Showing posts with label The Irrawaddy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Irrawaddy. Show all posts

Monday, June 3, 2013

12 Burmese Migrant Workers Drown En Route to Thailand

Posted: 03 Jun 2013 05:00 AM PDT

Burmese migrant workers cross the Three Pagodas Pass on the Thai-Burmese border. (Photo: Lawi Weng / The Irrawaddy)
At least 12 Burmese migrant workers drowned off Thailand's southwestern coast this weekend when boats smuggling them from Kawthaung, Burma's southernmost town in Tenasserim Division, to Ranong Province, Thailand, sank.
The bodies of nine Burmese nationals — six men and three women — were found floating near Koh Chang and Koh Phayam, two islands of the coast of Ranong Province, on Sunday, Thai newspaper The Bangkok Post reported. Three more bodies were reportedly found floating in the area on Saturday.
Niran Chuayjit, an inspector of Thailand's Marine Police Division 8, told the newspaper that 38 Burmese nationals were rescued by Thai authorities on Saturday, adding that they arebeing detained in Ranong town for illegal entry. Those who died at sea are believed to be illegal migrants as they lacked proper travel documents, Thai officials said.
Sources in Burma told The Irrawaddy that four boats smuggling dozens of migrant workers had attempted to cross the estuary of Kra Buri, a tidal riverthat separates Burma's Kauwthang Township and Thailand's Ranong Province, on Friday night.
Two vessels made a safe landing on the Thai coast, but another was discovered by Thai border guard forces, according to a local man with close connections to the Kawthaung Police. The vessel sailed away in the night and it is unclear what happened to it, he said, adding that the boat might have sunk due stormy weather.
"Thai security gave a signal to the boat to stop [for inspection]. But, it didn’t stop and tried to sail away. And the weather was very bad," said the source, who declined to be named.
Earlier on Friday night, a fourth boat carrying 41 Burmese migrants sank while making the crossing, but Thai authorities spotted the migrants holding on to parts of the vessel and rescued 38, according to the local source. Three who were on board are believed to have drowned.
Burmese police in Kawthaung confirmed that a group of migrant workers had drowned over the weekend, but officers declined to discuss details of the accidents. "Many migrants are still using the old tactic of crossing the Thai-Burma border illegally by boats, with the help of smugglers," said an officer.
He added thata Burmese anti-human trafficking team in Kawthaung, led by police officer Lon Ling, was investigating the case and questioning a detained man who had steered one of the boats smuggling the workers.
Kawthaung is one of the main border crossing points used by Burmese migrant workers to enter neighboring Thailand in search of work. Local residents have said that perhaps as many as 500 workers cross into Ranong Province illegally every day.
Despite recent anti-human trafficking campaigns in Burma, hundreds of thousands of migrant workers continue to enter Thailand — often with the help of people's smugglers — in search of a better livelihood.
The illegal entry is fraught with danger, and accidents or incidents involving Thai border guard forces are common. In April 2008, 54 Burmese migrant workers suffocated to death in a container truck, while they were being smuggled from Ranong to the Thai resort island of Phuket.
The governments of Thailand and Burma have been trying for several years to jointly come up with a way of regulating the illicit flow of migrant labor and providing official identity papers to the more than 2 million Burmese workers in Thailand.
These attempts have produced few results however, and most Burmese workers say that they are still forced to rely on underground channels and bribe-paying to gain entry and employment in Thailand.
Posted: 03 Jun 2013 04:39 AM PDT
Security forces and local officials stand behind a sign that warned protesters in April that they would be shot if they proceeded beyond that point. (Photo: Han Win Aung)


Security forces and local officials stand behind a sign that warned protesters in April that they would be shot if they proceeded beyond that point. (Photo: Han Win Aung)

Activists protesting against the Letpadaung copper mine in Sagaing Division have condemned the sentencing of three detained demonstrators, accusing the judiciary of a lack of transparency and failing to provide the defendants with due process of law.
Sagaing locals and colleagues of the detained said the three men were sentenced without having a chance to hire a lawyer. Their family members were not informed of the trial, they also claimed.
"This is simply an abuse of human rights. They've been missing for about a month since they were arrested. The authorities failed to inform the family members," said Min Min, a local.
Aung Soe, from Rangoon People's Support Network, and the two farmers were detained after security forces moved in to stop farmers from plowing their confiscated fields in the villages of Hse Te and Moegyopyin on April 25.
"They even refuse to provide information concerning the detainees when the families went to inquire about where they were and what kind of trial they were facing. The authorities treated us poorly when we went to ask about the detainees as well."
The district court of Shwebo on Saturday sentenced Aung Soe, who helped the protesting farmers, to 18 months in prison, while two other farmers from Hse Te who plowed on their confiscated lands were each penalized with six months in prison for gathering illegally.
"We were never informed that they were moved to Shwebo prison either. I think the authorities, somehow, are afraid of unrest, for we are continuously protesting for the release of these people and an end to mining in the area," he said. "However, we believe this action by the authorities shows there's still no transparency and there's no justice in the judicial system."
Protests have been staged periodically since early 2012, with farmers and other locals looking to win back their confiscated lands and halt mining in the area.
More than 7,000 acres of land from 26 villages were confiscated and many families were displaced due to the copper mining project, which is a joint venture between the Chinese-owned company Wanbao and Burma's military-owned Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd (UMEHL). The mining project was launched in 2010.
Posted: 03 Jun 2013 02:56 AM PDT

Aung San Suu Kyi, center, receives the National Endowment for Democracy award from Carl Gershman and Madeleine Albright during a ceremony in Washington on Sept. 20, 2012.
Former US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who is in Burma for the first time since 1995, told the leaders of Burma's political parties that the National Democratic Institute (NDI) is willing to assist the country in its ongoing transition to democracy.
Albright is on a five-day visit to Burma, arriving on Friday and meeting with Burmese political parties, ethnic leaders and civil society organizations on Sunday.
"She said she recognized the process of change in Burma and that she and the NDI are planning to help the country to continue this process," said Thu Wai, chairman of the Democratic Party.
"She said the NDI is currently helping Parliament by sending the parliamentarians abroad to learn about the politics and legislatures of foreign nations," he added. "She said NDI is willing to help civil society groups as well as every political party in order to foster effective participation in the reform process. She also said that she personally is willing to assist the country's education sector."
At the meeting, Albright asked party leaders about Burma's political environment and inquired as to the state of the country's civil society organizations. She also heard comments on the ongoing reform process more broadly.
"Albright asked us about the situation of the ethnic groups and the peace process with the government. We've explained to her that we will encourage the peace process and will go step by step to maintain the peace and stability of the country," said Khun Htun Oo, chairman of the Shan National League for Democracy.
"Since the visit of President Obama, the relationship between the US and Burma has already recovered, followed by the lifting of sanctions. Albright's visit will strengthen these relations, hopefully," he added.
Albright, who is currently the chairman of the NDI, is scheduled to meet with Burmese government officials and the country's pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi, according to a statement released by the NDI.
"Secretary Albright said she will stress the importance of democracy and development hand in hand with the rule of law and the fundamental principles of tolerance, compromise and inclusiveness," the statement said.
Albright will also deliver remarks at Rangoon University in Burma's commercial capital on Tuesday.
On her last visit, Albright delivered tough talk to Burma's generals, warning that the country would face continued isolation if the leaders of the military junta at the time did not take steps toward greater political freedom and democracy for Burma's people. She met in 1995 with military intelligence leader Lt-Gen Khin Nyunt and other government officials, as well as Suu Kyi.
Posted: 03 Jun 2013 12:57 AM PDT

Bee Ya Nyein Pyit Naing sits outside the Buddhist monastery in Lashio, Shan State, where Muslims displaced by recent violence are sheltering. (Photo: Steve Tickner / The Irrawaddy)
After his father was killed by rioters in Lashio, Bee Ya Nyein Pyit Naing came to stay at the Buddhist monastery that had been opened up to those displaced by the anti-Muslim violence in the Shan State town.
It was there that Bee Ya, who is 18 years old, told The Irrawaddy his story; of how his parents tried to flee the violence last week, but were thwarted when their car came upon one of the angry mobs.
"There were about 30 people," Bee Ya said. "They blocked the car on the road. Then, they smashed the glass windows of the car while my parents were inside. My father was killed in the car while my mother escaped."
It was 1 pm on Wednesday, one day after a mosque, an Islamic orphanage and several shops in Lashio were burned to the ground.
"I was very close to my father when they blocked his car. I was driving my motorbike behind my father's car. Many of them [the rioters] attempted to slash me with their knives and I tried to avoid them and escaped from the incident. I could not do anything to help my father," he said.
Bee Ya is the youngest in a family that includes one older brother and two older sisters. He said his family ran a business selling cars and lived in Quarter Seven, which saw the worst of the violence. While their house remained untouched when they fled to the monastery, he said it was not clear if it would still be standing when the family returned.
"I did not know what had happened to my parents until the evening as I was afraid and hid. I came back to the place where my father was attacked to look at the situation. I found cloth from my father at the place.
"I asked some people near the neighborhood about my parents and they told me my father was killed on the spot and my mother was being treated at the hospital," he added.
He said it was only when he attended his funeral that he learned his father had been beaten to death.
"I visited my mom at the hospital with help from the Red Cross this morning [Friday]," Bee Ya said. Red Cross members hid him in a car and transported him to the hospital to see his mother.
Bee Ya described the relief he felt when he arrived at the hospital to find his mother with only minor wounds: a black eye, and some scrapes and bruises on her chin and head.
"My mind has a little calm now after I visited my mother, but I am sad for my father," he said.
"It is very sad to be without my father. I do not know and worry a lot about what will happen to my family without my father. All our family used to stay together and used to be a happy family. I have become a son without a father now."
Posted: 03 Jun 2013 12:48 AM PDT

