's pardon for the Thai activist suggests a thaw in relations between old foes and a 180-degree change in stance by veteran Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen.

Hun Sen rattled Thailand in 2009 when he appointed former Thai premier Thaksin Shinawatra as an economic adviser and refused to extradite him. Thaksin was ousted by the military in 2006 and fled Thailand to escape a graft conviction in 2008.

"This is a gentleman's agreement between Cambodia and Thailand's military government not to interfere in each other's politics," said Kan Yuenyong of the Siam Intelligence Unit think tank.

"Cambodia has no reason to interfere in Thailand right now but in the past Hun Sen used politics to manipulate the land dispute issue."

Thailand and Cambodia have been locked for decades in a dispute over land surrounding the Preah Vihear temple. The International Court of Justice ruled in 2013 that Cambodia had sovereignty over the immediate area around the temple.

"Regional neighbors in Asia know that it is of economic benefit to them to take a soft approach to the Thai military," analyst Kan added.

Dissent Stifled

Thaksin's sister, Yingluck Shinwatra, won a landslide election victory in 2011 but, after months of street demonstrations aimed at toppling her, she was forced to step down on May 7 when a court found her guilty of abuse of power.

Attempts by her government to secure Veera's release had proved unsuccessful despite cordial relations between Yingluck's government and the authoritarian Hun Sen, in power since 1985.

The junta has cracked down hard on dissent, briefly detaining hundreds of activists, journalists and politicians critical of the regime, a disproportionate number of them members of the pro-Thaksin "Red Shirt" movement.

On Tuesday, police released Sombat Boonngamanong, a Red Shirt activist who spearheaded an online campaign promoting flash mob protests against the military, after charges of lèse-majesté were brought against him.

Sombat has also been charged with instigating unrest and violating cyber laws and faces up to 14 years in jail if found guilty by a military court.

Thailand has some of the toughest lèse-majesté laws in the world forbidding criticism of the monarchy. Coup leader General Prayuth Chan-ocha, a staunch royalist, has made it clear that anti-royalist opinions will not be tolerated.

King Bhumibol Adulyadej, 86, the world's longest serving monarch, commands great respect and has semi-divine status. The monarchy is considered one of the three main pillars of the country along with Buddhism and the concept of nation.

The post Thai Military Government Looks to Neighbors for Support appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

China Bans Ramadan Fast in Muslim Northwest

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 09:17 PM PDT

China Bans Ramadan Fast in Muslim Northwest

Security forces stand guard along a street in Urumqi, capital of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, on July 4, 2010, the day before the first anniversary of ethnic rioting that killed around 200 people. (Photo: Reuters)

BEIJING — Students and civil servants in China's Muslim northwest, where Beijing is enforcing a security crackdown following deadly unrest, have been ordered to avoid taking part in traditional fasting during the Islamic holy month of Ramadan.

Statements posted Wednesday on websites of schools, government agencies and local party organizations in the Xinjiang region said the ban was aimed at protecting students' wellbeing and preventing use of schools and government offices to promote religion. Statements on the websites of local party organizations said members of the officially atheist ruling party also should avoid fasting.

"No teacher can participate in religious activities, instill religious thoughts in students or coerce students into religious activities," said a statement on the website of the No. 3 Grade School in Ruoqiang County in Xinjiang.

Similar bans have been imposed in the past on fasting for Ramadan, which began at sundown Saturday. But this year is unusually sensitive because Xinjiang is under tight security following attacks that the government blames on Muslim extremists with foreign terrorist ties.

Violence has escalated in recent years in Xinjiang. The ruling party blames violent extremists that it says want independence, while members of the region's Uighur ethnic group complain that discrimination and restrictions on religion, such as a ban on taking children to mosques, are fueling anger at the ethnic Han Chinese majority.

An attack on May 22 in the regional capital of Urumqi by four people who threw bombs in a vegetable market killed 43 people. On June 22, police in Kashgar in the far west said they killed 13 assailants who drove into a police building and set off explosives, injuring three officers. Authorities have blamed two other attacks at train stations in Urumqi and in China's southwest on Muslim extremists.

The government responded with a crackdown that resulted in more than 380 arrests in one month and public rallies to announce sentences.

The ruling party is wary of religious activities it worries might serve as a rallying point for opposition to one-party rule. Controls on worship are especially sensitive in Xinjiang and in neighboring Tibet, where religious faith plays a large role in local cultures.

On Tuesday, authorities in some communities in Xinjiang held celebrations of the anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party and served food to test whether Muslim guests were fasting, according to Dilxat Raxit, spokesman in Germany for the rights group World Uyghur Congress.

"This will lead to more conflicts if China uses coercive measures to rule and to challenge Uighur beliefs," said Dilxat Raxit in an email.

The ruling party says religion and education should be kept separate and students should not be subject to religious influences. That rule is rarely enforced for children of Han Chinese, who, if they have a religion, are mostly Buddhist, Daoist or Christian.

"Students shall not participate in religious activities; they shall not study scripts or read poems at script and choir classes; they shall not wear any religious emblems; and no parent or others can force students to have religious beliefs or partake in religious activities," said the statement on the website of the grade school in Ruoqiang County.

A news portal run by the government of Yili in the northern reaches of Xinjiang said fasting is detrimental to the physical wellbeing of young students, who should eat regularly.

In the city of Bole, retired teachers from the Wutubulage Middle School were called in to stand guard at mosques and prevent students from entering, according to a statement on the municipal party committee website.

Also in Bole, the Bozhou University of Radio and Television said on its website it held a meeting with working and retired minority teachers on the first day of the Ramadan to remind them of the fasting ban.

The forestry bureau in Xinjiang's Zhaosu county held an event the day before Ramadan at which party cadres signed a pledge they and their relatives would "firmly resist fasting," according to a statement on the website of the local party committee.

The Moyu Weather Bureau in the Hotan area said on its website that Muslim employees, both active and retired, were required to sign a letter promising not to fast.

The commercial bureau for Turpan, an oasis town in the Taklamakan Desert, said in a statement that civil servants are "strictly forbidden" to fast or perform the Salat prayer ritual in a mosque.

The post China Bans Ramadan Fast in Muslim Northwest appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Gene from Extinct Human Species Fortifies High-altitude Tibetans

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 09:08 PM PDT

Gene from Extinct Human Species Fortifies High-altitude Tibetans

With an average elevation exceeding 15,000 feet (4,500 meters), the Tibetan plateau is one of the least habitable places on earth. (Photo: Wikimedia)

WASHINGTON — How do Tibetans thrive in high-altitude, low-oxygen conditions that would make others wither? Well, they may have received some help from an unexpected source.

Scientists said on Wednesday many Tibetans possess a rare variant of a gene involved in carrying oxygen in the blood that they likely inherited from an enigmatic group of extinct humans who interbred with our species tens of thousands of years ago.

It enables Tibetans to function well in low oxygen levels at elevations upwards of 15,000 feet (4,500 meters) like the vast high plateau of southwestern China. People without this variant would be apt to develop thick blood, leading to high blood pressure, heart attacks, strokes, low-birth-weight babies and higher infant mortality.

This version of the EPAS1 gene is nearly identical to one found in Denisovans, a lineage related to Neanderthals—but is very different from other people today.

Denisovans are known from a single finger bone and two teeth found in a Siberian cave. DNA testing on the 41,000-year-old bone indicated Denisovans were distinct from our species and Neanderthals.

"Our finding may suggest that the exchange of genes through mating with extinct species may be more important in human evolution than previously thought," said Rasmus Nielsen, a computational biology professor at the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Copenhagen, whose study appears in the journal Nature.

Our genome contains residual genetic fragments from other organisms like viruses as well as species like Neanderthals with which early modern humans interbred. The researchers called their study the first to show that a gene from an archaic human species has helped modern humans adjust to different living conditions.

"Such exchange of genes with other species may in fact have helped humans adapt to new environments encountered as they spread out of Africa and into the rest of the world," said Nielsen.

Asan Ciren, a researcher with China's BGI genomics center, added, "The genetic relationship or blood relationship between modern humans and archaic hominins is a hot topic of the current paleoanthropology."

The researchers said early modern humans trekking out of Africa interbred with Denisovans in Eurasia en route to China. Their descendants harbor a tiny percentage of Denisovan DNA.

Genetic studies show nearly 90 percent of Tibetans have the high-altitude gene variant, along with a small percentage of Han Chinese, who share a common ancestor with Tibetans. It is seen in no other people.

The researchers conducted genetic studies on 40 Tibetans and 40 Han Chinese and performed a statistical analysis showing that the gene variant almost certainly was inherited from the Denisovans.

The gene regulates production of hemoglobin, a protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. It is turned on when blood oxygen levels drop, stimulating more hemoglobin production.

At elevations above 13,000 feet (4,000 meters), the common form of the gene boosts hemoglobin and red blood cell production, causing dangerous side effects. The Tibetans' variant increases hemoglobin and red blood cell levels only modestly, sparing them these effects.

The post Gene from Extinct Human Species Fortifies High-altitude Tibetans appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Hillary Clinton’s Take on ‘The Lady and the Generals’

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 06:00 PM PDT

Clinton US Burma policy

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, left, listens to Burma's pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi as they meet at Suu Kyi's house in Rangoon on Dec. 2, 2011. (Photo: Reuters / Soe Zeya Tun)

RANGOON — In her latest memoir, former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton describes her cherished personal relationship with opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and Washington's evolving ties with Burma, calling the United States' re-engagement with the former pariah state an example of "America at our best."

In "Hard Choices," a 656-page tome in which Clinton recalls her visits to countries around the world, an entire chapter is devoted to Burma, the only Asia-Pacific nation other than China to be afforded such prominence. Clinton charts a path in the chapter from nearly nonexistent diplomatic ties with Burma under the former military regime to US President Barack Obama's historic visit to Rangoon in 2012, and up through this April's controversial national census.

Clinton, who shepherded one of the 21st century's most dramatic and rapid reversals in bilateral relations as the United States' chief diplomat from 2009-2013, describes Burma's political reform process in largely positive terms, but notes that many reforms remain incomplete.

