The Irrawaddy Magazine |
- The Reuters Reporters’ Sentencing, as it Unfolded in the Courtroom
- On the Wrong Side of the Law, but On the Right Side of Truth
- ‘A Hammer Blow for the Rule of Law’
- Ways Ahead in the Peace Process?
- Ma Ba Tha Changes Name, Still Officially Illegal
- Legal Aid Center Opens in Naypyitaw
- Koh Tao Murder Convicts Living in Fear After Thailand Resumes Executions
- Reuters Case Timeline
- Seasonal Illness Claims Four Young Lives in Naga Zone
- Embassies and Rights Groups Denounce Reuters Convictions
- Two NLD Lawmakers Dismissed from Executive Committee
- Japan Braces for Likely Landfall from Strong Typhoon Jebi
- As India Adds 100 Smart Cities, One Tells a Cautionary Tale
- Myanmar-Thailand Highway Branded ‘Ecological and Social Disaster’
| The Reuters Reporters’ Sentencing, as it Unfolded in the Courtroom Posted: 03 Sep 2018 08:46 AM PDT YANGON — For possessing the phone number of an officer in an ethnic armed group, the itineraries of visits to Rakhine by Pope Francis and Vice President U Myint Swe, and police reports of violence in northern Rakhine State, Reuters reporters Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo were convicted of violating the Official Secrets Act and sentenced to seven years' imprisonment by Yangon's Northern District Court on Monday morning. The colonial-era Inn Sein Court Building was crowded with diplomats, reporters, activists and the accused's relatives, who were on hand to see the resolution of a case that has been closely monitored by both the international and local communities since the surprise arrest of the pair in Htauk Kyant on the outskirts of Yangon on Dec. 12, 2017. Before their arrest the pair was investigating the massacre of 10 Rohingya men in Rakhine State's Inn Din village by a group of local villagers, police and Army troops. The following month, the Army announced that seven soldiers had been sentenced to 10 years in prison with hard labor in a remote area of Myanmar for participating in the mass killing. The killings happened during the military's month-long clearance operations of Rakhine State's Rohingya communities following militant attacks on security outposts. The United Nations says the military crackdown has sent nearly 700,000 people fleeing to Bangladesh. Since their arrests, the two journalists have appeared at numerous trial hearings. This Irrawaddy reporter was allowed to witness the handing down of the verdict in a 50-foot-wide courtroom with a CCTV camera mounted in each corner. As the session began, Northern District Court Associate Judge U Ye Lwin entered the room, then read submissions from the prosecutor and defense lawyers, statements from suspects Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo, and the findings of the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). This took one-and-a-half hours. The judge said CID officers had found on the reporters' mobile phones the travel itinerary and security deployment information relating to Pope Francis' visit in November 2017, and the travel itinerary for Vice President U Myint Swe's trip in August 2017. He said both of these were considered top secret documents. Defense lawyers had earlier claimed that reports of the violence in northern Rakhine State and the itineraries of the pope and the vice president were not secrets as they had already been published in newspapers. The judge announced that this argument was invalid because the newspapers only carried brief announcements the visit of the vice president to northern Rakhine. He also said the classified documents of security forces referring to security reinforcements, causality reports and arson attacks in northern Rakhine’s Maungdaw Township that were found on the reporters' mobile phones had not been published in newspapers. Police Captain Moe Yan Naing, who was a key witness in the case, earlier testified that his superior officer Brigadier General Tin Ko Ko ordered him and his colleagues to arrest the reporters and charge them with violating the Official Secrets Act, but the prosecutor declared him a hostile witness and abruptly sentenced him to one year in prison for violating police discipline. Judge U Ye Lwin cited the News Media Law's Article (6) (a), drafted by former information minister U Ye Htut. It states that journalists can request documents from authorities with the exception of orders or instruction letters containing information on security matters, including statistics, photographs and records. He also cited the Media Code of Conduct's section (3) (b), which deals with the way media professionals handle sensitive information. He said the classified documents from security forces found in their possession and on their mobile phones showed that the two suspects had violated both the News Media Law and Code of Conduct repeatedly. He said it also had to be taken into consideration that the content of the documents was related to security matters and could be useful, either indirectly or directly, to insurgent groups. "The suspects did not act as ordinary journalists; they acted together with the intent of harming the interest of the state or state security," U Ye Lwin said. He concluded that these facts, as well as the attitudes of the suspects and the submissions of the prosecutor constituted sufficient evidence that the suspects breached the Official Secrets Act's Article 3 (1) (c). He sentenced them to seven years' imprisonment for violating the Act, adding that their time in detention so far would count towards their sentence. Myanmar Press Council (MPC) member U Myint Kyaw pointed out that Article (6) of the News Media Law enshrines the rights — rather than the restrictions or potential legal punishments — of media organizations, and suggested that perhaps the judge had interpreted the law as he wished. While acknowledging that he is not a legal expert, U Myint Kyaw said that inappropriately citing the News Media Law and Media Code of Conduct while sentencing the Reuters reporters was "dishonest". U Myint Kyaw said, "Some lawyers say there might be a danger of classified [documents] falling into enemy hands if the arrest occurred in an armed conflict situation," as opposed to being arrested in Yangon, as the Reuters reporters were. Within a few seconds of the announcement, police led the convicted pair away in handcuffs. As they did, the mother of Kyaw Soe Oo wept in the courtroom. Wa Lone raised his hands and told his Reuters colleagues in the courtroom: "It's OK. You know what we did. I have no feeling [about this conviction]… I believe in justice and democracy." Before he and Kyaw Soe Oo were escorted to Inn Sein Prison, he cried out, "We were unfairly treated" and "We are sentenced now for having the phone number of [Arakan Army (AA) official] Ko Nyo Tun Aung. And we are jailed for possessing the travel itinerary of vice president U Myint Swe [to northern Rakhine]. Is this fair for us? This is directly threatening and violating the freedom of the press in Myanmar as well as the democratic system." AA Vice Chief of Staff Nyo Tun Aung could not be reached for comment for this article by press time on Monday. Defense lawyer U Than Zaw Aung told reporters that the defense consistently told the judge that a map related to Pope Francis' trip in the reporters' possession was not an official document issued by the Myanmar government; in fact, it was downloaded from a German website. Moreover, details of the trip of the vice president to northern Rakhine State could easily be f0und on social media. However, the judge even included these points in his conclusions and cited them in his decision to imprison the pair for 7 years, the lawyer said. Defense lawyers said they would appeal the decision to a higher court. “We are total disappointed with today's conviction. This conviction shows that we are in a bad condition, despite the appearance that the country is heading for a functioning democratic system, freedom of expression and rule of law," U Than Zaw Aung said. Criticizing the judge's citing of the Media Law and Code of Conduct in his conclusion, Myanmar Press Council (MPC) member U Myint Kyaw said that maintaining secret information is the responsibility of official organizations; being found in possession of these documents should not be a problem, he said. If a media organization publishes the information, the relevant ministry can complain about the report if it finds a factual problem. U Myint Kyaw said the case was "apparently a trap" set by police, pointing to the fact that the documents were given to the reporters by police, who then arrested the pair immediately. Moreover, he pointed out that simply finding out the phone number of a top AA leader and the travel itinerary of Pope Francis should never be considered possession of state secrets. "If they really label such kind of information as top secret, then more than 100 journalists could be arrested. This is nonsense. If they want to do so, they can put us all behind bars." The post The Reuters Reporters' Sentencing, as it Unfolded in the Courtroom appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| On the Wrong Side of the Law, but On the Right Side of Truth Posted: 03 Sep 2018 06:18 AM PDT Myanmar's media community was hit by a powerful blow this morning. Its professionals feel sad, disappointed and under siege. Today's events have also damaged the image of the country and the integrity of the government. On Monday morning, two Reuters reporters, Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo, were sentenced to seven years' imprisonment for violating the Official Secrets Act. The two reporters found themselves under arrest on Dec. 12 after gathering information on the killing of 10 Rohingya Muslims in Inn Din village in Rakhine State's Maungdaw Township during a clearance operation by security forces last year. Many people have believed since the start that the case filed by police officials was a set-up, as suggested by U Win Htein, a leading member of the ruling National League for Democracy (NLD), right after the arrest of the two reporters. Other NLD members and lawmakers agreed, believing that the journalists were just doing their jobs. At a hearing in April, even a prosecution witness, Police Captain Moe Yan Naing, told the court that the two journalists were targeted in a police plan to entrap them by offering them "secret documents". The officer alleged that Pol. Brigadier-General Tin Ko Ko threatened police officials who failed to take steps to entrap the two reporters. He told the court that Pol. Brig-Gen. Tin Ko Ko's actions were "unethical and damaged the integrity of the country on the international stage." However, the allegation was never investigated. We know the case was handled by the police department, which is under the authority of the Home Affairs Ministry — one of three ministries controlled by the commander-in-chief of the military. We know that Myanmar's legal code remains clogged with many oppressive and outdated laws, like the Official Secrets Act, which dates back to the British colonial era, that are in need of repeal or amendment. We also know that the independence of the country's judicial system is very much in question — a legacy of previous authoritarian regimes. And we know that the attorney general is an ex-military official. Together with media professionals, diplomats and various democratic institutions, however, we believe that