An advertisement is seen for Myanmar Beer, which is partly controlled by the military-owned Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings. Another major Burmese beer maker, Mandalay Beer, is at the center of a long legal battle between its former joint owner and Burma's government, after the military junta nationalized the company in 1997.
The former owner of the Mandalay Beer brewery says she will ask Burma's government to compensate her for damages incurred more than a decade ago after the former military junta confiscated the company, in a long legal battle that has put the country's beer industry on the map of an international court.
Win Win Nu—who owned Mandalay Beer in a joint venture between Burma's Ministry of Industry (1) and her Singapore-based company, Yaung Chi Oo Trading—earned rights to produce the beer in a five-year contract starting in 1993.
In 1997, the brewery was confiscated by the military, reportedly after a fallout between Win Win Nu's company and Aung Thaung, then the minister of information. Win Win Nu left the country and was forced to withdraw from the investment.
The case was heard not only in Burma's domestic courts, but also in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in The Hague, where Win Win Nu accused Burma's junta of forcibly nationalizing the company. The junta claimed Win Win Nu had misappropriated funds and later sued her in a court in Rangoon for allegedly scaring away other foreign investors.
Win Win Nu lost the ICJ case, but now under Burma's nominally civilian government she has decided to try her luck again.
"I was unlikely to get compensation if I asked the former military regime," Win Win Nu told The Irrawaddy recently. "Having presented the case to the International Court of Justice, I have strong evidence: I neither committed embezzlement nor had personal problems with U Aung Thaung."
Singapore-based Yaung Chi Oo suffered losses of US $7 million when the venture was compensated, she said. "And the factory still hasn't been transferred to a government department," she added.
During Win Win Nu's joint ownership, Mandalay Beer competed for market share with popular international brands including Heineken, Carlsberg, Singha and Foster's, as well as Chinese beers which entered Burma on the black market.
Many international brands including Heineken later left the Burmese market, facing pressure to stop conducting business in a country ruled by a junta with grave rights violations. Many are now forming joint ventures to reinter the market under the new government.
Win Win Nu was believed to have close ties to members of the former junta, including Khin Nyunt, who was then the head of the military intelligence unit.
Aung Thaung, the former minister, told The Irrawaddy that the Mandalay Beer contract was terminated because Yaung Chi Oo did not fulfill its obligation to invest $6 million within five years. He said the Singapore-based company invested just $1 million and did not cooperate with the factory's director on business matters.
"She [Win Win Nu] tried to show that she was familiar with authorities of higher rank, half the members of the cabinet and the military intelligence. I don't know what she intended, but it was intimidating for me," Aung Thaung, now a parliamentarian, said of their relationship during the joint venture.
"As Win Win Nu prosecuted the ministry at the International Court of Justice, we also did the same to her in domestic court for telling lies," he added. "But she didn't come to trial. So we regard her as an outlaw."
Aung Thaung said that the military's decision to nationalize Mandalay Beer was legal and that he believed Win Win Nu should provide compensation to the government.
Critics have said the junta's takeover of the brewery without prior negotiation made a stain on the country's investment record, raising concern for foreign investors.
The beer factory, built in 1859 and originally used to produce artillery, was turned into a brewery under the British in 1886. Japan operated the factory during World War II. The brewery is currently owned by the military-owned Union of Myanmar Economic Holdings Ltd.
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:18 PM PDT
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:17 PM PDT
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:17 PM PDT
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:17 PM PDT
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:16 PM PDT
Britain's top military chief, Gen Sir David Richards, is making a two-day visit to Burma, according to a report by the UK's Sky News network. Richards will meet with Burmese military leaders as well as President Thein Sein and opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, the report said. The visit was described as "significant" because Richards is the highest-ranking military official to visit Burma since 1962, when the Burmese military seized power in a bloody coup. Richards is expected to congratulate the current government on its reforms over the past two years. He will also report on his assessment of the situation in Burma human rights abuses continue unabated, when he returns to the UK.
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:15 PM PDT
Twelve bodies believed to belong to Burmese migrants have been found floating off the coast of Thailand's Ranong Province, the Bangkok Post reports. The bodies of three women were discovered on Saturday, and nine others were found the next day, according to the newspaper. Pol Lt-Col Niran said that all 12 may have been traveling together by boat when they were hit by a severe storm. Thai police said are contacting their Burmese counterparts to beef up measures to prevent people travelling to Thailand illegally on boats.
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:15 PM PDT
Despite growing interest in Burma among foreign investors, the country has yet to attract a substantial influx of money from overseas. According to a report by the Wall Street Journal, foreign direct investment in Burma came to just US $1.4 billion in the fiscal year that ended in March—the same amount that Laos received last year, despite having a population 10 times smaller. The trickle was blamed in part on the lingering effect of decades of sanctions, but lack of infrastructure, power shortages, high land costs, scarcity of skilled workers, cronyism and corruption, unclear regulation and insufficient official capacity are also hurdles, the report said.
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:14 PM PDT
The Rakhine Nationalities Development Party (RNDP), which won 34 seats in Burma's Parliament in 2010, has set out a plan to merge with the Arakan League for Democracy, according to a report by the Narinjara news agency. In a statement issued on May 29, the RNDP said the move was the first part of its six-point plan, which also includes abolishing the rights of non-citizens who hold temporary National ID cards to establish political parties and vote in elections. Dr Aye Maung, president of RNDP, said the party had "formed a combining committee to merge with ALD party in order to achieve our goal of national unity," which he said was the party's "first priority."
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:14 PM PDT
China has increased its nuclear weapons by about 10 warheads in the past year, and other nuclear states appear set on maintaining their arsenals, a Swedish think tank said on Monday. At the start of the year, China had raised its number of nuclear warheads to 250 from 240 in 2012 as part of a process to modernize its defense, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute said. However, it also said China is "highly non-transparent" when it comes to its nuclear arsenal. Bitter rivals Pakistan and India also increased their arsenals by around 10 warheads each. Meanwhile, the US and Russia continued their disarmament in accordance with the new START treaty that they signed in 2010.—AP
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 10:41 PM PDT


Zaw Zaw, center right, stands next to Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi at a children's hospital in Rangoon's Yankin Township. (Photo: Max Myanmar Facebook page)
RANGOON — Zaw Zaw, one of Burma’s most successful and notorious businessmen, likes to pick his way at odd hours around the hulking skeleton of his new hotel, rising beside Rangoon’s main airport road.
The 366-room Novotel holds a story of how one man, who remembers being too poor to afford a soccer ball, built an empire by befriending the military government in what was one of the most oppressive and isolated countries on earth; and how, as Burma opens up, he is quickly breaking with the past to embrace a prosperous, cosmopolitan future in which one thing seems certain: He will not lose.
"I am friends with everybody," Zaw Zaw says, a big smile spreading across his youthful face.
The 45-year-old tycoon, who built his fortune capitalizing on Burma’s old networks of patronage and power, has demonstrated an agility in reconfiguring his business — and image — to suit a new global audience, and at a speed few have matched.
As the country emerges from a half century of military rule, his Max Burma Group is on track to more than double revenues, according to data he has not made public before.
His ability to ride the waves of change suggests that the old economic order may not be overturned as Burma opens its markets and deepens its embrace of democracy.
Just as the former military leaders have taken off their uniforms to refashion themselves as civilian lawmakers and bureaucrats, many of Burma’s dozen or so economic giants are rebranding themselves as entrepreneurs and working hard to take the stink out of the word “crony.”
Zaw Zaw, widely regarded as among the cleanest of the bunch, has moved faster — and more publicly — than his peers to take advantage of Burma’s reintegration with the global economy.
Though he remains on a US blacklist that bans American companies from doing business with friends of the old regime, the Max Burma Group is one of the nation’s most successful conglomerates, employing 11,000 people in sectors from hotels and banking to cement and construction.
France’s Accor Group has a deal with him to manage the Novotel in Rangoon and an MGallery hotel in Naypyitaw, the capital. Zaw Zaw says he is pursuing a joint venture with a Thai cement company, and trying to get his Ayeyarwady Bank in shape so he can bring in a foreign partner. He also made a bold effort to list his energy subsidiary on the Singapore Stock Exchange, though that was rejected in April over lingering concerns about his past.
Zaw Zaw acknowledges being friendly with the old military regime, arguing that there was no other way to succeed. "Only the government has projects," he says. "If I don’t do projects with them, who will I do projects with?"
His only crime as he sees it? "In this poor country, I have become rich."
Zaw Zaw was not born to power. The youngest of six children, he grew up in a two-room wooden house in Yeygi township in Burma’s southern delta. His father was a government servant, and his mother sold food and household sundries from their home.
In 1988, during his final year at the University of Rangoon, he was swept up in student protests against the military government that galvanized the nation. When the government began rounding up student leaders, he hid in the countryside for four months, then went to Singapore with the help of a cousin who found him a job as a sailor. He had US $80 in his pocket. It was the beginning of a six-year odyssey abroad.
While Burma’s xenophobic government sank deeper into isolation, Zaw Zaw saw the world, earning $200 a month as a deckhand. He went to Australia, Hong Kong, Iran, Taiwan, Japan and Africa. He learned English. He saw the development in other countries and grew ashamed of the poverty and repression of his own.
He saved $8,000 and headed to Bangkok, where he blew most of it at nightclubs with friends. In 1991, he bought a ticket to Japan with his last $650.
In Tokyo, he worked three jobs, as a cook, a dishwasher and a waiter. He learned Japanese. Determined to go into business, he began flipping through the yellow pages and cold-calling used car dealers. One was named Max Trading Co. Zaw Zaw became friendly with the owner, bought two Nissan sedans and sold them to his friends.
Thus was born the Max Burma Group. Zaw Zaw exported used cars to Burma and other developing countries. Taking advantage of a Burmese law that allowed each citizen living overseas to import one car, he snapped up other people’s import permits on the black market for around $500 each.
He also met his future wife, a woman from Burma then working in Japan too. "She was buying the car from me," he says. "At the end, she bought me."
The couple moved back to Burma in 1995 to marry. Zaw Zaw kept importing cars, then added more profitable sales of heavy construction equipment. From there, he went into construction, first as a subcontractor and then winning government contracts himself.
His businesses thrived on connections he developed with the military rulers. He founded a construction company in 2005 that laid the roads for Naypyitaw. Five months later, he started a hotel company that built hotels in the same city in exchange for coveted vehicle import licenses. He developed a jade mine in 2007 in a joint venture with the government.
In 2010, the ruling junta oversaw a rush of privatizations before handing power to a nominally civilian government. MaxBurma acquired 12 gas stations, part of the land for the coming Novotel hotel and a banking license, putting Zaw Zaw in good position to capitalize on the ensuing opening of Burma’s economy.
Today, the Max Burma headquarters in downtown Rangoon are outfitted with sleek burnished wood. Zaw Zaw welcomes visitors in royal red chairs rimmed with ornate silver. He is surrounded by a coterie of assistants, young men with firm handshakes, bright smiles and perfect English, some of whom left successful careers abroad to join Zaw Zaw.
He says he wants to become a global, or at least regional, player. "In Burma, we don’t have any single brand to compete in the world, or even the region," he says. That quest is forcing him to break many of the old rules. He has courted the political opposition and Western diplomats, both of which were anathema to the former military government. And in a system that long prized secrecy, he agreed to open his books, first to 48 inspectors from the Singapore Stock Exchange, and then to The Associated Press.
The revenues of the privately-held Max Burma Group, as reported to Burma’s tax authorities, show the direction Zaw Zaw is steering his empire, as well as the extent to which he has benefited from his friends in the former military government.
Revenues grew to $240 million in the year ended March 31, 2012, the latest full-year data available, up from $180 million a year earlier. They then jumped to an estimated $293 million in the six months through Sept. 30, thanks to a surge in construction income.
The banking license Zaw Zaw got three years ago has given rise to the fastest growing part of Zaw Zaw’s empire.
He and three other tycoons were summoned to a meeting with the government in June 2010 and given the licenses, he says. "Maybe they trust me," says Zaw Zaw, who had no prior experience in the field. "I really don’t know why they gave me the license."
Revenues at Ayeyarwady Bank grew to $20.2 million in the year ended March 31, up from $7.5 million the prior year, while net income surged from about $825,000 to $7 million.
The Max Burma Group’s business is shifting away from areas traditionally associated with cronyism. Revenues from his jade mine, which is nearing the end of its productive life, plunged to $1 million in the first half of this fiscal year, after totaling $17 million the prior year. His construction business still accounts for more than 90 percent of group revenue, but it is weaning itself from government projects in favor of private ones such as the Novotel. And he stopped importing cars in 2010.
Zaw Zaw says he has long admired opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi and began cultivating a relationship with her after her release from house arrest in November 2010. Her rapprochement with him and other crony businessmen has dismayed some of her allies.
"My objection is up till now what they are practicing is not good business, but making monopolies," says Win Tin, a journalist who spent 19 years as a political prisoner and helped found the National League for Democracy, the party led by Suu Kyi. "We can’t forgive them."
But he commends Zaw Zaw for handing back some disputed land for public use and for his high-profile charity projects — which totaled $2.3 million from 1993 through 2012, according to a glossy 75-page company brochure. "As far as I know, Zaw Zaw is the best one," he says of the cronies.
Despite his outreach and pro-reform rhetoric, Zaw Zaw remains on the US sanctions list, which makes it harder for him to access foreign capital. The US Embassy, in a June 2009 cable released by WikiLeaks, described him as "one of several mid-level cronies actively attempting to curry favor with the regime."
The sanctions list does not allow for redemption. It is designed to hold people accountable for past wrongs, regardless of whatever good work they may be doing now, a US State Department official said on condition of anonymity, because he was not authorized to speak to the media.
The Singapore Stock Exchange’s top concern in rejecting Zaw Zaw’s bid to list Max Energy — which now operates 31 gas stations — was his presence on the US sanctions list and the "lack of clarity" as to why he was placed there, according to a filing by the Singapore-based company that would have been his partner. The exchange also flagged unresolved allegations of human rights violations and tax evasion.
Zaw Zaw insists he has done nothing wrong and was placed on the US blacklist based, in part, on inaccurate information. “If somebody did wrong, they should be punished,” he says. “But don’t create rumors.”
The Accor Group, for one, is happy to do business with him. Patrick Basset, a senior vice president for the region, said in an email that the hotel group sees its partnership with Zaw Zaw partly as a way "to encourage positive changes."
And, as the glowing financial results in his books suggest, the US sanctions may be hurting Zaw Zaw’s pride more than his pocketbook.
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 11:06 PM PDT