"It is sometimes hard to resist getting breathless about Burma," she writes. "But we have to remain clear-eyed and levelheaded about the challenges and difficulties that lie ahead."

A reappraisal of US foreign policy toward Burma came shortly after Obama took office in 2009, well before the installation of Burma's nominally civilian government in 2011 and less than two years after the former ruling junta cracked down lethally on Buddhist monk-led protests in Rangoon.

"I came into office convinced that we needed to rethink our Burma policy," Clinton writes, reflecting on more than 20 years of economic sanctions imposed by the United States.

Clinton's tentative steps toward normalizing relations in 2009 included visits to Burma by a US lawmaker and a senior State Department envoy, discussions with other Asian leaders, and ultimately the announcement of a new US orientation on the world's biggest diplomatic stage, the United Nations headquarters in New York.

"We had concluded that 'engagement versus sanctions is a false choice.' So going forward, we would use both tools to pursue our goals and reach out directly to senior Burmese officials," she writes.

Those goals included the release of political prisoners, including Suu Kyi, then under house arrest, and an end to ties with North Korea, as well as efforts at reconciliation with opposition groups.

By November 2011—despite many of these conditions not yet having been met—Clinton was on a plane to Naypyidaw to meet with Burmese President Thein Sein and ruling party lawmakers. She describes taking a stroll days later with Suu Kyi, released from house arrest one year earlier, at the opposition leader's lakeside home in Rangoon.

Less than one year after that, Obama too paid a visit to Thein Sein and Suu Kyi, and gave a speech at Rangoon University that stressed the importance of democratic governance and respect for human rights.

Today, with US businesses setting up operations in Burma and Obama expected to pay a visit later this year to Naypyidaw, a capital said to have been built in central Burma to protect against a US invasion by sea, the transformation from pariah to partner appears complete.

'Carrots and Sticks'

The decision by the Obama administration to re-engage with Burma has been accompanied by heated debate among human rights advocates, geopolitical analysts and entrepreneurs keen to tap the long forbidden market.

"I wanted the United States to play a constructive role in encouraging the better instincts of the new Burmese government, without rushing to embrace them prematurely or losing the leverage our strong sanctions provided," Clinton writes.

"There was a risk that the Burmese generals were playing us," she adds, a nod to the concerns of many who have cautioned against US re-engagement as too much, too soon.

That is a view shared by the US Campaign for Burma, a Washington-based advocacy group that has frequently criticized US policy toward Burma.

"We're now seeing where Clinton's wholehearted endorsement of an incomplete reform process has landed the US—forced to reconcile and stand beside an oppressive government conducting ethnic cleansing in one corner of the country and a full-blown war complete with torture and human rights abuses in the other," Dan McDevitt, communications coordinator at the US Campaign for Burma, told The Irrawaddy.

McDevitt said Washington had too eagerly given up leverage, such as economic sanctions, that could have been maintained to prod further reforms.

"With the arguable exception of the 2012 by-elections … no other condition on that list has been met yet," he said, referring to benchmarks of progress set by the United States. "Political prisoners remain behind bars, journalists continue to be imprisoned, the government's treatment of the ethnic minority Rohingya has significantly worsened, ties with North Korea remain unclear, and the conflict in Kachin State has recently intensified."

Differing from McDevitt's stance are those, including Clinton, who argue that deepening US engagement has been a catalyst for Burma's move toward democracy.

Murray Hiebert, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank, offered a less critical assessment of Clinton's Burma narrative.

"It's a pretty good, albeit somewhat rosy summary of developments in Myanmar [Burma], the reasons the junta launched the reforms, and the thinking in Washington as the US launched its rapprochement with the country," he told The Irrawaddy, while noting that attacks against Rohingya Muslims in 2012 occurred as the United States was ramping up engagement with the Burmese government.

"This is not to take away from the very important role the US under Obama and Clinton played in helping create space for key leaders in Myanmar to launch their reforms," Hiebert added. "Many of the biggest challenges the so-called reformers face in completing the process have come into much sharper relief since Clinton left office in early 2013 and completed her book."

The former secretary of state acknowledges that the changing US policy toward Burma was motivated by multiple factors, including the high-minded notion that "its millions of people deserved a chance to enjoy the blessings of freedom and prosperity" and the more pragmatic "outsized strategic implications."

"Burma was situated at the heart of Southeast Asia, a region where the United States and China were both working to increase influence," she writes, noting Burma's role in Washington's so-called "pivot" to Asia, a policy of deepening engagement in the Asia Pacific that has been a hallmark of the Obama administration's foreign policy.

Presidential Aspirants

Notably, Clinton makes no mention of Suu Kyi's inability to become president under the Burma's current Constitution, despite the former secretary of state's apparent fondness for the opposition leader.

Suu Kyi's hopes of one day serving as president took a hit last month, when a parliamentary committee charged with reviewing the Constitution voted against recommending amendments to a provision that bars anyone whose spouse or children are foreign nationals from assuming the office. Suu Kyi's late husband and her two sons are British.

At least one US official has come out unequivocally in favor of changing that clause, Article 59. US Ambassador to Burma Derek Mitchell early this year called the provision "a relic of the past," and less explicitly, the State Department said last month that it "believe[s] constitutional reform should pave the way for the Burmese to freely choose their president in a free and fair 2015 election."

McDevitt called Clinton's failure to reference Article 59 a "glaring omission."

The Office of Hillary Clinton did not respond to attempts for clarification on whether the former secretary of state considers Suu Kyi's presidential ineligibility to be a concern ahead of Burma's elections next year.

Clinton is seen as a likely frontrunner in the United States' own presidential election in 2016, though she has not revealed whether she will run for the post. Her memoir has been widely described by reviewers as a legacy-building exercise from a woman who is at least not ruling out the possibility of a presidential run.

Given that her time as secretary of state included the tumult of the Arab Spring and little progress on the intractable Israeli-Palestinian conflict or a bellicose North Korea, Burma is seen by some as one of few potential foreign policy victories that she might claim. McDevitt says that as a result, Clinton's analysis in the chapter, titled "Burma: The Lady and the Generals," amounts to "policy salvaging."

"If things go badly in Myanmar over the period before the US elections in 2016, Clinton may well be blamed," said David Steinberg, a Burma specialist and professor at Georgetown University in Washington, adding that he found her Burma appraisal "disappointing."

"There are no real discussions in this chapter of any nuance of US relations or Burmese history. … If people quote this as an understanding of Myanmar or current issues or relations, they are doing the country a disservice," he said.

The post Hillary Clinton's Take on 'The Lady and the Generals' appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Myanmar Needs Independent Media, Not ‘Public Service’ Propaganda

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 05:30 PM PDT

media freedom Myanmar

A woman sells newspapers in Rangoon. (Photo: Jpaing / The Irrawaddy)

Recently, I sat down with a small group of people, including some journalist friends, to talk about Myanmar's media landscape. One of the questions that came up was whether independent journalism had any future in this country.

Perhaps because we all wanted to have something helpful and constructive to say, we generally agreed that yes, independent journalism does stand a chance of surviving in Myanmar.

As a matter of fact, however, the reality on the ground doesn't really support this sanguine view.

Looking back, we can see that in the half century after the late dictator Gen. Ne Win seized power in 1962 and nationalized the country's newspapers, independent journalism was all but nonexistent here. Under military rule, state-run media disseminated a relentless stream of pro-junta propaganda, and private media—which returned after 1988—was heavily censored.

During that dark era, journalists who dared to report on the ruling regime's many misdeeds were routinely locked up. Press freedom was dead, and journalism could no longer be regarded as a real profession.

But even when the situation inside the country was at its most dire, the desire for reliable news and information never died. To meet this need, exiled media groups mushroomed outside the country, and broadcasters like the BBC, Voice of America and Radio Free Asia provided Myanmar-language services that helped to counter the lies of the official media.

Until the nominally civilian government of President U TheinSein started introducing media reforms in 2012, Myanmar journalists working abroad were barred from entering the country, and those already inside were effectively silenced. Then everything changed. The country's draconian censorship board was abolished, and in 2013, some private media groups were given permission to publish daily newspapers. Exiled media groups such as The Irrawaddy were also allowed to set up offices inside the country for the first time in decades.

As significant as these developments were, however, they offered no guarantee that the government was ready to see independent journalism take root again in Myanmar. And, indeed, what we have seen since strongly suggests that the Ministry of Information (MOI)—which once wielded the censorship board like a club to beat the media into submission—remains as committed as ever to controlling the non-state media sector.

This is why it comes as a surprise to many journalists struggling to survive in the "space" created by Myanmar's government that some Western-based media-freedom organizations have so heartily endorsed the country's still narrow reforms, and have even begun bolstering the capacity of the state's propaganda apparatus.

Spearheaded by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco), these efforts—being carried out in the name of turning The New Light of Myanmar, MRTV and other former junta mouthpieces into "public service media"—will serve only to make Myanmar's government more effective at manipulating the public. Meanwhile, other voices will continue to be drowned out.

Kyaw Zwa Moe is editor (English Edition) of
the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at kyawzwa@irrawaddy.org.

In theory, Myanmar could certainly do with a public service media that is genuinely committed to keeping the country's people informed. The problem is that almost all of the individuals now being trained by the BBC, the Associated Press, Kyodo News and other respected international news agencies have spent most of their careers fighting on the frontlines of the former junta's endless psychological warfare campaigns. Simply enabling them to do a better job of pushing the government's official line is the last thing the country needs.

If Unesco and the other partners in this enterprise of turning former military officials into "professional" journalists really want to help, they will have to do more than teach them how to perform a few superficial tricks that give the impression of greater openness.

Some observers have noticed that the English-language newspaper The New Light of Myanmar is no longer as crudely one-sided as it once was, and sometimes even reports on issues such as human rights abuses and land grabs (without going too deeply into why both are still endemic in this country). At the same time, however, the Myanmar-language state media continues to shy away from any subject that could easily lead to criticism of the government or the military. Evidently, what's good for the growing number of foreigners entering the country is not good for Myanmar's masses.

