Tuesday, January 12, 2016

Shan Herald Agency for News

Shan Herald Agency for News

NCA non-signatory groups permitted to speak at Peace Conference

Posted: 11 Jan 2016 10:36 PM PST

Non-signatories of the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA), who have been designated as 'special invitees,' will be permitted to speak their piece at the first Union Peace Conference (UPC) which starts today, according to sources from Naypyidaw.  


"They can present their case with regards to each thematic issues chosen by the UPC organizers," said a Shan representative.

So far, only representatives from the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (NSCN) are attending as special invitees. Others have boycotted it.

"The decision to allow the non-signatories to speak should have been made known earlier," criticized a senior Shan politician. "Now it is too late to change their minds," he said of the non-signatory groups.

The issues selected by the Union Peace Dialogue Joint Committee (UPDJC), a 48-member setup made up of 16 members from three key stakeholders blocs—government-parliament-military, ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) and political parties—are:

·         Politics                                     Basic principles for a federal democracy
·         Social                                       Resettlement and reconstruction for IDPs
·         Economy                                 Tax and revenue sharing
·         Security                                   Basic principles for Union security and defense
·         Land and natural resources    Management and distribution 

The five-day gathering will end on 16 January after reading out reports and conclusions ("not decisions," according to another Shan participant) from each thematic group.
Concerns have been raised by critics, many of whom had experienced decisions pre-determined by the then ruling military junta at the 14-year-long National Convention (NC), better known as Nyaung Hnabin (Two Banyan Trees) Convention, held to draw up the basic principles for what became the 2008 constitution.

"We don't want more Nyaung Hnabins," said Sai Nyunt Lwin, General Secretary of the Shan Nationalities League for Democracy (SNLD).

His party will be represented by younger members at the UPC, he added.

The first UPC is expected to be followed by state/regional level political dialogues, where proposals for each five key topics will be further developed.

A total of 1,136 participants and observers including representatives from foreign embassies, UN agencies, INGOs, government recognized organizations and CSOs have been invited.

By SAI KHUENSAI / Shan Herald Agency for News (S.H.A.N)

The Peace Process: If the half-empty glass is full, will you come?

Posted: 11 Jan 2016 10:22 PM PST

I do not agree with what you say.
But I will defend to the death your right to say it.
(Voltaire)

People usually don't see things the same way. Readers don't need me to tell them that.

Sometime in 1996-97, I was watching a documentary on Tibet produced by two top Thai TV journalists, Thepchai Yong and Sutthichai Yun.

What struck me was their conclusion:

·         The majority those in exile, away from their homeland, stood for a radical solution: Independence from China
·         On the other hand, the two were able to talk to many of those in Chinese-controlled Tibet who believed there was a win-win solution, one that allowed both the Chinese and Tibetans to live together in peace

Then, a few years earlier, another military confrontation between Thailand and Cambodia over the sacred Prasat Phra Viharn, better known as Preah Vihear Temple, was looming again.

Most of the agitators for war came from out of harm's way: the Cambodian capital of Phnom Penh and the Thai capital of Bangkok. Both were exhorting their respective countrymen to fight to the death for what was rightfully theirs.

However, people in the Preah Vihear Temple area on both sides of the border, upon inquiry, gave different opinions. If shooting started, it would be they who would be bearing the brunt of it, and understandably, they wanted none of it. What they wanted, they said, was a peaceful solution. Fortunately, those for peace won the day.

Lately, I found out that Burma is no different from Tibet, Cambodia or Thailand. We have our own hardliners and 'softliners,' the former mostly living outside of the killing fields and especially the IDP camps. "It is those who are not being driven away from their homes and live from hand to mouth daily in an IDP camp that can afford to be tough," I was recently told by a lady I have known for more than 20 years. "But ask those who are in the camps, for whom the situation is such that they are given not food nor clothing, but only money to buy them from where, they don't know. And they'll tell you that they want their leaders to sign the NCA (Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement)."

This is of course the classic case of half-full/half-empty glass of water:
·         Those who have refused to sign it say, "We won't come to the talks unless it is filled to the brim by the government"
·         While those who have signed it say, "Let's go and try to fill it to the full by ourselves"

Right now, there's no way of knowing who's going to be right and who's going to be wrong. Because, in war and peace, as well as in life, there's no such thing as certain.

The question, or questions, now are:

·         If the glass is successfully filled (or almost) to the full by the signatories, will the non-signatories follow suit?
·         On the other hand, if the signatories fail to fill the glass (or if the glass is broken) and they decide to return to armed struggle again, will both be friends again?

By SAI KHUENSAI / Director of Pyidaungsu Institute and Founder of Shan Herald Agency for News (S.H.A.N)


All views expressed are the author's own. 
Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)