In this photo taken on July 21, 2011, Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung gestures at the opening session of the new legislature in Hanoi, Vietnam. (Photo: AP)
SINGAPORE — Vietnam’s prime minister called for unity among Southeast Asian countries as China asserts its claims to the energy-rich South China Sea, warning that any conflict could disrupt international trade and the global economy.
Tensions in the decades-old territorial dispute between six Asian claimants have risen in recent weeks after Chinese vessels converged near a ship the Philippines ran aground on a reef in 1999 to mark its territory.
"Somewhere in the region, there have emerged preferences for unilateral might, groundless claims and actions that run counter to international law and stem from imposition and power politics," Nguyen Tan Dung said in a speech on Friday at the Shangri-La Dialogue, an annual regional security forum in Singapore.
"A single irresponsible action or instigation of conflict could well lead to the interruption of huge trade flows, causing unforeseeable consequences not only to regional economies but also to the entire world," he said in remarks translated from Vietnamese.
China claims almost all of the South China Sea as its territory, setting it directly against the Philippines and Vietnam as it displays the growing "blue water" reach of its navy and the United States turns more of its attention to Asia.
Brunei, Taiwan and Malaysia also claim parts of the South China Sea, whose waters are vital to the international flow of goods and energy and whose seabed is believed to contain rich deposits of oil and natural gas.
US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel was attending the three-day forum convened by the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), with the US "pivot" toward Asia, the region’s military build-up and the South China Sea high on the agenda.
Stressing the need for "strategic trust", Dung said the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) must stay united and strong, without any of its 10 members 'forced to take sides with one country or the other for the benefit of their own relationships with big powers."
ASEAN has been talking to China about a binding code of conduct to ease tensions but Beijing has said it will negotiate "when the time is ripe". ASEAN foreign ministers are due to meet in Thailand in August to forge a position on the code of conduct before meeting Chinese officials in Beijing.
Vietnam will not be a military ally to anyone or allow any country to set up military bases on its soil, Dung said, adding the modernization of its forces was “only for self-defense and to safeguard our legitimate interests”.
"OPPORTUNISTIC ASSERTIVENESS"
China’s response to the actions of its rival claimants may be part of a very long-term negotiating strategy, said Christian Le Miere, a senior fellow at the IISS.
"I would call it a form of opportunistic assertiveness whereby China is often aware that these actions are going to happen and then uses them as a justification for its overzealous reactions," Le Miere told a news conference.
"What we will continue to see is China trying to change the facts on the water and trying to build a stronger legal case and adapt the legal environment to its own benefit wherever possible and continue with its maximalist claims because they will, in the future, provide China with a stronger negotiation position."
A Chinese military think-tank, the Centre for National Defense Policy, said this week the US pivot to Asia had "shattered" the relative calm of the South China Sea.
"While the conditions do not yet exist for a large-scale armed clash, the dispute is becoming normalized and long-term … and ineffective management may lead to a serious crisis," the report said, according to the China News Service.
Washington says it is focusing more security, economic and diplomatic attention on Asia to engage the fast-growing region, which has fuelled Chinese suspicions that the United States is trying to contain its economic and military might.
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 10:31 PM PDT


US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel (C) poses with Japan’s Defense Minister Itsunori Onodera (L) and South Korea’s Defense Minister Kim Kwan-jin at the 12th International Institute for Strategic Studies Asia Security Summit in Singapore. (Photo: Reuters)
SINGAPORE — The US military will devote more air power, ground troops and high-tech weaponry to the Asia-Pacific region as it moves ahead with a strategic rebalance, the new US defense chief said on Saturday in a speech that accused China of cyber incursions.
In remarks laying out his vision for regional security, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel assured allies and partners at the annual Shangri-La Security Dialogue in Singapore that the United States was fully able to continue its strategic pivot to the region despite budget constraints at home.
“It would be unwise and short-sighted to conclude … that our commitment to the rebalance cannot be sustained,” he said in prepared remarks, noting the United States represented 40 percent of global defense spending even under the “most extreme budget scenarios.”
Hagel sketched out some of the region’s thorniest security issues, including North Korea’s effort to develop nuclear weapons and missiles, competing territorial claims in the seas around China and disruptive activity in space and cyberspace.
While noting US concerns about cyber intrusions linked to the Chinese government and military, Hagel underscored his belief that resolving many regional security issues would require closer cooperation between Washington and Beijing.
“Building a positive and constructive relationship with China is … an essential part of America’s rebalance to Asia,” he said. “While the US and China will have our differences … the key is for those differences to be addressed on the basis of a continuous and respectful dialogue.”
On Friday, Hagel said cyber threats posed a “quiet, stealthy, insidious” danger to the United States and other nations, and called for “rules of the road” to guide behavior and avoid conflict on global computer networks.
CHINA QUESTIONS US MILITARY FOCUS
In questions and answers after Hagel’s speech, Chinese Major General Yao Yunzhu, an expert on US-China defense relations, asked the Pentagon chief what the United States could do to reassure China it really wants a positive relationship when it is focusing so many military resources on the region.
“That’s really the whole point behind closer military-to-military relationships,” Hagel said. “We don’t want miscalculations and misunderstandings and misinterpretations. And the only way you do that is you talk to each other, you have to be direct with each other … And I think we’re on track with that.”
Hagel outlined numerous military contacts between the two countries over the past year and said the United States encouraged the responsible rise of China and other powers because they would have a vested stake in regional stability.
The speech to the Asian security summit was Hagel’s first as defense secretary. But as a US senator he was an early supporter of the event, led the US congressional delegation to the inaugural session and has addressed the group several times.
Hagel emphasized US efforts to deepen ties with allies and partners in the region through both bilateral and multilateral engagement. He announced he was inviting defense ministers from the ASEAN grouping of nations to a first-ever US-hosted meeting in Hawaii next year.
“Relationships, trust and confidence are what matter most … in the region,” Hagel said.
The US defense chief used the speech to underscore his long experience with Asia – from his military service in Vietnam, to business travels in China as a cell phone executive to later visits to the region as a US senator.
“What I took away from all these experiences was a firm belief that the arc of the 21st century would be shaped by events here in Asia,” Hagel said, adding that was clear the United States would need to rebalance its resources toward the region once it ended its wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Hagel’s predecessor, Leon Panetta, told the Shangri-La gathering last year that the United States would commit 60 percent of its naval forces to the Asia-Pacific by 2020, a shift of about eight ships from the current deployment.
Building on that, Hagel told the conference the US Air Force would commit 60 percent of its overseas-based aircraft and airmen to the region – about the same level as now – while US Army troops and Marines would resume their Asia-Pacific roles as they draw down following the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Hagel said in the future the Pentagon would “prioritize deployments” of its most advanced weapons systems to the Pacific, including the radar-evading F-22 Raptor jet fighter, the stealth F-35 Joint Strike Fighter and the Virginia-class fast attack submarine.
He indicated the region could soon see other advanced systems as well, noting the Navy planned to deploy a directed energy laser weapon on the USS Ponce next year and last month successfully launched an experimental jet drone from an aircraft carrier for the first time.
“Combined with new concepts, doctrine and plans that integrate these new technologies and other game-changing capabilities, we will ensure freedom of action throughout the region well into the future,” Hagel said.
Posted: 02 Jun 2013 10:21 PM PDT


Student Scott Teng (L) speaks during a demonstration at "Speaker’s Corner" in Singapore October 5, 2008, when a small group protested against censorship at a university newspaper. (Photo: Reuters)
Singapore’s blogging community is rebelling against a stringent new law that requires online news sites to put up a performance bond of US $40,000 and to submit to government censorship, calling for the general public and bloggers to rally next Saturday against the measure.
Last Tuesday, the Singapore Media Development Authority issued the new regulations, which it said were designed to place the websites "on a more consistent regulatory framework with traditional news platforms which are already individually licensed."
The protest group, calling itself "Free My Internet," is asking Singaporeans to rally in Hong Lim Park, the site of Singapore’s speaker’s corner, where a May 1 protest drew 3,000 participants protesting the government’s plans to let in vast numbers of new immigrants. It was said to be the biggest protest crowd in Singapore in modern times.
"We encourage all Singaporeans who are concerned about our future and our ability to participate in everyday online activities and discussions, and to seek out alternative news and analysis, to take a strong stand against the licensing regime which can impede on your independence," the organizers said.
"We urge Singaporeans to turn up to send a clear message to our elected representatives to trust the Singaporeans who elected them."
The message was signed by 35 bloggers, who asked all Singapore bloggers to go black for 24 hours from midnight June 6.
"You can choose to create your own blackout notice, or use www.freemyinternet.com we have created for your convenience," the group said. "When you reopen your blog, write your account of the protest, about the new regulations and censorship, or anything related to media freedom in Singapore. Share your thoughts. Share your hope that the light that free speech provides will not go out on us."
The Speaker’s Corner, modeled after London’s free speech site of the same name, is hardly free. Demonstrations are allowed only by Singapore citizens and attended by Singapore citizens. Banners, films, flags, photographs, placards, posters, signs, writing or other visible representations or paraphernalia containing violent, lewd or obscene material must not be displayed or exhibited, the government says.
Events must not deal with any matter that relates directly or indirectly to any religious belief or to religion generally, or which may cause feelings of enmity, hatred, ill-will or hostility between different racial or religious groups.
Events adhering to the regulations are not immune from other existing laws, such as those relating to defamation and sedition, which in Singapore can be extremely broad, especially when the Lee governing family is mentioned.
Asia Sentinel’s attempts to reach the Media Development Authority by telephone and email went unanswered last week.
The Singapore-based Channel News Asia, however, quoted the agency in an article on May 29 as saying the new licensing framework "is not intended to clamp down on internet freedom," adding that the regulations will only apply to news sites that meet the content and reach criteria.
But while the government was characterizing the new regulations as merely bringing the internet into line with print publication restrictions, the protesters said, they apply to all content on the news sites including readers’ comments. In the recent past, the Singapore government has gone after news sites for not erasing what are deemed to be offending comments fast enough, threatening lawsuits.
Any blog that reaches more than 50,000 unique visitors in a month and prints a single article of Singapore news within two weeks is liable to come under the regulation and to be forced to withdraw the story within 24 hours or be faced with forfeiting the bond although the bigger problem, for most bloggers, is coming up with the money in the first place.
Although bloggers have been a circumspect presence in Singapore for more than a decade, the government apparently grew irritated by reporting particularly by Yahoo News, the giant news aggregator that claims nearly 700 million Internet readers across the planet, for carrying stories on the arrest and deportations of striking Chinese bus drivers last December and the aftermath.
Among sites named as currently falling under the MDA’s guidelines, including Asia One, Business Times, Channel News Asia, Omy, Stomp, Straits Times, TNP, Today Online, Zaobao, and Yahoo, Channel News Asia reported.
"The License also makes it clear that online news sites are expected to comply within 24 hours to the MDA’s directions to remove content that is found to be in breach of content standards," the authority said on its website.
Presumably, that would mean Yahoo must remove the offending articles about the striking bus drivers, Leslie Chew and others within 24 hours of being notified by the authority. In particular, the MDA said the websites must take down content that "is prejudicial to racial harmony."