In 2012, when I met high-ranking officials from the MOI for the first time, I suggested to them that if they really wanted to create a genuine public service media, they shouldn't waste their time trying to transform the state-run media. It would be better, I said, to let media professionals create a new, independent public service media with the help of international media organizations.

Needless to say, my arguments didn't have much of an impact on their thinking. I can't say I'm surprised. Why, after all, would they give up their stranglehold on the media sector—making room only for a few crony-owned media groups such as Skynet (owned by the Shwe Than Lwin Company) and MRTV-4 (owned by the Forever Group)—when all they had to do was drop some of their more egregious habits and go through the motions of reforming themselves?

If you try to find independent media in Myanmar today, you'll soon see that there are only a handful of organizations that fit the description. And if you're concerned about the country's prospects of completing its transition to democracy, this should be a major worry. Without an independent media to monitor those in power, next year's election could prove to be as farcical as the one in 2010.

Actually, it would be quite easy to reestablish independent media in Myanmar. The country has a small army of fledgling journalists eager to do their part to restore their profession to its rightful place as one of the pillars of a democratic society. All they need is freedom and the support of experienced domestic and international journalists. The government wouldn't have to do a thing.

It certainly isn't the government's place to police the media and enforce its own "ethical standards" on a profession it has never really understood. If mistakes are made, they can be addressed through mechanisms established by experienced practitioners of the trade, not by bureaucrats.

Myanmar has no shortage of reporters—both trained professionals and "citizen journalists"—capable of uncovering facts that some would like to keep hidden. During the 2007 Saffron Revolution, and in the aftermath of Cyclone Nargis the following year, the ruling regime was unable to conceal its brutality and callous indifference to the loss of human life because of the courage of countless citizens who risked their lives and freedom to document the truth. With the right guidance—from qualified colleagues, not meddling officials—they could be an even more formidable force for good in the country's future.

Independent-minded journalists are an enormous asset to any democratic society, and if the international community truly believes that democracy is what Myanmar deserves and needs, it should invest in those who would be its best guardians. Supporting apparatchiks with press cards is a waste of time we can no longer afford.

Kyaw Zwa Moe is the editor of the English-language edition of The Irrawaddy. The article first appeared in the July print edition of The Irrawaddy magazine.

The post Myanmar Needs Independent Media, Not 'Public Service' Propaganda appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

‘We Wanted to Convey Through This Film That Nobody Wants Conflict’

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 05:00 PM PDT

human rights culture Myanmar

A poster for "The Open Sky," a documentary showing the human impact of the anti-Muslim violence that rocked Meikthila in 2013. (Image: Human Dignity Film Institute)

Phyo Zayar Kyaw, 28, is one of the three filmmakers who made "The Open Sky," a 20-minute documentary shot in Meikthila, a town in central Burma that witnessed horrendous, deadly clashes between Buddhists and Muslims in March 2013.

The film was supposed to be screened at the Human Rights Human Dignity International Film Festival in Rangoon on June 15-19, but was cancelled after criticism on social media from Burmese Buddhists, who claimed that it was too sympathetic to the predicament of Muslims. It was one of five films produced by students of Rangoon's Human Dignity Film Institute.

The film follows the life of a Muslim woman whose house was burned down during the anti-Muslim violence, but who refuses to leave Meikthila as she considers it her home. A Buddhist friend helps the woman during the conflict and the documentary shows their views of the conflict, and of each other.

Phyo Zayar Kyaw spoke to The Irrawaddy about the film's cancellation, the idea behind the documentary and the challenges he faced during its production.

Question: How do you feel about your film being cancelled at the human rights film festival?

Answer: We received warnings before the film festival that the film might be cancelled due to surging online social media hate speech, in fact, as I've said before, my partners and I are fully aware that this is a controversial topic. The final decision to cancel this film was made due to the organizers' fears that because of the sensitive state that the country is currently in, the screening of this film may generate unwanted conflict during the film festival.

The film festival is a great celebration of human rights, the first of its kind in Myanmar, which features 32 films produced by Burmese filmmakers and over 20 international films produced by different filmmakers from all over the world. There is so much hard work and labor involved in this film festival that it is unfair to everyone else involved if things go wrong just because of our film.

Q: What message did you want to convey through this film?

A: I think the main message we wanted to convey through this film is that nobody wants conflict. We wanted to portray and showcase the raw and human emotions of those who are inhabitants of conflict zones. It's ironic [that the film was cancelled] because we actually wanted to deter anger that people have towards each other and become more understanding of one another through this film.

It was meticulously designed to help people sympathize with one another, to make people watch someone else cry and empathize with their emotions and realize that nobody wants conflict, nobody gets out of a conflict without losses and suffering. That was what our film was aimed to do but now due to the outburst of social media hate speech, the film hasn't been screened anywhere yet. I believe that if the film was screened as planned, it would generate responses opposite to what we've seen now.

Q: What were some difficulties that you and other filmmakers faced in the production of the film?

A: We knew from the start that the topic of this project, which is growing religious tensions in Myanmar, is a controversial one that can potentially spark conflict. When we went to do the filming of the documentary in Meikthila, there were many people who were suspicious. Or let's just say curious, about what we were filming and why.

In the editing process of this film, we were extremely careful about including scenes that have the slightest potential of inciting anger in people and we ended up deleting many parts of the film that we actually liked. In our decision-making about various aspects of the film, we couldn't prioritize the quality of the storyline but, instead, had to place more emphasis on the balance and objectivity of our portrayal of the religious conflict.

Q: There are many who have criticized the film through social media, what would you like to say to them?

A: Frankly, I don't have much to say to them. From the time when the idea for this film was conceived we were very aware that the topic is extremely controversial, and thus we were very careful not to incite anger. To those who are criticizing this film without having even watched it, I really have nothing to say.

The post 'We Wanted to Convey Through This Film That Nobody Wants Conflict' appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

National News

National News


Violence breaks out in Mandalay

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 07:15 PM PDT

The death toll of Buddhist-Muslim violence in Mandalay now stands at two, with 13 people reportedly injured since tensions erupted on July 1.


New law to see private universities use state curriculum

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 02:49 PM PDT

Private universities will have to offer the same curriculum as state-run universities under a new education law, a senior official from the Department of Higher Education has told The Myanmar Times.

Leftover Tada-O airport land returned to farmers

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 02:44 PM PDT

More than 6000 acres of land taken for the development Mandalay International Airport has been returned to farmers but recipients are complaining that they have only received temporary rather than permanent ownership documents.

U San Sint protesters allege police intimidation

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 02:16 PM PDT

Leaders of a protest over the sacking and arrest of former Minister for Religious Affairs U San Sint have blamed police intimidation for a lower-than-expected turnout.

Locals seek to reclaim Paunglaung Stadium land

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 01:18 PM PDT

The Ministry for Sports is coming under increasing scrutiny for a 2011 deal to rent a local football stadium in Nay Pyi Taw to a football team owned by the minister's son.

MP urges govt to accelerate peace push

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 12:56 PM PDT

An ethnic Kachin MP has urged the government to speed up its peacemaking efforts, warning that there are concerns the process could break down unless momentum is maintained.

Two dead in Mandalay unrest

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 12:23 PM PDT

Two people have been killed during Buddhist-Muslim violence in Myanmar's second-largest city of Mandalay, police confirmed on July 3.


Wednesday, July 2, 2014

The Irrawaddy Magazine

The Irrawaddy Magazine


$17 Million Worth of Smuggled Goods Seized in Burma

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 05:43 AM PDT

smuggling

Trucks filled with goods cross the Friendship Bridge from Mae Sot in Thailand to Myawaddy in Burma. (Photo: Moe Kyaw / The Irrawaddy)

RANGOON — The Burmese government says it has seized more than 17 billion kyats (US$17 million) worth of smuggled imported and exported products over the past 20 months.

The seizures were made by more than 600 officials from the national police and the Ministry of Commerce who formed mobile teams in 2012 to inspect cross-border trade.

"Mostly we have seized products smuggled between China and Burma," Nyunt Aung, a leader of the mobile teams, told The Irrawaddy on Wednesday.

The most common illegal imports were frozen foods, home appliances and electronics, he said, while tobacco, alcohol, drugs and chemical products were less commonly smuggled into the country. From Burma, officials seized illegally exported jade, gems, forestry products and live animals, he added.

The mobile teams have set up checkpoints in Shan State border towns including Muse, Kengtung and Tachileik. There is also a checkpoint in the town of Tamu, along the Indian border, and at seven jetties in Rangoon.

Despite frequent illegal trade between Thailand and Burma, especially via Myawaddy in Karen State, no checkpoints have been established in Karen State and Mon State.

"We don't have checkpoints along the Thai- Burma border because there is not adequate security for us," Nyunt Aung said, adding that a checkpoint was established in Bago Division instead. "All trucks need to pass this checkpoint from the border station."

Of the 17 billion kyats in products seized over the past 20 months, 14 billion kyats of products were seized by mobile teams, while the remaining were seized by state and divisional government officials.

The mobile teams plan to expand their operations to the Rangoon airport, the Mandalay airport and a jetty in Mandalay. They will also set up checkpoints in Tenasserim and Irrawaddy divisions. A budget has been allocated to buy X-ray machines to aid inspections.

Since the 2011-12 fiscal year, about 3.9 billion kyats worth of jade and other gems have been confiscated, along with more than 1 billion kyats worth of smuggled timber and 971 million kyats worth of mobile handsets, according to statistics from the mobile teams.

The seized products are inspected and passed on to relevant government ministries, which auction many of the goods off to the public. In other cases, goods are disposed of completely.

"Some frozen imported foods need to be destroy at once before they are handed to consumers, and also some unsuitable snacks imported from China need to be destroyed before they reach Burmese children," Nyunt Aung said.

Last year, mobile teams began raiding retail warehouses in Rangoon and Mandalay to investigate the legal status of imported alcohol, tobacco and preserved frozen foods.

Burma's import and export law includes punishments of up to three years in prison for illegal importers and exporters.