the NLD-led government, which was elected by a majority of the people, should have done something to stand on the side of truth and justice. The government leaders, especially President U Win Myint and State Counselor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, should understand how badly this arbitrary prosecution under their government could damage the country's image and democratic principles. As a result, the international community, democratic institutions and media organizations have even less confidence than before in the government and its de facto leader, Daw Aung San Suu Kyi. Embassies including those of the U.S., the Netherlands, the U.K. and others have condemned the court's decision and urged the government to immediately release the two reporters. President U Win Myint, since he took office in March, has underscored the role of the media in the country's democratic transition. In his inaugural speech on March 30, he said, "I wish to urge the media sector, which serves as the ears and eyes of the public, to understand the seriousness of their duties and to hold in high regard the public sector that they serve." But in this important case, which is pivotal for democracy, the president was nowhere to be seen. Even if they received ambiguous information from their subordinates, there is no reason for the government's senior leaders, especially President U Win Myint and Daw Aung San Suu Kyi, to be confused about this case. They must understand that this is case is purely about people's right to know. There is nothing wrong in what these particular Reuters reporters did; like any journalists they were simply doing their jobs by attempting to gather information so as to uncover the truth for the public. I remember reading Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's comments in the book The Voice of Hope, a compilation of interviews with her after her release from her first house arrest in 1995: "Truth is a powerful weapon. And truth—like anything that is powerful—can be frightening or reassuring, depending on which side you are on." She added, "If you're on the side of truth, it's very reassuring—you have its protection." Sadly, however, those who are now on the side of the truth don't have its protection under her government. This is deeply discouraging, and the blow against the reporters this morning also indicates that the few democratic gains our country has made are being rolled back. We cannot sit idly by and allow this disgraceful return to the past. We journalists are determined to continue carrying out our mission. Meanwhile, the government must do its part. The post On the Wrong Side of the Law, but On the Right Side of Truth appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| ‘A Hammer Blow for the Rule of Law’ Posted: 03 Sep 2018 05:26 AM PDT YANGON— The jailing on Monday of two Reuters reporters for seven years for breaching the outdated British colonial-era Official Secrets Act has been met with deep disappointment and condemned as a blow to the country's justice system, press freedom and democratic transition. The two journalists, Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo, had been detained for nine months since their arrest on Dec. 12 while investigating the killing of Rohingya Muslims in a village in Rakhine State. Right groups, press freedom advocates, the United Nations, the European Union and countries including the US, UK, Denmark and Australia called for the immediate release of the two and an end to the arbitrary prosecution of journalists for doing their jobs. Here are some reactions to the sentencing:  Scot Marciel, U.S. ambassador to Myanmar "I am sad for Wa Lone, Kyaw Soe Oo, and their families, but also for Myanmar. It is deeply troubling for everybody who struggles so hard for media freedom here. One has to ask if this process will increase or decrease the confidence that people here have in their justice system." The Embassy of Denmark in Myanmar "This is a tragedy for them and an injustice carried out under a government which came to office based on a strong commitment to rule of law. What we have seen today is not rule of law. The Official Secrets Act violates the right to freedom of expression, a right which many members of government and Parliament fought and went to prison for under the military regime. "Instead of being celebrated for their efforts to expose the conduct of Myanmar's military, Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo have now been found guilty in spite of the lack of evidence to support the prosecutor's claims. "The Embassy of Denmark calls on the government of Myanmar to undo this injustice, release Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo immediately and launch an investigation into allegations that they were set up by Myanmar's police force." (from a statement) Dan Chugg, British Ambassador to Myanmar “Speaking on behalf of the British Government and EU member states, we are extremely disappointed with this verdict and sentencing. This case has cast a long shadow over freedom of expression and the rule of law in Myanmar. In any democracy, journalists must be free to carry out their jobs without fear or intimidation; this verdict has undermined freedom of the media in Myanmar. The verdict has also struck a hammer blow for the rule of law. We have attended the trial throughout and we believe that the judge has ignored the evidence presented to him as well as ruling against Myanmar's own laws. This is a bad day for Myanmar and we call for the journalists to be released immediately." (from a statement) The Embassy of Netherlands in Myanmar "The Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands regrets the