Sunday, June 2, 2013

Portrait of A Displaced People: Lashio’s Muslims at Mansu Temple




Posted: 02 Jun 2013 04:31 AM PDT
A mother cradles her child amongst the 1,400 strong crowd of displaced Muslims in Lashio. To see more photos click on the box below. (Photo: Steve Tickner / The Irrawaddy)

A mother cradles her child amongst the 1,400 strong crowd of displaced Muslims in Lashio. To see more photos click on the box below. (Photo: Steve Tickner / The Irrawaddy)
LASHIO, Shan State — On Tuesday night an argument between a Muslim man and a Buddhist petrol vendor sparked another outbreak of anti-Muslim violence in Burma, this time in Lashio, Shan State.
The northeastern mountain town was suddenly torn apart by inter-communal violence, as Buddhist mobs went on a rampage, destroying Muslim-owned shops and religious buildings, and clashing with Muslim men on the street.
By Thursday, hundreds of Muslim families had been forced to flee the violence, often at a moment's notice. They were only able to carry a few basic belongings and rushed their children to safety. Armed police and soldiers trucked the Muslims away from the town center, where many owned shops and businesses, and brought them to a Buddhist temple complex called Mansu.
Their lives thrown into turmoil, more than 1,400 displaced Muslims are suddenly stranded at the temple and reliant on emergency food donations by the World Food Program.
Most are ordinary Burmese citizens — mothers and fathers, extended families — who lost homes, businesses and livelihoods. Their faces carry expressions of deep sadness and anxiety, and the looks in their eyes seem like a silent plea for you to understand their plight.
And whilst the adults understand the full gravity of their situation, children make new friends, find ways to amuse themselves and continue to smile and play amidst the palpable fear and uncertainty which pervades the scene
All across Burma, Muslim minority communities now live in daily fear of a sudden outbreak of violence carried out by a small, radical group, who claim to represent Burma's Buddhist majority.
After anti-Muslim violence broke out in Arakan State about one year ago, these groups have sought to exploit a religious divide in the country. They have destroyed and looted Muslim neighborhoods and business with impunity, driving thousands of families from towns and villages where they lived for decades.
These newly displaced people represent a human a tragedy which risks undoing Burma's celebrated democratic transition and dashing the hopes of those who wish a better future for all of the country’s citizens.
Posted: 01 Jun 2013 09:00 PM PDT
A young cook prepares food in the kitchen of a Chinese restaurant in Lashio, one of the few restaurants which opens in the aftermath of clashes between Buddhist and Muslim in northeastern Shan State. (Photo: Steve Tickner / The Irrawaddy)

A young cook prepares food in the kitchen of a Chinese restaurant in Lashio, one of the few restaurants which opens in the aftermath of clashes between Buddhist and Muslim in northeastern Shan State. (Photo: Steve Tickner / The Irrawaddy)

Friday, May 31, 2013

The Irrawaddy Magazine





Posted: 31 May 2013 06:06 AM PDT
Food rations provided by the World Food Program are pictured in the foreground as Muslims seeking shelter at a monastery listen to a speech by Religious Affairs Minister San Sint at Lashio Township on May 31, 2013. (Photo: Reuters / Soe Zeya Tun)

Food rations provided by the World Food Program are pictured in the foreground as Muslims seeking shelter at a monastery listen to a speech by Religious Affairs Minister San Sint at Lashio Township on May 31, 2013. (Photo: Reuters / Soe Zeya Tun)
LASHIO, Shan State—Three days after anti-Muslim riots first broke out in Lashio, Shan State, more than 1,400 people were sheltering on Friday at a Buddhist monastery being used as a temporary camp for those displaced by the violence.
The five small buildings that comprise the monastery remained crowded with the displaced as the UN World Food Program arrived in the morning to hand out provisions such as rice, cooking oil and beans.
Toilets, space and clean water at the monastery appeared to be in short supply.
Tin Tin Soe, a 22-year-old Muslim woman at the Buddhist monastery where the displaced have sought refuge, was forced to flee her home with her 12-day-old baby girl when rioting Buddhists descended on her neighborhood.
Health workers have been providing the young mother with advice on how to keep herself and the baby healthy under the trying conditions.
Another woman, Tin Myo Oo, was also displaced by the rioting, along with her 7-day-old boy.
The camp authority announced on Friday morning that some victims at the camp would be moved to a nearby football stadium in an attempt to alleviate the crowded conditions. People continued to arrive at the camp throughout the day, despite the fact that the streets of Lashio appeared to have calmed.
Speaking to the crowd, Tin Aung, a local Muslim leader, encouraged some of the IDPs to follow authorities' instructions on moving to the football stadium.
"It will not be dangerous to move and stay there. I wanted to request that our people agree to move when the authority tells you to do so, because there is not enough space here."
Win Myint Oo, a Muslim leader in the town, said that as of early on Friday afternoon, the monastery had accepted 1,400 people, with more arrivals expected later. Authorities were still searching for displaced families, he said, and would continue to bring them to shelter.
When The Irrawaddy visited on Friday, the atmosphere at the monastery was grim, with some IDPs crying as they stepped out of vehicles and entered the camp.
Elsewhere the situation in Lashio appeared to be stabilizing, after anti-Muslim rioting shook the town earlier this week, destroying a mosque, an Islamic orphanage and other buildings.
The violence began on Tuesday after a Muslim man allegedly poured gasoline on a Buddhist woman and set her alight, with mobs forming to take revenge after the attack. Rioting continued the next day, with casualties confirmed by Wednesday evening.
Buddhist stores had re-opened on Friday and many people were returning to their daily routines, though Muslims said they were still frightened to walk around town because they feared further attacks.
Dozens of people have been arrested for their suspected roles in the fighting, according to the Ministry of Information, which said authorities were interrogating detainees and would continue to search for more suspects.
"We'll form a committee to investigate and determine who instigated the unrest," Khin San, the ministry's deputy director, told The Irrawaddy. "We have arrested 40 people so far."
Some residents called on authorities to quell anti-Muslim sentiment by banning nationalist Buddhist rhetoric.
"I don't think this violence will stop unless the authorities ban tapes with 969 speeches," Naing Oo said, referring to a nationalist Buddhist movement that calls on Buddhists to shun Muslim businesses. Monks promoting the movement have traveled the country giving speeches, which are recorded on audiotapes and distributed.
Naing Oo said he knew people in Lashio who had expressed extremist ideas and joined in the rioting after Buddhist monks held 969 talks near the town.
Lashio is the latest town in Burma to be hit by spreading anti-Muslim violence. In March, anti-Muslim riots in the central Burma town of Meikhtila left more than 43 people dead, while sectarian clashes in west Burma's Arakan State killed more than 180 people and displaced more than 140,000.
Posted: 31 May 2013 05:15 AM PDT
The agreement aimed at reducing military tensions that was signed by Burma's government and ethnic Kachin rebels on Thursday is welcome news, but one must maintain cautious optimism regarding Kachin State's peace prospects.
The nature of the meeting that led to the agreement on Thursday was very different from past peace talks.
At the request of the Kachin rebels, UN officials, Chinese diplomats and representatives of eight other ethnic militias attended as observers for the first time and the two sides met in the Kachin capital Myitkyina. Previous meetings held since the conflict resumed in 2011 were closed-door discussions organized in China that were observed only by the Chinese.
The Kachin Independence Organization (KIO) has learned an important lesson from its past experience of negotiating with Naypyidaw, yet it seems unlikely that it will now rush into a ceasefire agreement.
In 1994, six years after Burma's military came to power through a bloody coup and while it was engaging in human rights abuses and military operations in ethnic regions, Kachin leaders reached a secret ceasefire agreement. The KIO went back into the "legal fold", as the military regime put it, leaving an alliance of ethnic rebel groups based along the Thai-Burmese border in disarray.
It was a fatal mistake. Why? The Kachin people did not accept the ceasefire and the image of the KIO among its people went downhill.
When the ceasefire broke down in June 2011 and fighting resumed in Kachin State, the KIO and its armed wing, the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), regained popular support from Kachin people at home and abroad.