The Ministry of Commerce allows cross-border traders to legally import 10 million kyats worth of goods weekly if they pay a tax. Legal trade is increasing with China and Thailand, according to the Ministry of Commerce, which reported US$18.4 billion worth of traded goods in the 2012-13 fiscal year compared with $24.9 billion in the 2013-14 year.

"As long as we do strict inspections at our checkpoints, total legal border trade volume will continue to increase," Nyunt Aung said.

The post $17 Million Worth of Smuggled Goods Seized in Burma appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Top KNLA General’s Toyota Land Cruiser Seized

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 05:18 AM PDT

KNLA Land Cruiser

A picture of Saw Johnny's Toyota Land Cruiser. (Photo: Facebook / Mahn Myo Myint)

RANGOON — A car owned by the commander-in-chief of the Karen National Liberation Army (KNLA) was seized by the Burmese government in Rangoon less than three weeks after a meeting between a delegation he led and President Thein Sein in Naypyidaw, according to Karen sources.

The sources said Gen. Saw Johnny's car was seized on June 23 on Kabaraye Pagoda Road in Rangoon. His son was behind the wheel at the time, on an errand for his father.

The car, a Toyota Land Cruiser, had no import license and was valued at about 70 million kyats (US$71,000), according to Saw Moe Myint, a Karen community leader in Rangoon.

"He [Saw Johnny] has already provided an explanation," said Saw Moe Myint, a Karen community leader with close ties to the KNLA's political wing, the Karen National Union (KNU). "He will not take it back as the car had no permit. His son was driving the car when it was seized,"

A KNU liaison officer in Myawaddy confirmed that the commander-in-chief's car was seized according to Mahn Myo Myint, a border-based Karen who is close to the KNU.

In a post on his Facebook account, Mahn Myo Myint said Saw Rose, a KNLA colonel who also serves as a liaison officer, told him that the KNU delegation had used the car to travel around Naypyidaw when they met Thein Sein and Burma Army commander-in-chief Snr-Gen Min Aung Hlaing early in June.

"The government offered car permits to the KNU already. Where are those car permits being used? They have the right to seize it, for driving the car without permits," said Saw Moe Myint.

Ethnic armed groups in Burma have received hundreds of car import permits over the last year from the government, as Naypyidaw has endeavored to achieve a long-sought "nationwide ceasefire agreement." Luxury car permits can be sold for as much at $100,000.

The KNU signed a ceasefire agreement with the Burmese government in 2012. The Karen News Group reported on Wednesday that a fresh clash broke out between KNLA and government troops on Saturday, killing one government soldier and wounding another.

One soldier from the KNLA was killed on June 14 when government troops attacked a KNLA outpost in Tenasserim Division. It was the most significant armed confrontation between the two sides since the ceasefire was signed.

The post Top KNLA General's Toyota Land Cruiser Seized appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Thai Court Awards Abused Karen Girl $140K in Compensation

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 05:13 AM PDT

human rights abuse Thailand

Thai reporters photograph a 12-year-old Karen girl who suffered extreme abuse at the hands of a Thai couple last year. The Thai prosecutor has thus far failed to open a criminal case against the perpetrators. (Photo: Pattaya Daily News)

A Karen girl who suffered horrific abuse while working as a maid for a Thai couple in Kampaeng Phet town, Thailand, has been awarded about US$143,000 in compensation by a local court, a Thai human rights worker said.

The Thai prosecutor, however, has not yet opened a criminal case against the perpetrators, who have fled.

Preeda Tongchumnum, the assistant to the secretary general of the Human Rights and Development Foundation (HRDF), said Kampaeng Phet Provincial Court ordered the accused Nathee Taengorn and Rattanakorn Piyavoratharm to pay the compensation sum (4,603,233 Thai baht) on Monday as the victim's lawyers had demanded.

"The couple is still at large, but lawyers will investigate all of the employers' properties to compensate her," said Preeda. It remains unclear whether the couple, which ran a dog-selling business, has enough assets to generate the compensation the court awarded.

Preeda said the couple remains on the run and Thai police had made no progress in tracking them down, adding, "We need the police officers to work harder to find this couple."

HRDF helped the 12-year-old, ethnic Karen girl file a civil case complaint after she managed to escape from her abusive employers on Jan. 31 last year.

The young girl suffered extensive damage done to her skin through repeated scalding allegedly inflicted by the couple, whom she accused of abducting her five years ago and forcing her to work as a house maid.

Poilice investigated Nathee Taengorn and Rattanakorn Piyavoratharm for child abuse, child labor and illegal detention. Despite the seriousness of the charges, the Thai court released Nathee Taengorn and Rattanakorn Piyavoratharm on bail last year and the couple has since fled.

Although more than a year has passed since the girl fled, the Thai prosecutor has failed to open a criminal case against the couple.

"In the criminal case, police officers already have proved their findings to the prosecutor. Now the investigation file is in the hands of the public prosecutor. As of now, they [the couple] are not present and not arrested, and there is no criminal lawsuit against them," Preeda said.

It remains unclear why the Thai prosecutor has not yet opened a criminal case to prosecute those responsible for the horrific abuse of the child, but her status as an unregistered migrant from Burma could have affected the case as Thai authorities are sometimes loath to act in defense of migrants.

Millions of poor migrants from Cambodia and Burma have entered Thailand in search of a better life and many cross into the country illegally, leaving them vulnerable to labor abuse by Thai employers and with little legal recourse in case of abuses.

The Karen girl continues to receive healthcare treatment for her wounds, some of which have caused lifelong health problems, at Mahidol University's Ramathibodi hospital in Bangkok.

Her left arm was damaged because of continuous abuse and she was unable to bend it towards the body or to stretch it. She has received corrective surgery for her arm, while also undergoing psychological treatment by a pediatrician and psychologist for the mental trauma she suffered.

"She is still being taken care of at a [government] shelter in Kampaeng Phet, but she goes to Bangkok hospital whenever the doctor calls her for treatment," said Preeda, adding that the victims' parents continue to work in the town.

"She cannot make a 100 percent recovery, but the doctor will help her to move her body like any other person," said Preeda, adding that the considerable compensation sum was awarded because the young girl must endure life-long health conditions.

"Compensation is not just about the damage happened before, it is also for future cost, such as medical treatment and things that she has lost, like her beauty…. She can have a baby but her ability to breast feed maybe not possible as she lost such organs due to abuse," Preeda said.

"I think it is very good precedent for those who want to bring lawsuit against perpetrator," she said about the case.

The post Thai Court Awards Abused Karen Girl $140K in Compensation appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Travel Restrictions Tighten for Burmese Refugees in Thailand

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 04:57 AM PDT

Thailand refugees

Two boys play with a cane ball at the Mae La Oon refugee camp in Mae Hong Son Province, Thailand. (Photo: Saw Yan Naing / The Irrawaddy)

RANGOON — The Thai junta, which has been ruling the country under martial law since May 22, has reportedly stepped up restrictions on the movement of more than 120,000 Burmese refugees living in camps along the Thai-Burma border.

Speaking with The Irrawaddy on Tuesday, Saw Honest, chairman of the Mae La refugee camp, said those restrictions included a general ban on travel outside the camps and a curfew.

"Refugees are banned from leaving the camp to seek jobs. Refugees are banned from leaving their homes from 6 pm to 6 am," he said. "Only those who have special conditions such as medical treatment or other emergency cases can travel, but need to seek official permission.

"Respective Thai security units at every camp informed us about the regulations. We are not allowed to go outside the camp, refugees have been warned not to engage in logging and drug dealing," added Saw Honest, who oversees the administration of Mae La, the largest Thai border camp, where some 40,000 Burmese refugees reside.

"Those who violate the rules will be punished. And for those who repeatedly violate the rules, their names will be deleted from refugee camp [registries], and they will no longer be allowed to live in the camp, and they may even be deported back to Burma," he added.

Saw Honest said refugees with special circumstances requiring travel outside the camps, such as for education or health reasons, were required to seek official permission from the respective Thai security units at the camps before traveling beyond their confines.

"We have a problem with the restrictions," Saw Honest said. "But we can't do anything now as it is the order of the Thai army. We may sort it out to ease the restrictions later because it is not a good time to do it now."

He said the restrictions had been communicated to refugees after a meeting between local Thai authorities and community-based organizations in Mae La and other camps on Tuesday.

"We held a meeting and informed the refugees about the rules. The plan just started today. But we don't know how long it will last, as they didn't tell us. I think it might last until next election," Saw Honest said. The Thai junta, which has branded itself the National Council for Peace and Order, has said it plans to hold an election in October of next year.

The orders come amid an ongoing reform program enacted by the junta that has included a sweeping crackdown on undocumented migrant workers that has forced more than 200,000 Cambodian laborers to return home. Hundreds of Burmese migrant workers have also been scrutinized, detained and deported back to Burma since early June.

The latest development is likely to affect daily life for tens of thousands of Burmese refugees, some of whom have lived in the camps for 25 years—a span during which Thailand has seen three coups. There are nine refugee camps spread across the Thai-Burma border.

Duncan McArthur, partnership director of The Border Consortium (TBC), a nongovernmental organization that has been providing humanitarian aid to the Burmese refugees for more than 20 years, told The Irrawaddy on Tuesday that Thai authorities were applying restrictions already on the books.

"TBC understands that the Thai district authorities have been ordered to enforce existing regulations more strictly, which will include restricting refugee movements outside of camps. Refugees with special circumstances will still be able to apply for permission to travel.

"District authorities in Tak province have called a series of meetings with UNHCR [UN High Commissioner for Refugees] and NGOs this week to clarify the situation," McArthur said. "However, we understand that there will be no change in policy relating to the provision of humanitarian assistance to refugees."

He said the TBC was not aware of any plans for Thai authorities to conduct identity checks at the camps. "Refugee status determination procedures have essentially been suspended since 2005, and we are not expecting official screening processes for unregistered refugees to resume any time soon," according to McArthur.

But Ye Min, a Burmese refugee at the Nu Po border camp, claimed that screening, official or otherwise, would be taking place.