conviction of Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo and will continue to urge the government to use the means at its disposal to ensure their immediate release. This was not only a verdict to two individuals, but also a milestone verdict on the credibility of Myanmar's press freedom." ( from a statement)  Bertil Lintner, veteran journalist and Myanmar analyst "It's a sad day for press freedom in Burma but, at the same time, I want to encourage Burma's many brave and good journalists to carry on their important job. Without them, there would be a great void that cannot be filled by foreign reporters." Nicholas Coppel, Australia Ambassador to Myanmar "Australia has watched this case very closely. Embassy staff have attended all the hearings and heard the evidence, including conflicting evidence presented by prosecution witnesses. We were therefore disappointed to hear that the journalists were found guilty. "An independent media and an independent judiciary are both vital parts of a well-functioning democracy. Myanmar's democratic transition is not complete. Myanmar needs a strong and functioning justice system, and greater media freedom." (from a statement) Johan Hallenborg, Minister Counsellor to Myanmar, Embassy of Sweden “EU member states are deeply concerned about what happened today. We believe that the two journalists were merely doing their work. They shouldn’t have been put to trial in the first place.”  Daw Aye Aye Win, former AP correspondent "This has confirmed that there is no press freedom in Myanmar. This Reuters case is proof of it. "And the handing down of a long sentence will have a very negative impact upon the dignity of the government. It seems that the government does not consider [press freedom] as builder of democracy. This is the complete reverse of democratization. It is very disappointing. "When reporters are punished for doing their job, it serves as a warning to all journalists. This will forcibly divide journalists into two groups. One will exercise extra caution [about what they write], and the other will continue writing despite the harmful consequences. [The sentencing of the two reporters] seriously threatens press freedom. Journalists will exercise more caution. As they practice self-censorship out of fear of possible retribution, this will significantly impact their reporting. I'm disappointed that the government led by [State Counselor] Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is stepping into a dark era." U Aung Hla Tun, deputy information minister "I feel a little sorry for them, as I once worked as a journalist. But there is still hope for them. This is not the end. They still have a chance according to the law. They can appeal to the higher courts. I pray for them. That's all I can say. "There are laws that restrict press freedom. I recognize this fact. Those laws have been in force for years, but they are being reviewed now. On the other hand, journalists have to follow ethics. This is very important. And they must also have professional skills. "Overall, [the press] should have patience. [Reform of these outdated laws] will not take place immediately. [Journalists] should also regulate themselves. Self-regulation is essential. I don't mean self-censorship. Self-censorship comes from fear [of possible retribution]. Self-regulation comes from self-awareness and morality. "[Journalists] should know what they can and cannot do, aside from any possible legal repercussions. They should know the law. There is nothing to be afraid of. They [journalists] have to do their job. But they must be professional and ethical." Stephen J. Adler, Reuters president and editor-in-chief "Today is a sad day for Myanmar, Reuters journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo, and the press everywhere. These two admirable reporters have already spent nearly nine months in prison on false charges designed to silence their reporting and intimidate the press. Without any evidence of wrongdoing and in the face of compelling evidence of a police set-up, today's ruling condemns them to the continued loss of their freedom and condones the misconduct of security forces. This is a major step backward in Myanmar's transition to democracy, cannot be squared with the rule of law or freedom of speech, and must be corrected by the Myanmar government as a matter of urgency. We will not wait while Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo suffer this injustice and will evaluate how to proceed in the coming days, including whether to seek relief in an international forum." (from a statement) Ko Than Zaw Aung, defense lawyer "It is very disappointing. This shows the critical situation facing democracy, freedom of expression and the rule of law in Myanmar, which is said to be undergoing democratization. We'll do whatever we can [to secure] the release of the two reporters." U Sein Win, Myanmar Journalism Institute training director "A guilty verdict without strong evidence is quite disappointing. The prosecution witness testified that the case was a set-up. It couldn't be any clearer. "But the sentencing of the two shows that our judicial system is severely paralyzed. The message of the verdict is that, 'You should not seek the truth. Press freedom is not important. And you can be safe only by currying favor with those in power. Anything done by those in power is right.' "You can't ignore the truth in building a country. If a murder is treated as a state secret in a country, you may realize what type of people the leaders of that country are. Aren't we going to do anything to correct the way the country is being built?"  