Aung Zaw is founder and editor of the Irrawaddy magazine. He can be reached at aungzaw@irrawaddy.org.
Young Kachin men working overseas and in neighboring countries hurriedly returned to Kachin State to join the KIA to fight the Burmese soldiers. Those who could not return organized social media campaigns and raised funds. Kachin people said KIO/KIA leaders are rich, but soldiers are poor so "we must support them".
In one case, a Kachin woman living in the West reportedly donated US $6,000 to the ethnic guerrilla forces. Many followed suit and provided the rebels with financial support — though no figures are available on how much overseas money reached Kachin State, the amount is believed to be substantial.
Prime Minister Thein Sein pledged to make peace with ethnic groups after assuming office in 2011. Initially, he claimed that the KIO did not represent the will of Kachin people, and that they were but a small insurgent group causing trouble in northern Burma. The response by the Kachin people during the recent conflict proved that he was wrong.
Faced with a choice between the KIO and the Burmese government, the ethnic Kachin will choose their own army and politicians, who can protect their culture, identity, religion (most Kachin are Christians) and natural resources. They simply won't trust the Burmese government to do the same.
Moreover, the war in Kachin State is not just about politics. The state is rich in jade and other natural resources. During the truce period, the Burmese army encroached on many areas once controlled by the KIA, bringing in tycoons from central Burma and China to remove the jade and other precious stones, and to log vast swathes of forest for valuable timber.
Some Kachin leaders and businessmen who collaborated with the Burmese and Chinese didn't mind, but locals looking at the rampant looting of their natural resources were upset. This is one important reason why the Kachin rebel army wanted to regain control over lost territory.
After a 17-year-old of ceasefire broke down and fighting resumed in June 2011, the KIO immediately won back the hearts and minds of the Kachins.
But fighting a war ultimately means wanting peace for your people.
When crowds of Kachin people provided a raucous welcome to the KIO/KIA delegation to Myitkyina earlier this week, they knew they had to demand an agreement that benefits ordinary Kachins—and not just the KIO/KIA leadership.
In a response to these experiences with Naypyidaw and its own people, the KIO have become more strategic and savvy.
Kachin rebels leaders demanded the presence of the UN (they also wanted US and UK diplomats to join, but the Chinese reportedly blocked this request) and agreed to sign an initial agreement to reduce military tensions, but they stopped short of signing a ceasefire without gaining more concessions.
If further progress is made and the next round of negotiations prove to be fruitful, a peace deal could soon come within reach.
Political observers and Kachin religious leaders and intellectuals say that they will wait and see how the KIO will seek to achieve further progress. Everyone cautiously welcomed the news of the agreement, but Kachins want to know if KIO will abandon their interests again when the government offers a deal.
On the Burmese side, Aung Min, the government's chief peace negotiator, can go back to Naypyidaw with some good news to present it to President Thein Sein, who reportedly closely followed the talks from the capital.
Political observers note that Burma's leaders are eager to showcase a peace deal to the international community before the 2014 Asean Summit, which is to be chaired by Burma. There is also pressure from Naypyidaw's newfound Western friends, who now have vested political and business interest in the last "frontier market" in Asia, which is located strategically on China's doorstep.
Also significant during this week's meeting was the role of the armed forces. They have suffered heavy casualties during the fighting and finally ordered in the air force to attack the Kachin rebel stronghold on the Burma-China border in late December.
Lt-Gen Myint Soe, a high-ranking government army official who commands the Bureau of Special Operations-1, which oversees military operations in Kachin State, attended the latest talks. Snr-Gen Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the armed forces, instructed him and granted him full authority to reach an agreement.
Here is what Myint Soe told reporters in Myitkyina: "Even though we cannot yet sign the ceasefire agreement, we are satisfied with the results that we have reached so far."
"Whatever the Tatmadaw did in the past, we and the KIO are brothers. So this time, we are trying to reconcile with our KIO brothers. This is like a common quarrel between a husband and wife," he said. "The Tatmadaw never breaks the promise we make or our discipline."
Extreme caution is needed here because Burma's military have made such statements before during their dealings with ethnic rebels. Moreover, in an exclusive with The Irrawaddy on Friday, Myint Soe also stated that ultimately the KIA would have to integrate into the Burmese military.
"Even though there may be many different armed groups, they all must be under the commander-in-chief of the armed forces. This is clearly mentioned in the Constitution," he said, before adding, "It doesn’t mean that Burma's Tatmadaw will control all [ethnic] territories."
Everyone, including the UN and the Chinese, are nonetheless upbeat over the new agreement. KIA leader Gen Sumlut Gun Maw said it would help prevent an outbreak of clashes, but he added that it was not a ceasefire.
Other ethnic leaders are also cautious since they know that Kachin rebels once before left an ethnic alliance when they made a deal with the Burmese government. This time, the Kachin courted their ethnic allies in the United Nationalities Federal Council and with political and financial assistance brought them back on board with their agenda.
"We will try to avoid [military] engagement, but we can't guarantee an end to the war," Gun Maw said. He cautioned that he was pleased with the preliminary agreement, but added, "We will have to discuss the details."
After a series of fierce battles in northern Kachin State in the past two years, it seems that the government and Kachin now acknowledge that talking is better than shooting, but when and how they can reach a stable ceasefire agreement remains to be seen.
Posted: 31 May 2013 03:20 AM PDT
A camp for internationally displaced persons is seen in Kachin State. The government's top peace negotiator on Friday said IDPs would be able to return home soon. (Photo: JPaing / The Irrawaddy)

A camp for internationally displaced persons is seen in Kachin State. The government's top peace negotiator on Friday said IDPs would be able to return home soon. (Photo: JPaing / The Irrawaddy)
MYITKYINA, Kachin State—One day after a preliminary peace agreement between the Burmese government and ethnic Kachin rebels, Minister Aung Min from the President's Office said internally displaced people (IDPs) in Kachin State could soon return home.
During visits to three refugee camps in Burma's northernmost state on Friday morning, the minister was accompanied by UN special envoy Vijay Nambiar and Lt-Gen Myint Soe, a high-ranking government army official who commands the Bureau of Special Operations-1, which oversees military operations in Kachin State.
"Internally displaced people here should be prepared to go home soon," Aung Min told more than 500 refugees at Thagaya camp in Wai Maw Township.
"You have to be prepared to take part in the national development process, because yesterday we signed a preliminary agreement that will reduce military tensions in northern Burma and lead to further progress toward reaching a peace deal," he added.
The minister said the IDPs could return home within two months but that detailed plans would need to be discussed with the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO). "It will take a little bit of time," he said.
Tens of thousands of Kachin people have been displaced in fighting between Kachin rebels and the government since a longstanding ceasefire broke down in 2011.
Many of the IDP camps are overcrowded and lack supplies, according to activists and aid workers. The government has prevented international aid groups from accessing camps in rebel-controlled territories near the border with China, although a UN convoy was allowed to bring aid in February.
The UN's Nambiar said on Friday that the IDPs could leave the camps soon and that the United Nations would continue assisting Burma's government and the KIO.
"Before the peace talks, sadness and frustration were written on the faces of Kachin people I saw," he said. "After the talks, I saw expectation on all their faces."
Myint Soe from the government army said he could not guarantee exactly when the IDPs would be able to go home, but that it would not be long.
Camp residents praised the minister's news but also voiced concern for their safety.
"We really want to go home, but only if there is genuine ceasefire," one IDP told Aung Min. "Plus we have no money to resume our livelihoods, and our neighborhoods have been riddled with landmines. I'm worried about our children's education, too."
In response, the minister said that after the government established trust with the Kachin Independence Army (KIA), de-mining programs would begin in the state.
"We will support food, education and so on," he added. "But our government alone can't handle all of these tasks. It must be an all-inclusive process."
Burma's military has been at war against Kachin rebels for decades, but both sides signed a ceasefire agreement in 1994. The conflict flared again up in June 2011 after the longstanding ceasefire broke down. Fighting escalated in December last year until February, when clashes became less frequent.
The war has displaced tens of thousands of people. In Myitkyina and Wai Maw alone, more than 12,000 people are currently staying in 39 camps, although there are many other camps in the state.
On Thursday, a government negotiation team and the KIO signed a seven-point statement in which both sides agreed to "undertake efforts to achieve de-escalation and cessation of hostilities" and to "continue discussions on military matters related to repositioning of troops," according to two points from a translation of the agreement.
Officials said the agreement—although not a ceasefire—marked an important step toward ending clashes.
The US Embassy in Rangoon said the United States was encouraged by the agreement and would continue to closely follow the political, military and humanitarian situation in Kachin State, according to a press statement from the embassy on Friday.
Posted: 31 May 2013 03:13 AM PDT
A demonstration last year in support of Brang Shawng in the Kachin State capital Myitkyina. (Photo: Jinghpaw Kasa Blog)

A demonstration last year in support of Brang Shawng in the Kachin State capital Myitkyina. (Photo: Jinghpaw Kasa Blog)
MYITKYINA, Kachin State—The government will release ethnic Kachin detainees who were arrested under the Unlawful Association Act, including Brang Shawng, a top official said on Friday.
Minister Aung Min, the government's top peace negotiator with ethnic rebels, said the government would remove the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO) from its list of unlawful associations, and that the detainees would subsequently be freed.
The minister from the President's Office made the pledge during talks with internally displaced persons in the Kachin State capital of Myitkyina, in response to a question about Brang Shawng, a Kachin farmer whose arrest has been was criticized by activists and Kachin residents.
"Before, when the KIO and the KIA [Kachin Independence Army] were declared as unlawful associations, he was arrested for communicating with it [the KIO]," the minister said of Brang Shawng, while speaking at the Janmai Kaung Baptist camp for IDPs on Friday, after government peace negotiations with the KIO earlier this week. "But now that we have established peace with the KIO and KIA, the group must be removed from the declaration. If so, those arrested under the Unlawful Association Act, including Brang Shawng, will be automatically released."
Brang Shawng, who lived in Janmai Kaung camp before his arrest, was accused of communicating with the KIO and arrested in June last year. His case was heard in court this week on Thursday but a final verdict has not yet been reached.
"Whether he is sentenced to prison or not, I will release him within a week," Aung Min told the Kachin IDPs.
But the minister added, "I cannot take him now from the court. We have to wait until the court hearing is finished."
"It would have been easy for me to take him out immediately if we were still under the military regime, but not under the current democratic system," he said.
Aung Myat, an IDP from the camp, told The Irrawaddy that he wanted "authorities to solve the problem in a way that is just."
In Kachin State, 76 people have been accused of violating the Unlawful Association Act, with 16 cases still proceeding.
The highly criticized act was used by the former military regime to detain dissidents who communicated with exile organizations and ethnic rebel groups.
The law has come into question after Burma's nominally civilian government signed ceasefire agreements with most major ethnic armed groups, with critics saying the law threatened to invalidate the government's peace process and communication with those groups.
The pledge to release detainees in Kachin comes after peace talks this week between the government and the KIO, who on Thursday signed a preliminary agreement that would reduce military tension and lead to further progress toward reaching a ceasefire.
The KIO's armed group, the KIA, has been fighting a war against the government's army since a ceasefire between both sides broke down in 2011.
Kachin lawmaker Doi Bu said the participants in this week's peace talks discussed the release of those arrested under the Unlawful Association Act.
"We asked them to declare the removal of all the ethnic armed groups from unlawful group," she said, adding that the possible date for the release would depend on the government.
Posted: 31 May 2013 02:25 AM PDT
Dr. Tin Myo Win, the personal physician for opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, is seen at the Muslim Free Hospital in Rangoon, where he often performs 10 surgeries in a single day. (Photo: JPaing / The Irrawaddy)