"They [Thai army] want to know how many people are real refugees and how many people illegally came to stay in the camp and lack proper documents," he said.

Ye Min added that there were fears among the refugee population that those without proper documents, such as UN registration cards recognized by the Thai government, would be deported. Rumors were circulating that even UN cardholders would be subject to deportation or would have their status as a recognized refugee revoked if found traveling or residing outside the camps, Ye Min claimed.

Meanwhile, the UNHCR held a meeting on June 27 with Karen community-based organizations including the Karen Refugees Committee, Karen Women's Organization, Karen Youth Organizations, and Karen Office for Relief and Development (KORD), seeking opinions from refugees about the ongoing peace process between the Burmese government and ethnic armed groups.

Asked about claims of impending refugee screenings, UNHCR spokeswoman Vivian Tan told The Irrawaddy on Tuesday that the UN refugee agency had not been informed of any such plan.

Led by Thailand's Internal Security Operations Command (ISOC) and attended by representatives from four provinces including Tak, as well as NGOs, the UNHCR and other Thai authorities, a three-day meeting was held from June 17-19 in Mae Sot, Thailand, to discuss repatriation plans for refugees on the Thai-Burma border.

Over the last three years, the Burmese government and most ethnic armed groups have signed bilateral ceasefire agreements. Now, amid ongoing negotiations for a nationwide ceasefire accord, discussions among Thai authorities and aid groups on the border have turned to the eventual return of Burmese refugees to their homeland.

Thai authorities' previously stated policy on the refugees is that they would be allowed to return to Burma on a purely voluntary basis.

McArthur said TBC was not aware of any change regarding that stance.

"TBC's independent assessment remains that the conditions are not yet conducive for a voluntary return of refugees nor their sustainable reintegration in safety and with dignity," he added.

The post Travel Restrictions Tighten for Burmese Refugees in Thailand appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

5 Injured in Mandalay Unrest, Damage Limited: Police

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 03:54 AM PDT

Riot police charge on 26th (B) Road of Mandalay on Tuesday evening. (Photo: Teza Hlaing / The Irrawaddy)

Riot police charge on 26th (B) Road of Mandalay on Tuesday evening. (Photo: Teza Hlaing / The Irrawaddy)

MANDALAY — Five people were injured during clashes between Buddhists and Muslims that broke out in Mandalay on Tuesday night, a senior police official says.

Lt-Col Zaw Min Oo of the Mandalay Police Force said three Buddhists, one Muslim and one police officer were hurt during rioting in Burma's second-biggest city.

"They are hospitalized and not in serious condition, and an investigation is under way to punish anyone involved," he told reporters on Wednesday.

"We used rubber bullets to fire three warning shots to disperse the crowd last night," he added.

More than 1,000 police had been deployed to stop the riots.

Despite attacks on Muslim-owned properties in the city, the rioting caused relatively less destruction compared with previous religious violence elsewhere in Burma. According to police officers, 11 cars were damaged while some homes and shops were pelted with stones. No religious buildings were destroyed.

On Wednesday afternoon, the normally busy downtown area was quiet, with shops closed and barricades set up. Heavy security forces were deployed along 26th Street, near the scene of the rioting.

Businesses were open in other parts of the city.

"We want a normal life and we don't want any trouble," a Mandalay resident told The Irrawaddy.

"If something bad happens, all people here in Mandalay will surely suffer. Plus, it could hurt the image of our city."

The post 5 Injured in Mandalay Unrest, Damage Limited: Police appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Anti-Myitsone Lawyers to Travel to China

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 03:47 AM PDT

Chinese investment

Lawyers from the Myanmar Lawyers Network stage a demonstration in downtown Rangoon in 2012 to protest the sale of colonial courthouse buildings to hotel consortiums. The lawyers have also opposed the Chinese-backed Myitsone dam and Letpadaung mine. (Photo: The Irrawaddy)

RANGOON — Burmese lawyers who have campaigned against a Chinese-backed dam project in northern Burma will travel to China next week to inspect Chinese projects there.

The Myanmar Lawyers Network, which has opposed not only the Myitsone dam project, but also the Chinese-backed Letpadaung copper mine, will travel to Beijing next Wednesday, according to the network's joint secretary, Thein Than Oo.

The 10-day trip is part of an exchange between Burmese and Chinese lawyers, organized by the China-based Center for Legal Assistance to Pollution Victims (CLAPV) in collaboration with an American Quaker organization that provides training to Southeast Asian environmentalists.

As part of the exchange, Chinese lawyers from CLAPV visited Burma in May, studying the environmental impacts of four projects, including the Letpadaung mine in Sagaing Division and the Thilawa Special Economic Zone near Rangoon.

"The purpose of their visit was to study the impacts of Chinese investment abroad," Thein Than Oo told The Irrawaddy.

The Burmese delegation to China will include four lawyers from the Myanmar Lawyers Network and three other lawyers who focus on land rights and environmental issues. They will visit the sites of state-backed investment projects in China, most likely including Wanbao project sites.

Wanbao is the Chinese company that is backing the Letpadaung mine in Burma, along with the Burmese government.

"We want to know if their projects [in China] are running in accordance with international laws, and whether they have complied with environmental standards," Thein Than Oo said.

He said the Burmese delegation would also speak with the Chinese lawyers from CLAPV, to share concerns about the Myitsone and Letpadaung projects.

CLAPV has won more than 30 lawsuits against the Chinese government in favor of people who have been negatively affected by big investment projects.

The Myanmar Lawyers Network says it is preparing to file its own lawsuit against Wanbao and the Canadian company Ivanhoe Mines, which sold its shares in the Letpadaung project to Wanbao in 2010.

The post Anti-Myitsone Lawyers to Travel to China appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

What Australian FM Bishop Must Do in Burma

Posted: 02 Jul 2014 02:38 AM PDT

When Julie Bishop arrives in Burma this week for her first visit as Australia's foreign minister, she may be hoping to find a model for peaceful democratic transition from decades of military rule. Instead, she'll find a shaky, uneven reform process led by a quasi-civilian government that's already showing deep stress fractures.

The top-down reform process led by the former army general turned President, U Thein Sein, was initially welcomed for its surprising vigor: the release of political prisoners including Aung San Suu Kyi, a major overhaul of the legal system, a rigorous parliamentary structure (albeit one held hostage by a military quota) and the signing of more than 15 ceasefire agreements with ethnic rebels after six decades of civil war. The announcements were swiftly followed by an increase in international aid and investment, the lifting of sanctions, and high-profile visits by almost every key world leader.

Yet initial optimism is quickly fading as the Burmese government back pedals on its early promises. Burma's media is being intimidated, the country's military is muscling in on delicate peace negotiations, widespread land grabs are fueling rural discontent, legal curbs have been placed on peaceful assembly and association, and there is continued fighting in the north between the Burmese army and ethnic rebels, despite a ceasefire.

The government and military are being increasingly obtuse on amending clauses in the constitution that prohibit Suu Kyi's eligibility to be president and, crucially, have ignored demands from certain ethnic groups for greater autonomy. Everything points to a showdown between the government and Suu Kyi's party, the National League for Democracy, a confrontation that can severely destabilize Burma ahead of next year’s national elections.

More disturbingly, both Buddhist ultra-nationalism and anti-Islamic hate speech are on the rise, emboldened by prominent monks who urge the government to restrict inter-faith marriage, religious conversions, family planning and polygamy, all of which will adversely affect Burma's sizeable Muslim minority.

In western Burma, the persecution of the Rohingya Muslim minority has intensified following communal clashes in 2012 that killed hundreds and forced 180,000 people from their homes. They now live in wretched conditions, crammed into camps where the Burmese authorities are able to regulate foreign aid sent to them. A flawed nationwide census in March, which Australia helped to fund, cynically excluded the Rohingya.

Bishop is flying into a tougher bilateral relationship than one would have forecast a year ago.

Australia's relations with Burma have generally balanced practical engagement for democratic change with consistent criticism

David Scott Mathieson. (Photo: HRW)

David Scott Mathieson. (Photo: HRW)

of the appalling human rights abuses committed during military rule. Australia has been a generous aid donor, providing assistance to refugees on the Thai-Burma border, resettling thousands of long-term refugees in Australia, and helping fund the country's health and education sectors, so degraded after decades of inept military governance.

But as a generous donor and investor, Bishop should tell Thein Sein his bid to reform Burma will be derailed unless he addresses several key rights issues.

Her first message needs to be that ongoing mistreatment of the stateless Rohingya is unacceptable. Of course, Australia's own appalling record on asylum seekers will render these concerns hypocritical, so Bishop should remind Burma that its repression of the Rohingya is fuelling a growing exodus that's affecting the whole region: 86,000 Rohingya have fled to Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia and Australia since 2012.

The Australian government has been far too timid on the Rohingya issue to date: when Immigration Minister Scott Morrison went to the country in February he visited camps, but failed to make any public statements calling on Burma to address the abuses from which the Rohingya are fleeing.

Bishop has said women's empowerment will be a key priority of her visit. As such, she should raise concerns over proposed religious laws, especially a draft marriage bill that will restrict interfaith marriage. Under the proposed law, non-Buddhists who fail to convert to Buddhism before marrying a Buddhist, or don't seek written consent from the parents of the bride, face a 10-year prison term. Bishop should make it clear that such laws are not only discriminatory, but will further inflame inter-communal hatred.

Australia's aid package also includes assistance to Burma's lucrative yet opaque and corrupt mining sector, which has bred a litany of concerns over land grabs and environmental damage. As a recent report from Global Witness has highlighted, there is too little transparency in Burma's extractive industry and Australia's assistance should be designed to compel this sector to become genuinely rights respecting and open, and ultimately benefit more than just a handful of foreign investors and those with military connections.

Bishop should make it clear that, while Canberra will continue to support genuine reform, if Burma allows hatred, violence and exclusion to flourish unchecked, the very reform process Australia is investing in will be derailed.

David Scott Mathieson is a senior researcher in the Asia Division of Human Rights Watch. This article first appeared in The Sydney Morning Herald on July 1, 2014.

The post What Australian FM Bishop Must Do in Burma appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Security Tight in Mandalay after Outbreak of Communal Violence

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 10:40 PM PDT

communal violence in Burma

A crowd gathers at the corner of 27th and 82nd roads in Mandalay during a clash between Buddhist and Muslim communities on Tuesday evening. (Photo: Teza Hlaing / The Irrawaddy)

MANDALAY — More than a thousand police have been deployed in central Mandalay after clashes between Buddhists and Muslims left more than three people, including one policeman, injured late Tuesday night.

Police officials declined to comment on the situation, but hundreds of barricades could be seen along 26th Street, from the southwest corner of the moat surrounding Mandalay Palace west to Zegyo market, where the clashes took place.

Galoneni Sayadaw and other leading Buddhist monks from Burma's second largest city attempted to calm down the angry mobs, but without much success.

"We tried our best, but they would not listen. Some of them were drunk and hard to control. Whatever happens to them depends only on their own behavior. We just don't want to see Mandalay burn because of racial and religious hatred," Galoneni Sayadaw told reporters at the scene.

As the riot spread late into the night, angry men carrying canes and bricks were seen wandering along 26th Street, between 86th and 81st Streets, where the majority of the city's Muslims live.

Rioters from both sides used slingshots, stones and pieces of broken brick and concrete to attack each other. When the police came to control the situation, they were accused of siding with the Muslims and pelted with a shower of stones.

Angry Muslim men also threw bricks at police, resulting in minor injuries to two officers. The windshields of some nearby vehicles were also smashed.

Some people, including a couple of monks, prevented journalists from taking pictures, in

some cases forcibly removing memory cards from their cameras. They accused the journalists of bias because they were only taking photos of Buddhist rioters.

The mobs were finally dispersed at around 3 am on Wednesday after more police were deployed along the road.

Stones and broken bricks still covered 26th Street after dawn on Wednesday morning, and a number of signboards had been destroyed. Some old tires that rioters had set on fire were also still smoldering.

Witnesses said the clash began at around 10 pm on Tuesday after a group of Muslim men reportedly slashed three Burmese people on 83rd Street, between 25th and 26th streets.

"We were driving along 83rd Street when about 10 Kalar men carrying swords suddenly ran toward us and started slashing people on the road. My friend's son, on another motorbike, hurt his shoulder and we had to run for our lives," said a Buddhist woman, using a derogatory term for Muslims living in Burma .

The woman, who asked not be named, said the boy and two other injured men were sent to hospital when the police arrived and an angry mob suddenly appeared.

"People told us later that the men with the swords were Muslims, but I don’t know what happened. By the time we had escaped, the angry mob, carrying bamboo canes, sticks and stones, had already gathered and started throwing stones at the police," the woman added.

Riot Fueled by Facebook Rumors?

Although the cause of the initial attack is unknown, it is believed to be linked to reports that have spread widely on Facebook in recent days that a Buddhist maid had been raped by her Muslim employers.

Since the rumors first started to spread on June 28, there have been calls to destroy a teashop owned by the brother of the woman's employers.

By June 30, fears of an outbreak of violence prompted police to guard the predominantly Muslim neighborhood where the teashop is located. This in turn attracted large crowds of Muslim men, who were later persuaded by the police and Muslim elders to return to their homes.

According to the initial report, the maid was raped while traveling to Naypyidaw with her employers. The incident was reported at a police station in Pyinmana, near where it allegedly occurred.

The owner of the teashop told reporters that his two brothers had been charged with rape and that police in Yamethin Township were searching for them. However, the two accused men fled before they could be arrested, saying they did not believe the case would be handled fairly.

At this point, U Wirathu, a firebrand Buddhist monk who has been accused of stoking anti-Muslim sentiment in Burma through his Buddhist nationalist 969 movement, called the owner of the teashop and told him his brothers should be prepared to face justice.

"He said that if they were really men, they would be willing to face the truth. Later, he called the wife of one of my brothers and told her he would tear down the earth to find them," the teashop owner said.

U Wirathu later denied making such statements. Speaking to The Irrawaddy on Tuesday evening, he said he only advised the teashop owner on how to resolve the tensions peacefully.

"I called him, but didn't say anything threatening. I just said that things would only get worse if they [the brothers] didn't come forward and explain what happened," said U Wirathu.

He added that he first learned of the rape incident online.

"I read about it on the Thit Htoo Lwin blog and didn't trust it at first. But later we found out that the girl was being kept in protective custody at Yamethin police station and yes, the case was registered under the rape act," he said.

However, the wife of one of the accused said they do not have maid and that her husband was not traveling to Naypyidaw on the day the rape was reported to have occurred.

The post Security Tight in Mandalay after Outbreak of Communal Violence appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Private Sector Development of Domestic Airports Postponed

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 11:07 PM PDT

aviation industry Myanmar, airports Myanmar

The local airport in the Arakan State capital Sittwe. (Photo: Jpaing / The Irrawaddy)

RANGOON — The Department of Civil Aviation (DCA) said on Tuesday that it is indefinitely delaying its plans to invite foreign and local companies to upgrade 30 out Burma's 69 domestic airports.

"We're also busy with the three other international airport development projects, so I think domestic airport projects will be tendered after we finish all these [international airports]," the new DCA Director General Win Swe Tun told The Irrawaddy. He declined to specify when the domestic airport projects could be offered up for a tender.

The DCA has been working with private investors to develop Rangoon's new Hanthawaddy international airport and to upgrade the international airports of Mandalay and Naypyidaw. It could take several years before these projects are completed.

Win Swe Tun said a future tender is likely to invite investors to develop a smaller number of domestic airports than originally planned, adding, "It will be less than 30 airports because we checked the registry of interest last year."

In November, the DCA called on companies to register their interest and proposals for improving 30 of Burma's 69 domestic airports, in a process that served to inform the government agency of the plans of potential airport developers.

Win Swe Tun declined to reveal how many firms had registered an interest in taking over and developing the 30 domestic airports.

In April, the DCA still seemed confident that it could attract private investors and its then-Director General Tin Naing Tun said a tender for the 30 domestic airports would be issued by October.

The DCA wants to sign public-private partnership agreements in which it expects private investors to come with proposals and a budget to take over airport management and upgrade infrastructure and technology. The agency would continue to be responsible for airport security and air traffic control.

Win Swe Tun said, "Local or foreign companies will have to create market to attract airlines and passengers, and also they should have long term planning to handle income and expenses.

"Our aim is to reduce government budget for running these domestic airports while achieving better services, infrastructure and runways."

Currently, local airports are small, unsafe and lack sophisticated technology, following decades of mismanagement and neglect under the previous military government. According to the DCA, the government currently spends about US $12 million annually on running the 69 domestic airports.

The delay of the planned tender for domestic airports casts doubts over the government's plan to let the private sector foot much of the bill of the upgrade of local airports. Details of a policy or master plan for the development of Burma's crumbling airports have also been scarce.

Economists, such as Burma specialist Sean Turnell, have noted that apart from tourist destinations Bagan, Inle Lake, Mandalay and the Mergui Archipelago, domestic airports in the country will not be commercially attractive and therefore hard to develop through private sector investment.

"Too out of the way, no viable tourist traffic and no reservoir of middle-class travelers or business activity to sustain them," Turnell said of most domestic airport in a recent interview. "The sort of returns these airports could generate would not be sufficient for the relatively high capital outlays creating a modern airport would require."

It's not only domestic airports, however, that have struggled to secure private investment desired by DCA. Its approach to public-private partnership for the Hanthawaddy airport project has also run into problems.

The agency granted South Korea's Incheon the tender to build Hanthawaddy last year, but differences arose over who would finance the project. The government eventually agreed to guarantee development loans for half of the project cost—estimated at approximately US $1.5 billion.

Last year, Japan's Mitsubishi Corporation was awarded the tender to develop Mandalay airport. A subsidiary of Burmese conglomerate Asia World was awarded a $150 million contract to upgrade Rangoon's old Mingalardon airport.

The post Private Sector Development of Domestic Airports Postponed appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

London Accused of Hypocrisy While Preaching Burma Transparency

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 05:00 PM PDT

British business transparency

Britain's Prime Minister David Cameron greets Burma's President Thein Sein at Downing Street in central London on July 15, 2013. (Photo: Reuters)

The British government has been sharply criticized for hiding behind "commercial confidentiality" rules relating to Burma while calling for business transparency in the Southeast Asian nation.

The London Foreign and Commonwealth Office has refused all requests for information about British companies' activities in Burma, "using commercial interests and commercial confidentiality as an excuse," said the human rights NGO Burma Campaign UK.

"It is hypocritical of the British government to preach the need for transparency in doing business in Burma, even spending hundreds of thousands of pounds on so-called responsible initiatives, and then refuse to reveal information it has on what British companies are doing in the country," the organization's director Mark Farmaner told The Irrawaddy.

"The British government frequently hides behind commercial confidentiality as a reason for not disclosing information," he said.

But the curtain of confidentiality has been lifted slightly following legal action in London by the campaign against the British Ministry of Defence over its dealings with the Burmese military.

The campaign appealed under Britain's Freedom of Information Act after the Ministry of Defence refused to provide details of a course in defense management in which Burmese Army officers took part earlier this year.

However, it has taken months of pushing at the ministry's door to open it a little. Despite British legal rules requiring the ministry to reply to the campaign within one month, it took eight months to respond, Farmaner said.

"The Ministry of Defence cited commercial confidentiality because the course is run jointly with Cranfield University, and argued that releasing the materials could give competitor universities an advantage," Farmaner said.

"Burma Campaign UK argued that as the materials are being given to hundreds of students who can pass on the materials, this risk already exists and the public interest in releasing the information outweighs the commercial interests argument. These points were accepted in the judgment on our appeal," he told The Irrawaddy.

However, despite admitting it was flouting Britain's Freedom of Information law, the ministry has still not fully disclosed the information sought by the NGO.

"We are pleased that the Ministry of Defence has finally agreed that they should not keep details of the training they are giving to the Burmese Army a secret, but it is very frustrating that they still haven't released this information," Farmaner said.