Dr. Tin Myo Win, the personal physician for opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, is seen at the Muslim Free Hospital in Rangoon, where he often performs 10 surgeries in a single day. (Photo: JPaing / The Irrawaddy)
With a pair of glasses perched on the tip of his nose, Aung San Suu Kyi's personal physician reads notes to an assistant early one morning at a small charity hospital in downtown Rangoon, seated at a table with a vase of flowers, near an examination bed and a wooden crate stacked with books.
Dr. Tin Myo Win is widely known to be a close confidante of the democracy icon, as one of the few people permitted to regularly visit her during her years under house arrest, but he also has another important, though less glamorous, job. As the only surgeon at the Muslim Free Hospital, which offers free medical services in Burma's biggest city, he often performs 10 surgeries in a single day, if not more, for patients who would otherwise be unable to pay for treatment.  
In a country where the government's public hospitals are prohibitively expensive for most people, largely due to a starved national health budget, the Muslim Free Hospital stands out for its charity. Named for the religion of its founders, not its patients, the hospital is nonsectarian, serving all faiths and classes, although Tin Myo Win says he is the only non-Muslim department head. Thanks to his presence, the facility has become particularly popular among politicians, activists, former political prisoners and their families. "We see lots of [people] from the government, ministries, from different opposition parties and ethnic parties, the NLD [National League for Democracy], even the ruling USDP [Union Solidarity and Development Party]," he says. "It's like a small national conference."
Outside the hospital, Tin Myo Win is also on the frontlines of a movement to reform Burma's health care system, which was long neglected by the former military regime. At Suu Kyi's request, he is raising funds to help renovate one of the country's best-known public hospitals, while also developing a health policy for her NLD party. The Irrawaddy caught up with him earlier this month at the Muslim Free Hospital—before his morning round of surgeries, as he went over paperwork, took a phone call to discuss Suu Kyi's travel plans, and enjoyed a breakfast of sweet tea and mohinga soup—to learn how he's keeping busy as the country transitions from military rule.  
Question: Can you tell me about your background and how you came to work at the Muslim Free Hospital?
Answer: Professionally, I'm a surgeon, and I've been working here since 1992. Once I was in the government service as a teacher in surgery at Rangoon General Hospital, for 10 years. I left the service because during the 1988 [pro-democracy] uprising I led a very large group, the SCS, or the Supervisory Committee for Students movement. Later, I was invited by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi to join the NLD, since I was the chairperson of this committee. Later I also became the family doctor of Lady Aung San Suu Kyi.
Most patients who undergo surgery [at public hospitals] have to pay all the costs—all the bandages, the medicines, even the stitches. Here, everything is free, except if people can afford to pay, then donations are welcome. That's why I chose to work here. And it just so happens that most of the patients are politicians, student activists, and also their family members.
Q: How do you get the funding?
A: The funding, in fact, at first it was a religious practice. …Most of the Muslim community here donates to the hospital. … After I came to work here, some Western countries, including Australia and Japan, they tried to donate here. Just because I work at the hospital and also happen to be the personal doctor of Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. …And at the same time, I've gotten to meet with embassies. Not only the West, the States, but also Asian countries, like India, later China and Asean [the Association of Southeast Asian Nations] countries—they've tried to donate to this hospital.
We try to help some of those people who cannot afford other hospitals. But this hospital is a small hospital. Here we supply everything. But some cases, like heart operations, brain operations and kidney operations, we cannot afford to do them here. In the building here, there is only general surgery.
Q: What happens if you cannot perform an expensive surgery here, but a patient does not have enough money to get the procedure anywhere else? Do you just have to say sorry?
A: Sorry. Without the service, how can you help? We can't supply the money. Sometimes we refer patients to the Central Women's Hospital [in Rangoon]. They've started to offer free services. We have to refer at least one or two patients a week to other hospitals—for brain tumors, heart problems, kidney problems.
Q: How many beds do you have here?
A: In surgery, we have about 25 beds—theoretically.  Sometimes we have to put [patients] in between the beds, so we can accommodate more than 35 or 40, if necessary. In the four major departments here, there are about 100 beds total.
Q: Is that enough?
A: No, no, no. Even for myself, I have to operate about 10 cases a day, sometimes 15. Theoretically speaking, you should only perform about five major operations a day as a surgeon. Sometimes I have to stay late into the evening. But not all of these are major operations. In some cases [like routine simple surgeries], I have to train some of the young doctors to operate on those patients. But for major cases, I'm the only surgeon here, so I have to operate myself.
Q: I understand that you're part of a fund-raising committee to help renovate Rangoon General Hospital. Why do you want to upgrade that facility?  
A: It's a long story. It was the decision of Aung San Suu Kyi. Our objective isn't just to renovate, but to upgrade Rangoon General Hospital. The floor, the ceiling, everything—we need to renew it. At the same time, we need to accommodate more patients. … We decided we need to build a new hospital, not very far from the old one, near the nursing university. At present, the space is being used for car parking, but we are going to complete [the new hospital] within eight months to one year.
Q: How much money have you raised so far?
A: So far, in fact, in cash, we've gotten about 5 billion kyats [US$5.3 million] from Parliament. In the last meeting, the honorable guest happened to be Lord Darzi, the former minister of health of the United Kingdom. The speaker of the house, Shwe Mann, and the deputy speaker were also there, and they expressed that they had this amount of money [for the project]. At the same time, we are working very seriously with some of the donors, like JICA, the Japanese foundation.
Q: Beyond the hospital renovation, has there been any talk of broader health care reform?
A: In fact, this is part of my job. I recently formed the National Health Network under the NLD, in February. Then I started fundraising with a press conference at the Park Royal Hotel on April 6, and we starting working on the 7th, 8th and 9th, drafting the health policy of our country. Since the NLD is an opposition party, we need to have a very strong health policy. So we invited all the experts inside and outside the country. In that case, we're targeting not only Rangoon General Hospital, but the entire country.
We [the network] have about 11 functions. The first is networking. We're working with charities in the country, in Rangoon and outside Rangoon. We're trying to visit with specialists. … And later we will also have a mobile clinic, including an ambulance service. We have surgeons, including myself, some gynecologists, some EMT surgeons for minor operations. … And then we're trying to train doctors in all the areas we visit to do EMS, emergency medical services. If someone has a trauma or a car accident, then we need to have these services.
Q: Burma doesn't have any emergency medical services?  
A: Except for ambulance service. But even then, it's not widely practiced, and just transporting the patients from the site there [to the hospital]. We need some medics, doctors, nurses and medical equipment [on board] to save the life of the patient. Because [otherwise] when they reach the hospital, the patient is already lost.
Q: What about increasing the government health care budget?
A: Yes, of course. Universal health coverage is one of our objectives. … Since the NLD has 43 seats in Parliament, we are trying to raise the education budget and the health budget.
Regarding the health budget, they [Parliament] have increased it to about 3 percent [of the national budget]. But that's very insufficient. … I am not a parliamentarian; I cannot say the exact figure. But still, we need to work a lot for this. For the Ministry of Health, we can understand, with the amount they have in their hands, they are doing quite a good job for the people, but how can you [fix everything] with this limited amount of budget? So we have to help or assist in fulfilling the needs of the people.
Posted: 31 May 2013 03:05 AM PDT
Victims of the Depayin massacre and other activists gather in the village of Kyee, site of the killings in Sagaing Division, on Thursday, May 30, 2013, to mark the 10-year anniversary of the attack. (Photo: Kyaw Soe)

Victims of the Depayin massacre and other activists gather in the village of Kyee, site of the killings in Sagaing Division, on Thursday, May 30, 2013, to mark the 10-year anniversary of the attack. (Photo: Kyaw Soe)
Victims and activists urged the government to reveal the truth and expose the mastermind behind the Depayin massacre as they commemorated the 10-year anniversary of the slaughter at a memorial service this week in the village of Kyee, site of the killings in Sagaing Division.
"This is not to take revenge but to make sure to set a good example of the rule of law," Hla Oo, who was seriously injured in the massacre, told The Irrawaddy on Thursday.
The Depayin massacre took place in Kyee village, on the outskirts of Depayin Township in central Burma, on May 30, 2003. It was carried out by a pro-junta armed group consisting of members of the Union Solidarity and Development Association (USDA) and the Swan Ah Shin militia, who blocked the road to attack a convoy of vehicles carrying National League for Democracy (NLD) leader Aung San Suu Kyi and her supporters.
An exact Depayin death toll is the subject of considerable disagreement. The government's official reckoning is that no more than five people were killed in the attack, but regime dissidents claim that about 70 people lost their lives that day.
"Myself, I got a head injury and my arms were broken. There are many others who had their ribs, arms and legs broken. We were sent to prisons in Shwe Bo, Ye-Oo and Khandi, without taking care of our injuries. Our injuries were not well treated while we were in prison either," Hla Oo said.
Suu Kyi, her driver and some other NLD members managed to escape the massacre, but were later arrested as they entered Ye-Oo and imprisoned there. Suu Kyi was later sent back to Rangoon and placed under house arrest.
Speculation has long pegged Soe Win, who served as Secretary-2 of the former military junta at that time, as the mastermind behind the Depayin massacre. Some said that he ordered the attack without the knowledge of Khin Nyunt, who served as Secretary-1 during that time. Soe Win died in 2007.
Despite her brush with death that day, Suu Kyi has said that she is willing to let bygones be bygones with regard to the incident in Depayin.
But other victims, as evidenced by Thursday's turnout, are still seeking justice a decade later.
"We just want to reveal the truth in order to prevent a massacre like this in the future by taking lessons from what happened 10 years ago. We can forgive but can't forget how we have been ill-treated by the regime," Hla Oo said.
Posted: 31 May 2013 02:37 AM PDT
Myanmar 's 2 child policy for Rohingyas

Posted: 31 May 2013 02:15 AM PDT
A Cambodian fisherman who lives by the Mekong River casts his net outside Phnom Penh in 2011. (Photo: Reuters)

A Cambodian fisherman who lives by the Mekong River casts his net outside Phnom Penh in 2011. (Photo: Reuters)
RANGOON—The proposed construction of 11 hydroelectric dams on the Lower Mekong River has come under heavy criticism by activists who say the dams would destroy the ability of communities downstream, including in Burma, to catch fish and grow rice.
The environmental impact of the proposed dams on the Mekong's diverse animal population, including giant catfish and the Irrawaddy dolphin, outweigh any possible benefits of the project as a new source of energy, said British-born journalist Tom Fawthrop, who has extensively studied the dam project and worked in Southeast Asia for more than 25 years.
"Yes, of course the rural people in Burma, Laos, Cambodia and Thailand have the right to electricity, but they also have the right to fish. You can't eat electricity," Fawthrop said in Rangoon following the recent screening of his film "Where Have all the Fish Gone," about the potentially devastating consequences of the dam project to the Mekong's ecosystem.
The Mekong, one of Southeast Asia's major rivers, winds its way through the Burma-Laos border, as well as through Cambodia, Vietnam and Thailand.
The first dam to be built along the Lower Mekong is the 820-meter tall Xayaburi Dam, the BBC reported. That dam is being primarily funded by a Thai company, and most of the electricity generated would go to Thailand.
Although none of the proposed dams would be built along the stretch of the Mekong that runs between Burma and Laos, the dams built down river would still affect the riparian way of life there, Fawthrop said.
He said the dams would affect nutrient-rich sediment flow, which would deplete the fish population and hinder the ability of rural communities to grow rice.
The Mekong River's headwaters begin in the Tibetan Plateau and flow down through China, forming the Upper Mekong River, where four dams including the 292-meter Xiaowan Dam have already been built.
The screening of Fawthrop's film in Rangoon was intended to help educate the local population about the possible repercussions of damming major waterways, which is a hot-button issue along Burma's Irrawaddy and Salween rivers, according to Matthew Sheader, who organized the screening at the British Council.
"The planning of dams like these is something that Myanmar will be facing in the next few years," he said.
Khon Ja, who works for the Kachin Peace Network and is from a town on the banks of the Irrawaddy River, said the Mekong dam projects were comparable to the Myitsone Dam project in north Burma's Kachin State.
Although President Thein Sein halted the construction of the Chinese-backed Myitsone Dam following public outrage over the project's potential environmental and social impacts, construction is expected to resume when his term ends in 2015, Khon Ja said.
"Our Kachin heritage will be taken away with any dams built on the Irrawaddy," she said, "and the existence of our heritage is a right."
Posted: 31 May 2013 01:50 AM PDT
Ministers Soe Thane, Dr Kan Zaw and Htay Aung speak during a press conference in Rangoon on Friday about of the upcoming World Economic Forum. (Photo: Simon Roughneen)