"The Ministry of Defence appears to be deliberately using excuse after excuse to try to obstruct us from obtaining any kind of information about the training they are giving to the Burmese Army."

All the information requested by the NGO under the Britain's own transparency law should have been made public by May 28, Farmaner said. Instead, the NGO is still waiting. The British Foreign Office separately said it needed another month to assess the situation.

"[The Foreign Office] cite the impact on international relations as the reason. This means that they are concerned that releasing the information will upset the government of Burma," he said.

The Ministry of Defence began training programs for Burmese officers in January. Such engagement is opposed by some human rights groups, which argue that the Burmese Army continues to commit abuses against its own people.

"The training is taking place despite the Burmese Army still committing serious human rights abuses which violate international law," Burma Campaign UK has previously stated.

"Crimes committed by the Burmese Army since the reform process began include rape and gang rape of ethnic women, including children, deliberate targeting of civilians, arbitrary execution, arbitrary detention, torture, mutilations, looting, bombing civilian areas, blocking humanitarian assistance, destruction of property, and extortion.

"The British government claims that the training will help improve human rights and governance, but has been unable to explain how the training will achieve these goals."

The training program has also been criticized by Human Rights Watch, which alleged earlier this year that the present-day Burmese Army still has "an abusive modus operandi in its DNA."

Burma Campaign UK has suggested that the ultimate objective of the British government's embrace of the Burmese Army is commercial—with future weapons sales in mind. "Will the British government make a commitment that there will be no arms sales to Burma, even if the European Union arms embargo is lifted, until Burma is fully democratic, there is constitutional reform creating a federal system, genuine peace with ethnic groups, the Army has a clean human rights record, and the military is under full control of a democratic government?" the NGO asked.

The secrecy surrounding the military training of Burmese officers is happening while the British government presses the Naypyidaw government to be more open and transparent in its day-to-day business to show the outside world it has changed for the better, Farmaner said.

In its "UK Activities in Burma" report in April, the British government said it is spending US$600,000 "promoting transparent and equitable economic reform through projects on anti-money laundering, public private partnerships and strengthening the accountancy profession."

In addition, it is paying nearly $1.9 million to "support Burma's application to the Extractives Industries Transparency Initiative [EITI] which will help improve the transparency and accountability of the revenues from Burma's natural resources."

The post London Accused of Hypocrisy While Preaching Burma Transparency appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Book Review—Refugee Camp Governance with a Difference

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 05:29 PM PDT

Thailand-Burma border refugee camps

"Governing Refugees: Justice, Order and Legal Pluralism," by Kirsten McConnachie (Routledge, 2014).

According to its publishers, "Governing Refugees: Justice, Order and Legal Pluralism" is a book that "will appeal to anyone with relevant interests in law, anthropology, and criminology, as well as those working in the area of Refugee Studies."

That makes it sound as if it is mostly of academic interest, but in fact, it is much more than that. It should be a must-read for Burma watchers, for all who have been engaged in the 30-year saga of refugees on the Thai-Burmese border, and especially for those involved in refugee policymaking, including state agencies, the UN and donors.

It is presumably targeted at university libraries, but hopefully its ambiguous title, relatively high price and unhelpful back-cover academic jargon will not deter a wider audience. Kirsten McConnachie is a compelling and objective writer, and although there are forays into academia, her book is very readable and offers important insights, including many that challenge conventional wisdom.

"Governing Refugees" is an outstanding study of Karen refugee camps on the Thai-Burmese border and the unique humanitarian assistance model that enabled refugees not only to survive protracted encampment with dignity for 30 years, but also to maintain and strengthen community structures—structures that potentially have crucial roles to play in resolving conflict in Burma and in rehabilitating the war-torn ethnic border states.

McConnachie lived in the refugee camps, clearly winning the trust of the population and gaining deep understanding of their traditions, values and aspirations. She realized she was witnessing something very special that challenged the common perception of refugees as powerless victims and of refugee camps as dangerous places lacking normal social structures.

Noting that "Despite the limited opportunities available in the camp, daily life is structured and industrious" and that "refugee camps in Thailand have remained relatively stable and secure throughout tremendous political and demographic flux," McConnachie set out to study why.

In her perceptive research, she acknowledges that the self-governing refugee assistance and camp management model happened somewhat by accident. The most important factor was the Royal Thai Government's decision not to involve the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in the early years and instead to allow non-governmental organizations—principally The Border Consortium (TBC)—to adopt a pragmatic approach, which "in effect … allowed refugees to get on with the work of camp management largely without oversight."

Formal camp management support came only 20 years later and McConnachie observes, "It is certainly possible that the decades in which camps were permitted to develop their own structures largely without interference were central to the stability that they developed."

For many years, the model went unchallenged, and in fact was proclaimed as exemplary in many quarters for its efficiency. But by the time this research was carried out, UNHCR had been invited to provide a protection role on the border and the program was under increasing scrutiny to ensure that it met international standards.

A key concern was the perceived level of involvement of the Karen National Union (KNU)—the principal Karen non-state armed group resisting Burmese military assimilation of their homelands—in camp affairs. Some portrayed this as "naïve, even negligent, for enabling refugee militarization," helping to "consolidate the power of a KNU elite," and contributing "to prolonging the conflict."

When the refugee story began 30 years ago, there was little international understanding of or sympathy for the ethnic struggle in Burma. Even as awareness grew in the 1990s (as demonstrated by Annual UN Security Council Resolutions calling for tripartite negotiations between the junta, the National League for Democracy led by Aung San Suu Kyi, and the ethnic nationalities), the reality was that there was still little empathy for the non-state actors involved in the struggle for self-determination, and in whose areas of control most of the displaced people lived.

McConnachie explains that "ensuring 'the civilian character of refugee camps' is a global policy concern of UNHCR and these allegations of militarization in Thailand prompted donors to demand more transparency and oversight of camp management."

It was more serious than that. In 2007, some donors (fortunately not all) began to question the credibility of the self-governing model, contesting the idea that any refugee-support program could be based on trust. All aspects of the program were aggressively challenged and serious doubts were expressed about its accountability. The European Union, until then TBC's largest donor, began to reduce funding and, with falling Western exchange rates and increasing rice prices after the 2007/8 global financial and food crises, TBC was forced to start cutting basic refugee support.

McConnachie acknowledges the challenge of KNU influence and explores the mainly anecdotal evidence put forward to support it. She concludes that the KNU's "relationship with the wider refugee population is more complicated than one of simple domination" and that serious accusations "appear to be isolated and exceptional cases." She makes the crucial observation that the primary obstacle to UNHCR accepting a role for non-state actors "appears to be the potential for abuse of power, forced recruitment or military domination rather than its actual occurrence."

It was difficult for TBC to defend the accusations at the time because, indeed, the model was largely based on trust. Its response was, over the next few years, to improved databases, stock controls, monitoring procedures and governance practices based on international "best practice." These reforms enhanced the efficiency and accountability of the program and, most importantly, the increased scrutiny never uncovered any serious malpractice. This was a joint exercise with the refugee and camp committees and, from TBC's perspective, their understanding and industrious response once again vindicated the model and confirmed that trust had always been well placed.

"Governing Refugees" includes insightful information about the KNU and their relationship with the refugees and a fascinating and sensitive study of Karen moral standards and their traditional justice system. There are also illuminating insights into the way refugees view the international aid community, including their mandates and standards.

McConnachie sympathetically explores the conflicts that arose with the international community when attempting to harmonize camp rules with Thai law and offers a challenging personal "tentative counter-critique," one of the focuses of her work.

But, in responding to doubts and criticisms which threatened the sustainability of the aid programs, it is her de-demonization of the non-state actors and her eloquent research on the strengths of the unique self-governance model challenging conventional international practice that is most welcome.

As TBC understood all along, the refugees are not just powerless victims and the non-state actors do have positive roles to play. Ironically, it has been the willingness of the Burmese government's Minister Aung Min to negotiate ceasefires and open the way for political dialogue with the non-state armed groups that has at last confirmed their legitimacy as important parties in determining Burma's political future—something the international community has been reluctant to recognize.

McConnachie suggests that "Rather than rejecting the simple possibility that 'non-state actors' can also be legitimate governance actors, a more productive approach would be to openly acknowledge their role and use this as a baseline to negotiate terms and techniques of governance."

"Governing Refugees" shows that the refugee self-governance model on the Thai-Burmese border was successful. Yet it might never have happened had UNHCR been invited to lead the relief response at the outset, since its mandate is "entirely non-political" and its primary orientation is towards state governments.

The Thai-Burmese border experience therefore merits careful study for relevance elsewhere. In spite of its academic camouflage, McConnachie's book provides an excellent and balanced starting point for discussion and debate.

Jack Dunford was the executive director of the Thailand Burma Border Consortium (TBC) from 1984 to 2012.

The post Book Review—Refugee Camp Governance with a Difference appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Passions Run High as Hong Kong Marches for Democracy

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 10:58 PM PDT

Hong Kong democracy movement

A protester wearing a headband which reads "civil disobedience" cries before being dragged away from a street by the police after staying overnight at Hong Kong's financial Central district on July 2, 2014. (Photo: Reuters / Bobby Yip)

HONG KONG — Hundreds of thousands of pro-democracy protesters marched in Hong Kong on Tuesday, many calling for the city's leader to be sacked, in what could turn out to be the biggest challenge to Chinese Communist Party rule in more than a decade.

Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying said his government would do its "utmost" to move towards universal suffrage and stressed the need for stability after nearly 800,000 people voted for full democracy in an unofficial referendum last month.

Organizers put the number of protesters at more than 510,000, emphasizing this was a conservative estimate. Police said some 98,600 had joined the protest at its peak.

Johnson Yeung, convener of the Civil Human Rights Front, one of the organizers of the march, said activists would take to the streets to occupy the business district if China does not respond to demands for a direct election in 2017.

Scores of demonstrators dispersed late on Tuesday, but thousands remained after midnight. Some student groups, including Scholarism and the Hong Kong Federation of Students, prepared to hunker down for the night.

"The Hong Kong government is now controlled by the Chinese government," said Daniel Cheng, 24, a recent graduate who now works as a building surveyor. "My mom said not to be arrested, to be careful. I will try, but I think I should do what I can for Hong Kong, my colleagues, my classmates, my friends."

A security blanket was thrown across the heart of the business district, home to global banks like HSBC and Standard Chartered, as thousands of protesters lingered. Some 200 police stood guard outside the offices of Hong Kong's leader nearby.

Tempers flared in Hong Kong's heat, fierce humidity and heavy downpours as thousands found themselves trapped near the start of the march in the shopping hub of Causeway Bay even as the head of the march reached the Central business district.

Police dragged away several protesters as crowds pushed against barricades. Officers later criticized organizers of the usually peaceful annual procession, warning that legal action may follow after they ignored instructions to speed up.

Activists from the League of Social Democrats burned a copy of a "white paper" released by Beijing last month that reasserted its authority over the former British colony. The group also burned a portrait of Leung.

"This could be the last chance to make our voices heard," said Lam Sui-pan, a 22-year-old human rights volunteer, at the end of the march. A veteran of the last five processions, he said he had never seen such a big turnout.

Deep Divide

Tension is running high after the referendum. Roads were closed off around Victoria Park, where the rally started. Surrounded by police, demonstrators marched to Central, some shouting, "Overthrow the Chinese Communist Party." People were still leaving the park as the first protesters reached Central after four hours' marching.

Anson Chan, Hong Kong's former top civil servant and a key supporter of the unofficial referendum, said the vote was clear.

"They [voters] are not taken in by recent suggestions that we should pocket whatever we are offered in the hope that more would come later," she said. "This is just rubbish."

Organizers of the annual July 1 rally, marking the day the territory returned to China in 1997, were expecting the largest turnout since 2003, when half a million people demonstrated against proposed anti-subversion laws that were later scrapped.

Tung Chee-hwa, the city's leader at the time, stepped down in March 2005, nearly two years before completing his second five-year term.

"I think in view of the vote of almost 800,000 people in favor of democracy, real democracy, not the type of democracy Beijing is suggesting, that today is probably going to be one of the most pivotal moments in the history of the democratic movement in Hong Kong," said lawyer Sean Leonard, from the think tank HKU International Institute of Financial Law. "It's about time Beijing woke up."

The demonstrators are demanding greater democracy in elections for the city's leader, or chief executive, in 2017. They want nominations to be open to everyone. China's leaders want to ensure only pro-Beijing candidates are on the ballot.

Hong Kong returned to China with wide-ranging autonomy under the formula of "one country, two systems," allowing such protests to take place. But China bristles at open dissent, especially over sensitive matters such as demands for universal suffrage and the annual June 4 vigil in Hong Kong to mark the crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing in 1989.

Chinese Vice President Li Yuanchao urged a visiting Hong Kong youth group on Tuesday to make sure young people "staunchly uphold 'one country, two systems,'" China's Xinhua news agency reported.

Beijing’s Liaison Office in Hong Kong went further.

"We are firmly against the radical and illegal activities launched by very few people, because we all have responsibilities to defend the bottom line of law which Hong Kong people cherish," office head Zhang Xiaoming said in apparent reference to the referendum and planned protests.

"Central government firmly supports the universal suffrage in Hong Kong, and its sincerity and determination is unswerving. This kind of sincerity and determination won't have any change or shake because of the so-called referendum or the scale of the march."

Activists in neighboring Macau were likely to watch the Hong Kong rally closely. A bill there providing lavish perks for senior civil servants was withdrawn days after the largest protest since China resumed control over the former Portuguese colony in 1999.

An activist from self-ruled Taiwan, Chen Wei-ting, who was denied entry to Hong Kong to take part in the rally, sent a message via video link.

"There is no way we can get to Hong Kong to stand with you on the scene, but our hearts are with yours tonight. I believe the democratic movements of Taiwan and Hong Kong will blossom in the foreseeable future," Chen said.

Trying Its Best

Speaking at a flag-raising ceremony to mark the 17th anniversary of Hong Kong's return to China, Chief Executive Leung said the government was trying its best.

"The [special administrative region] government and I will do our utmost to forge a consensus in the community and work together towards the goal of implementing universal suffrage for the chief executive election on schedule and in accordance with the law," Leung said at Golden Bauhinia Square, where ceremonies for the handover of Hong Kong were held in 1997.

Many Hong Kong people are concerned that Beijing is playing an increasing role in the city's civil and political life since the handover.

Occupy Central with Love and Peace, the group behind the unofficial poll, has threatened to lock down Central, home to some of Asia’s biggest companies, as part of its campaign.

It has ruled out taking action to blockade Central on Tuesday, saying it "wouldn’t be the right moment."

Additional reporting by Grace Li, Twinnie Siu, Emily Chung, Nikki Sun, Eiffy Luo, Adam Rose and Clare Jim in Hong Kong and Ben Blanchard in Beijing

The post Passions Run High as Hong Kong Marches for Democracy appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Cambodia Frees Thai Who Claimed Border Territory

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 10:49 PM PDT

Acting Thai Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow, left, shakes hands with his Cambodian counterpart, Hor Namhong, during a meeting in Phnom Penh on July 1, 2014. (Photo: Reuters / Samrang Pring)

PHNOM PENH — Cambodia agreed on Tuesday to free a Thai nationalist it imprisoned for more than three years for illegally crossing its border to claim territory for Thailand, possibly heralding a warming of relations between the neighbors.

The pardon for Veera Somkwamkid was announced after a meeting between Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen and acting Thai Foreign Minister Sihasak Phuangketkeow.

Relations between the two countries have been sour for years. The surprise move followed an exodus from Thailand of about 250,000 Cambodian workers who fled after Thailand's new military government announced a crackdown on migrants working illegally. Most of the estimated 400,000 Cambodian workers who had been in Thailand had no permits. The main purpose of Sihasak's visit was to discuss an organized, legal return of the workers.

Veera was arrested with six Thai colleagues at the end of 2010 after crossing the border to publicize claims that frontier areas held by Cambodia actually belonged to Thailand.

Five were given suspended sentences and released, but Veera, the leader, was sentenced to eight years in prison after being found guilty of espionage, illegal entry and trespassing in a military zone. His assistant, who was sentenced to six years, was released in February last year under a mass pardon.

Veera's Thailand Patriot Network was closely associated with Thailand's royalist People’s Alliance for Democracy—better known as the Yellow Shirt movement—and his incursion was widely seen as an effort to whip up a wave of nationalism to support its political agenda. Yellow Shirt protests helped lead to a coup that ousted Thai Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra in 2006, and added pressure that forced two of his political allies from office in 2008.

Protests beginning late last year by a group sharing the Yellow Shirts' agenda helped force Thaksin's sister, Yingluck Shinawatra, from the premiership last month and led to another military coup on May 22. The military's leadership shares many of the political views of the Yellow Shirts and their allies, including a desire to reduce the power of the Shinawatras' political machine.

Veera's case had its origins in a dispute between Cambodia and Thailand over land near an ancient temple on their border.

Sihasak told reporters that he had relayed a request for Veera's release from Thai army commander Gen. Prayuth Chan-ocha, who led the May 22 coup.

Hun Sen had anticipated the request and produced a pardon signed by King Norodom Sihamoni, Sihasak said.

The post Cambodia Frees Thai Who Claimed Border Territory appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.

Top Philippine Court Deals Blow to President, Throws out Fund

Posted: 01 Jul 2014 10:24 PM PDT

corruption in the Philippines

Philippine President Benigno Aquino III at work. (Photo: Office of the President of the Philippines)

MANILA — The Philippine Supreme Court threw out as unconstitutional a fund overseen by President Benigno Aquino to stimulate the economy, dealing a setback to his bid to portray himself as a champion of the fight against corruption.

In 2011, Aquino introduced his Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), devised as a means to boost government spending. His critics derided it as a tool to control Congress by buying the loyalty of its members.

Three senators are on trial on charges of misusing a separate congressional fund to channel money back to themselves. Aquino abolished that so-called "pork barrel" fund last year, portraying his action as a key blow in the drive to root out graft.

Theodore Te, a spokesman for the Supreme Court, said certain "acts and practices" under the president's DAP were illegal and unconstitutional. The vote among 13 justices was unanimous.

Te said the government had violated the constitution by allowing practices like cross-border transfers of government savings to increase funds available to other offices. It was also illegal, the court said, for the government to fund projects "not covered by any general appropriation act."

A presidential spokeswoman said the administration would not comment until it had examined the ruling.

Nearly 158 billion pesos (US$3.62 billion) from 2011 to 2013 were disbursed under the president's fund.

Aquino came to power in 2010 on a platform of good governance and ridding the country of its image as one of the most corrupt in Asia. During his mandate, politicians, civil servants and top officers have been charged and jailed on corruption charges.

The opposition said Tuesday's ruling exposed attempts by the president to circumvent the law to favor his allies.

The three opposition senators facing plunder cases before an anti-corruption court for misuse of the now disbanded "pork barrel" fund say there was little difference in the way the two funds operated. Aquino's program, they said, was little more than a smokescreen to crack down on opponents.

Miriam Defensor Santiago, an independent senator, said: "Both the pork barrel and DAP scandals are equally repulsive."

Minority congressman Neri Colmenares said the DAP "exposes the hypocrisy of the Aquino administration's hollow, selective and even deceptive anti-corruption campaign."

The program, he said, "has drained billions of pesos from public funds to highly questionable projects."

Analysts said the Supreme Court had, in effect, upheld the principle of separation of powers.

"It’s just a slap in the wrist," said Earl Parreno of the Institute of Electoral and Political Reforms. "The Supreme Court was just telling the president don't ever do it again."

Government lawyers argued in court that the administration had stopped the practice of pooling government savings into a fund and disbursing it to lawmakers after the practice was questioned in the court last year.

Additional reporting by Lara Murallos

The post Top Philippine Court Deals Blow to President, Throws out Fund appeared first on The Irrawaddy Magazine.