Ministers Soe Thane, Dr Kan Zaw and Htay Aung speak during a press conference in Rangoon on Friday about of the upcoming World Economic Forum. (Photo: Simon Roughneen)
RANGOON — Minister Kan Zaw defended the government's reform record on Friday, after opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi questioned the pace of the reform process earlier this week. He stressed that the reforms had the full backing of foreign governments and international organizations.
"We are doing our reforms, starting with the political, then the economic, and these have been approved domestically and by our key international partners," said Dr Kan Zaw, Minister of National Planning and Economic Development, when asked by The Irrawaddy about Suu Kyi’s strictures.
Speaking on Monday at a gathering of the National league for Democracy, Burma’s main opposition group, party leader Suu Kyi said that "The last three years saw no tangible changes, especially in [the area of] the rule of law and the peace process." She added, "The reform started in 2010, now we have to ask the question: 'Have we got any tangible results so far?'"
Kan Zaw was speaking alongside ministerial colleagues Htay Aung, Soe Thane and Set Aung at a Rangoon preview event for next week’s World Economic Forum (WEF) — a 1000-strong gathering of political and business leaders in Asia in Burma's capital Naypyidaw.
Htay Aung, Minister for Hotels and Tourism, sought to dampen expectations about the pace of reform by arguing that Burma’s transition remains in its infancy. "Myanmar is just open to the outside world and we just started to build the journey to democratization," he said.
Soe Thane, a key advisor to President Thein Sein, acknowledged that the reform process faced serious challenges. Asked by Agence-France-Presse about Buddhist mob rampages against Muslims in Lashio, he said, "There will be a lot of challenges to and flaws in the reform process."
The violence in Lashio — the biggest town in Shan State, a region which is home to Burma’s largest ethnic minority — started after a Muslim man attacked and burnt a local Buddhist woman, prompting Buddhist mobs, including saffron-clad monks, to loot and burn Muslim shops and houses in the town.
One person was killed in what was the latest episode in a series of Buddhist-Muslim clashes across Burma, during which Muslims bore the brunt of the violence.
Such unrest could have implications for Burma's economic growth prospects, according to a report published earlier this week by a McKinsey think-tank, which suggested that the ongoing ethnic and religious tensions could undermine investor confidence.
McKinsey said the country’s much-remarked economic potential, if harnessed well, could lead to a quadrupling of its GDP to US $200 billion by 2030.
"Economic development and FDI in Myanmar will take off only if all parties remain committed to the reform agenda, the peace process and reconciliation between ethnic and religious groups succeed, and the election in 2015 marks another peaceful political transition," said the report.
In the meantime, however, the Burma government sees the forthcoming WEF event as a key opportunity to make a sales pitch to the outside world. "We can increase the importance of Myanmar as a destination for investors," said Minister Htay Aung.
The WEF comes six months ahead of Burma’s hosting of the Southeast Asia Games, a regional athletics competition, and the year before the country takes up the chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) for the first time.
In 2014, Burma will be chairing Asean for the first time after previous opportunities to head the bloc were postponed because the country was under military rule. Asean was concerned that relations with Western countries could be hindered if it allowed Burma take its turn at the helm.
The ten-state regional bloc is hoping to set up a closer-knit economic community by 2015, meaning that Burma’s frontline role next year will be pivotal to the bloc’s ambitions — which have been dismissed as far-fetched by some economists.
Burma’s tenure could also see the first enlargement of the grouping since it joined in 1997, with Timor-Leste hopeful of joining ASEAN in the near future.
For now, the WEF event maintains the international spotlight on Burma, coming two weeks after Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe's state visit to Naypyidaw, the first such visit since 1977. Three weeks ago, President Thein Sein received red-carpet treatment in The White House, the latter being the first state visit to the United States by a Burmese president since 1966.
The Japanese visit saw Tokyo pledge 20 billion yen (about $200 million) to the development of a port and industrial zone at Thilawa, located a half-hour drive from downtown Rangoon.
Asked if the well-funded Thilawa SEZ was now the government's top priority, Kan Zaw said Naypyidaw remained just as committed to setting up the Chinese-backed zone in Kyaukpyhu, Arakan State, and the Thai-supported Dawei zone, located on Burma’s southern coast.
"We have a Myanmar-Thai special corporate vehicle for Dawei development," he said. "We have plans to develop the first phase by 2014-2017 and we will see development in the near future."
Posted: 30 May 2013 11:38 PM PDT
Snr-Gen Min Aung Hlaing, right, receives the Knight Grand Cross, Order of the Crown of Thailand, in Bangkok on May 28, 2013. (Photo: New Light of Myanmar)

Snr-Gen Min Aung Hlaing, right, receives the Knight Grand Cross, Order of the Crown of Thailand, in Bangkok on May 28, 2013. (Photo: New Light of Myanmar)
The commander-in-chief of Burma's armed forces, Snr-Gen Min Aung Hlaing, has received one of Thailand's highest honors, according to Burmese state-run media.
The award, the Knight Grand Cross, Order of the Crown of Thailand, was presented to Burma's top general at a ceremony in Bangkok on Tuesday, The New Light of Myanmar reported.
According to the report, the award was conferred on Min Aung Hlaing by the commander-in-chief of the Royal Thai Army, Gen Tanasak Patimapragorn.
The award was given for promoting "friendship between the two armed forces of Myanmar and Thailand," said the report.
The order of the Crown of Thailand was established in 1869 by King Rama V and is awarded to the royalty, government employees and foreign dignitaries for their outstanding services to Thailand.
The Knight Grand Cross is the first of the seven noble classes.
Min Aung Hlaing is currently in Bangkok meeting with top personnel of the Royal Thai Army and high-ranking officials of the King's consultative council to discuss the two countries' friendship and stability, state media reports.
Min Aung Hlaing, who replaced former junta leader Snr-Gen Than Shwe as commander-in-chief more than two years ago, also visited Thailand in 2012 to discuss border security with Thai Defense Minister Yutthasak Sasiprapha.
Besides security issues, Min Aung Hlaing has also held talks with Thailand on the deep-sea port and industrial zone in Dawei, which Thai developers are hoping to turn into the largest project of its kind in Southeast Asia.
In addition to plans to open more border checkpoints to connect the Dawei project in southern Burma's Tenasserim Division to Thailand's industrial heartland, the two sides have also discussed efforts to resolve long-standing ethnic conflicts in Burma's border areas, which continue to impede on the progress of joint projects.
Posted: 30 May 2013 11:29 PM PDT
A view of the traffic near Sule Pagoda in downtown Rangoon. The city is expected to grow to 10 million inhabitants in 2040. (Photo: Reuters)

A view of the traffic near Sule Pagoda in downtown Rangoon. The city is expected to grow to 10 million inhabitants in 2040. (Photo: Reuters)
BANGKOK — Blessed with natural resources, including significant gas reserves and precious gems, Burma has the potential to more than quadruple the size of its economy by 2030 if it manages to diversify, build infrastructure and maintain political stability, a report said Friday.
The McKinsey Global Institute said Burma has the land, manpower and resources to expand the size of its economy from $45 billion in 2010 to more than $200 billion by 2030.
Growth potential rests mostly four key areas — energy and mining, agriculture, manufacturing and infrastructure. Of these, manufacturing is by far the most important since companies could conceivably relocate to Burma from China and other Asian countries where wages are rising, said the report by MGI, the research arm of management consulting firm McKinsey & Company.
"Burma is coming of age in the digital era. If it uses technology fully and innovatively — in banking, government, health care, agriculture, education, and retail — Burma could leapfrog interim development phases to become one of the world’s fastest-growing economies," Fraser Thompson, an MGI senior fellow, said in the report.
Burma’s gross domestic product is now less than 1 percent of Asia’s GDP or roughly equivalent to cities such as New Delhi and Johannesburg. It is the poorest country in Southeast Asia, its economy stunted by decades of international sanctions and strict import controls imposed by its former military junta.
Labor productivity is 70 percent lower than other countries in the region, and the population has only an average of four years of schooling. Only 4 percent of Burma’s population has enough income for discretionary spending, compared with 35 percent of the global population, the report said.
But the potential is high for growth. Burma has arable land, water and a large but unskilled workforce, the report said. What the country needs now to fulfill its potential for sharp growth is political stability, infrastructure development, and the rule of law.
Burma had one of the region’s strongest economies in the 1950s but plunged into a decline after a coup in 1962 instituted military rule with a socialist bent. Burma was declared a least-developed nation by the United Nations in 1987. The status is given to countries with the lowest indicators of socio-economic development according to the UN Human Development Index.
The country began undertaking political reforms in 2011 after the country’s military junta handed power to a nominally civilian government. But new freedoms of speech and assembly have provided opportunities for some groups to disseminate radical views, sparking violence between religious and ethnic groups. Buddhist-Muslim tensions are particularly high.
Still, foreign investors have been rushing in. In April, Ford Motor Co. announced its entry into Burma, saying it plans to open its first sales and service showroom for new vehicles by August. The US automaker joins PepsiCo, Coca-Cola, GE, Caterpillar and Danish brewer Carlsberg, which have all signed distribution deals in Burma.
Longtime ally China has been one of Burma’s biggest international backers for years, pouring billions of dollars into the extraction of gems, timber, oil and gas. Thailand has also been a significant investor. Japan, meanwhile, is stepping up its investment and has canceled billions in old debt and is doling out new low-interest loans.
"For much of the 20th century, Burma largely missed out on the spectacular growth seen across most of the global economy and most recently in its Asian peers," Richard Dobbs, a McKinsey director, said in the report. "It now has the potential to be one of the fastest-growing economies in emerging Asia."
Posted: 30 May 2013 11:21 PM PDT

Former Khmer Rouge leader Nuon Chea, "Brother Number Two", sits in the courtroom during his trial at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia in Phnom Penh December 14, 2011. (Photo: Reuters)
PHNOM PENH — Former leaders of Cambodia’s Khmer Rouge being tried by a UN-backed genocide tribunal apologized to families of victims of the regime’s atrocities, bringing a rare emotional note to an extended criminal trial dominated by the detailed recounting of names and old dates.
Khieu Samphan, the head of state of the 1970s communist regime, and Nuon Chea, the group’s main ideologist, were responding to questions posed by the so-called civil parties, who are representing the victims’ families at the trial.
The radical policies of the Khmer Rouge, who ruled Cambodia from 1975-79, are generally blamed for the deaths of 1.7 million people from forced labor, starvation, medical neglect and executions.
Both men have issued expressions of regret before for the killings, but they have denied legal responsibility and insisted they served with the best interests of their country and its people in mind.
They have also not hesitated to cast blame on their former colleagues and other parties.
The two men are charged with crimes against humanity, genocide, religious persecution, homicide and torture, though their current trial focuses on the forced evacuation of Phnom Penh, the capital, when the Khmer Rouge took power in 1975.
Their statements Thursday were notable chiefly for the context — they were responding directly to the family members who had testified in emotional detail to the manner in which they lost their loved ones to Khmer Rouge brutality.
Because prosecutors must try to prove the defendants bore responsibility for the actions, much of the testimony has sought to draw a legalistic line showing their knowledge through a chain of command. Thursday’s testimony touched on the moral implications of one of the most shocking historical episodes of the 20th century.
“I feel extremely sorry for the disappearance and extremely brutal killing of your father,” Khieu Samphan told Yim Roum Doul, claiming, however, that he did not know at the time about “the atrocities committed by the military commanders and leaders.”
“I did not know the great suffering of our people,” he said, adding that the perpetrators “must be brought to justice.”
He said he joined the Khmer Rouge not to kill fellow Cambodians but with the “determination to protect our country and to develop our country.”
“But unfortunately it turned out to be a complete disaster,” he said, describing those responsible as “the most stupid persons on earth.”
In testimony earlier this week, Khieu Samphan did not neglect to point the finger at other parties whom he believed contributed to the Cambodian holocaust.
He spoke to one civil party about the American B-52 bombing during Cambodia’s 1970-75 civil war, and the resultant death and destruction. Some scholars suggest that the bombing polarized and radicalized Cambodian society, contributing to the hash policies implemented when the Khmer Rouge took power.
He also reminded people that Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen once served with the Khmer Rouge — before defecting in 1977 — and said he should be considered more responsible than him because as a junior commander he would have been more aware of what was going on.
Nuon Chea said in his testimony Thursday that he took “responsibility morally” for what occurred during the Khmer Rouge regime, explaining that “I feel remorseful for the crimes that were committed intentionally or unintentionally and whether or not I had known about it or not known about it.”
Like Khieu Samphan, he offered condolences.
Nuon Chea, who testified from his cell by video because of poor health, has spoken of his regrets previously, in the 2010 documentary film “Enemies of the People.”
“I have always said I made mistakes. I am regretful and I have remorse. I am sorry for our regime. I am sorry,” Nuon Chea told Cambodian filmmaker Thet Sambath.
But he was also clear that the Khmer Rouge leaders had seen their primary duty as safeguarding the revolution and said suspected traitors were killed because they “were enemies of the people.”
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:23 PM PDT
US President Barack Obama meets with Xi Jinping in the Oval Office in Washington, February 14, 2012, when Xi was still China's Vice-President. (Photo: Reuters)

US President Barack Obama meets with Xi Jinping in the Oval Office in Washington, February 14, 2012, when Xi was still China's Vice-President. (Photo: Reuters)
BEIJING — President Barack Obama and Chinese President Xi Jinping face weighty issues when they meet at a private estate in California next week, but their most important task may simply be establishing a strong rapport.
Tucked away at a mansion with a private golf course on the edge of the Mojave Desert, Obama and Xi will search for the kind of personal chemistry that has eluded their predecessors for the past several decades. With the bilateral relationship growing ever more critical and complex, how well the leaders click matters even more now.
Distrust has grown between the world’s sole superpower and the rising Asian giant. Beijing sees Washington as trying to thwart China’s ascendancy. The US accuses China of widespread computer hacking and unfair trade. Meanwhile, there’s worry their militaries might be drawn into conflict as China tries to elbow aside US allies Japan and the Philippines over disputed, remote islands.
“There are a lot of problems between China and the US that aren’t going to be easy to solve. The hope, therefore, is that a way can be established so that at the times of crisis, dialogue will prevail based on trust and the personal relationship between the two leaders,” said Zhu Feng, deputy director of the Center for International and Strategic Studies at Peking University.
The June 7-8 get-together at the private Sunnylands estate of late publishing tycoon Walter Annenberg is the first face-to-face meeting between the presidents since Obama’s re-election and Xi’s promotion to Communist Party chief last November. Under China’s dual party-government system, Xi didn’t officially assume the title of president until March.
The summit comes months before the two leaders had been originally scheduled to meet, highlighting a perception on both sides that the leaders need to refocus on the US-China relationship following their political transitions and amid myriad distractions at home and abroad.
The accelerated timing constitutes “a clear message that China wants to emphasize the importance of US-China relations for the future,” said Cheng Li, a Chinese politics expert at the Brookings Institution in Washington, D.C.
It’s not clear yet how big the two delegations will be or whether Xi and Obama will meet one-on-one. Li said that’s something Xi’s stiff and formal predecessor, Hu Jintao, was unwilling to do.
But there are hopeful signs that the two men will gel. Xi already has a warm relationship with Vice President Joe Biden, whom he accompanied to western China on a visit in 2011. Xi also boasts a greater familiarity with the US than any of his predecessors, having visited frequently and maintained his ties to families he stayed with in Muscatine, Iowa, while a visiting provincial official in 1985. He also sent his daughter to Harvard.
The two men share a love of sports: swimming and football on Xi’s side, basketball and golf on Obama’s. Both are married to glamorous, high-profile wives who have played a strong role in shaping their images.
Xi’s wife, People’s Liberation Army songstress Peng Liyuan, was for many years better known to the public than her husband. Chinese media and Internet users closely followed her activities during the couple’s first formal state visits to Russia and three African countries earlier this year.
“It will be interesting to see how the chemistry will develop. It’s important, because particularly in China, personal relationships always carry a lot of weight in state-to-state relations,” said the Brookings Institution’s Li.
Xi has already proved himself a different leader by his pragmatism. With relations edgy, he was willing to forgo the pomp of an official White House visit for the lower-key meeting in California.
Trust between the countries has dwindled over the decades. After US planes bombed the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia in what Washington says was an accident during the Kosovo war in 1999, angry Chinese protesters nearly breached the US Embassy in Beijing. In the discord, Chinese President Jiang Zemin refused a call from the White House. Two years later, when a Chinese fighter jet collided with a US surveillance plane off southern China, Beijing held the American crew and waited for an acceptable apology from the US
In 2009, the US Navy accused Chinese sailors of harassing one of its ocean floor mapping vessels in a game of high-seas chicken.
The trust gap was further underscored by newly publicized claims Tuesday that China employed cyberattacks to access data from nearly 40 Pentagon weapons programs and almost 30 other defense technologies ranging from missile defense systems to the F-35 joint strike fighter.
The disclosure was included in a Defense Science Board report released earlier this year, meaning US officials knew of it before planning for the summit began. The disclosure’s public release allows US officials to highlight an issue of concern without necessarily overshadowing the summit.
China’s Defense Ministry on Thursday called the accusations faulty and said they underestimated both the Pentagon’s ability to protect its secrets, and the capabilities of China’s domestic defense industry.
“China is entirely capable of producing the weaponry needed for national defense,” spokesman Geng Yansheng told reporters at a monthly briefing, pointing to recent domestic technological breakthroughs such as the country’s first aircraft carrier, new generation fighter jets, large transport planes and the Beidou satellite system.
China has consistently denied claims its military is engaged in hacking, including those in a report by US cybersecurity firm Mandiant that traced the hacking back to a People’s Liberation Army unit based in Shanghai.
Other likely agenda items include the North Korean and Iranian nuclear programs, conflict in Syria, climate change and expanding bilateral military ties. China will likely press its claims of business discrimination in the US market, along with its deep discomfort over Washington’s shifting of military assets to Asia and renewed emphasis on its regional alliances, moves seen by China as part of an effort to contain its rise.
The perception of US decline and Chinese ascendancy forms much of the subtext to the current relationship, with Beijing seeking greater international influence commensurate with its status as the world’s second-largest economy. Many in China see the US as a waning power weakened by the economic crisis, partisan feuding and the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In their latest contribution to diplomatic argot, Chinese leaders now say they are seeking a “new model of major country relations” in their dealings with Washington. Assistant Foreign Minister Zheng Zeguang defined that Wednesday as “different from the old model featuring confrontation and conflict.”
“We believe a new model of major country relations between China and the United States should be based on mutual trust, equality, inclusiveness, mutual learning and win-win cooperation,” Zheng said at a Wednesday briefing.
Xi and Obama first met early last year when Xi, then China’s vice president, visited the White House on a trip to meet key American political players and introduce himself to the American public. The visit afforded Xi a chance to show his human side, reconnecting with his old Iowa friends, chatting with students at a school in Los Angeles and even catching part of a Lakers basketball game.
Known primarily for his pedigree as the son of a communist elder, Xi is seen by many observers as a strong nationalist willing to press territorial claims and what Beijing broadly proclaims as the “great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation.”
Unlike former President Hu, who often seemed uncomfortable outside official settings and stuck closely to his official talking points, Xi appears at ease around foreign visitors and is known for speaking without notes and allowing sessions to run well over their scheduled time limits.
“On a personal level, he’s confident, he’s on top of his brief and you get a very distinct sense that he has a roadmap in his head in terms of where China needs to go. He’s not only a very adroit political operator, but he’s also a realist,” said former US Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman.
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:15 PM PDT
North Korean defectors living in Seoul pray for peace and reunification of the divided Korean Peninsula, during a divine service at a church in Seoul April 7, 2013.(Photo: Reuters)

North Korean defectors living in Seoul pray for peace and reunification of the divided Korean Peninsula, during a divine service at a church in Seoul April 7, 2013.(Photo: Reuters)
SEOUL—Human rights groups have demanded that North Korea guarantee the safety of nine of its citizens who reportedly fled to Laos, only to be apprehended and sent back home.
Seven males and two females were flown home Tuesday via China despite a request from South Korea that Beijing not repatriate them, the Chosun Ilbo daily newspaper in Seoul reported Thursday, citing unidentified South Korean government officials. The Yonhap news agency cited a Foreign Ministry official in Seoul in its report that said the nine are aged 15 to 23.
South Korea’s Foreign Ministry has declined to confirm the reports.
The Geneva-based UN High Commissioner for Refugees said on Thursday in a statement that it is trying to locate the defectors and expressed concern that they did not receive a chance to have their asylum claims assessed.
"UNHCR is deeply concerned about the safety and fundamental human rights of these individuals if they are returned" to North Korea, High Commissioner António Guterres said.
Close to 25,000 North Koreans have come to South Korea since the end of the Korean War. The vast majority of them hid in China and Southeast Asian countries including Laos, Thailand and Vietnam before flying to Seoul.
China, North Korea’s foremost ally, does not recognize defectors as asylum seekers and has been known to return them to Pyongyang.
Under North Korean law, defectors face a minimum of five years of hard labor and as much as life in prison or the death penalty in cases deemed particularly serious. Activists say they could face torture.
"North Korea has to come clean on where these nine refugees are and publicly guarantee that they will not be harmed or retaliated against for having fled the country," said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch. "As a result of their return, they are at dire risk."
The Yonhap report said the defectors entered Laos through China on May 9 and were caught by Laotian authorities May 16. Several attempts to contact officials in Laos, a secretive and strict socialist regime in Southeast Asia, were unsuccessful.
"It’s tragic and disappointing," Kim Eun-young, an activist with the Seoul-based Citizens’ Alliance for North Korean Human Rights, said Thursday of the reported repatriation. "We fear defectors will now feel more intimidated about trying to come to South Korea through Laos or other Southeast Asian countries."
The number of North Koreans who settle in South Korea had been rising over several years before peaking in 2009 with nearly 3,000 arrivals. The South Korean constitution guarantees North Koreans citizenship after the government can establish that they are not spies.
Flows have slowed significantly since then. Last year, just over 1,500 arrived in South Korea, according to the government in Seoul.
There are unconfirmed reports that North Korea has boosted security at the Chinese border in recent years to slow the flow of defectors. Over the past year, North Korea has publicized the return of some defectors to North Korea.
The Korean Peninsula has been divided by a 4-kilometer-wide (2.5-mile-wide) Demilitarized Zone since the Korean War ended with an armistice in 1953.
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:08 PM PDT
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:08 PM PDT
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:08 PM PDT
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:07 PM PDT
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:07 PM PDT
Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi will attend an oil and natural gas summit next month, event organizers said. “Due to the very high level of international interest in Myanmar at the moment we are delighted to hear that Aung San Suu Kyi has decided to attend the Myanmar Oil and Gas Summit,” Neil McKenzie, manager at event organizer Oliver Kinross, said in a statement. The event comes amid growing scrutiny of Burma's energy sector, which was deemed the world's least transparent in a recent report by Revenue Watch Institute.
Posted: 30 May 2013 10:06 PM PDT
Ye Deight, one of Burma's best-known actors, has been charged with blasphemy for holding a one-man protest outside a church in Rangoon, according to a report by DVB. The actor held a sign saying "I love to kneel down in front of J.C. [Jesus Christ]" outside of St Mary's Church in Botahtaung Township and also became belligerent when asked to leave. Defaming religion comes with a possible two-year prison sentence.