Ko Thalun Zaung Htet, Myanmar Press Council member-elect "This indicates that democracy is doomed and there is no press freedom in Myanmar, and that the NLD [National League for Democracy] has become authoritarian. Soon, we journalists will take to the streets." Foreign Correspondents Club of Myanmar "The Foreign Correspondents Club of Myanmar is gravely dismayed and condemns in the strongest possible terms the sentencing of two award-winning Reuters journalists to a staggering seven years in prison." "The conviction and harsh sentence strike a blow to the journalistic profession and pose a grave threat to press freedom in Myanmar. "We, the FCCM, would like to reiterate our call for the immediate release of Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo and also call for an impartial review of the case on appeal. "We further urge the government to ensure that journalists are allowed to carry out their profession without fear of harassment and intimidation." (from a statement) Assistance Association for Political Prisoners "The case raises real concerns regarding the impartiality of the judicial system in Burma. Both parliaments must review the Official Secrets Act, and make sure that the law should not be applied to journalists. The application of such law to journalists should be condemned and action taken to ensure what happened with Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo cannot happen again.  U Ye Naing Moe, founding director of Yangon Journalism School "The sentencing of the two Reuters reporters shows that this society is going in the wrong direction. To imprison two journalists is the very opposite of building democracy. Democracy needs an ecosystem to thrive in, and journalists are a necessary part of that ecosystem. "There must be a free and independent judicial system in society for journalists to be able to do their job. Without judicial independence, how can journalists have the courage to risk their lives to make investigative reports? The imprisonment of the two reporters has called judicial independence into question. "Every journalist who hears about this morning's sentence of seven years' imprisonment will now be placed under considerable pressure [making it difficult] to conduct investigative journalism to serve the people with good intentions. Without judicial independence that guarantees the freedom of journalists, it is very hard to conduct investigative journalism. This creates a chilling effect and spreads fear. Frankly, it is a threat to journalists to step back." Brad Adams, Asia director at Human Rights Watch "The outrageous convictions of the Reuters journalists show Myanmar courts' willingness to muzzle those reporting on military atrocities. These sentences mark a new low for press freedom and further backsliding on rights under [State Counselor Daw] Aung San Suu Kyi's government. "Myanmar's leadership should immediately quash the verdicts and release Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo." (from a statement) Federica Mogherini, spokesperson of the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy "Today's court decision to sentence Reuters reporters Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo to seven years of imprisonment undermines the freedom of the media, the public's right to information and the development of the rule of law in Myanmar. "Their sentencing and imprisonment under the Official Secrets Act of 1923 for covering allegations of serious human rights violations in Rakhine State also serve to intimidate other journalists who will fear harassment and undue arrest or prosecution for merely doing their jobs. "We therefore reiterate our expectation that the authorities ensure adequate conditions for journalists to carry out their work. The prison sentences of Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo should be reviewed and the two journalists be released immediately and unconditionally." (from a statement) The post 'A Hammer Blow for the Rule of Law' appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Ways Ahead in the Peace Process? Posted: 03 Sep 2018 05:16 AM PDT Between Aug. 30 and Sept. 1, the Myanmar Army (44th Division, 1st and 2nd Battalion) launched attacks in Dwe Lo Township in the Karen National Union (KNU)'s Papun District (Brigade 5), forcing more than 200 civilians to flee. These machine-gun and mortar attacks followed similar Tatmadaw (Myanmar military) ceasefire violations in the Ler Mu Plaw area between March and June, in which 2,500 villagers were displaced. ‘The Tatmadaw seems determined to take control of the last remaining KNU-controlled areas "in a campaign of a thousand cuts". This is despite the fact that the KNU signed a bilateral ceasefire with the government in January 2012, and was the leading Ethnic Armed Organization (EAO) to sign the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA) in October 2015. Elsewhere, the militarized state is also pushing into previously autonomous ethnic nationality-populated areas, for example through road-building projects. For now, across most of southeast Myanmar various ceasefires are still holding, and a tenuous negative peace allows villagers to begin rebuilding their lives after decades of conflict. However, in the Papun hills, state-directed violence has increased since the present government took office in 2016. Unsurprisingly therefore, many Karen and other ethnic nationality stakeholders are deeply skeptical about the peace process and fear that widespread fighting may break out again. The KNU and Karen activist and aid groups are alert to the possibility of further Tatmadaw incursions. This year, Tatmadaw attacks on KNU positions and civilians in Papun District have been by assiduously documented, followed by the speedy publication of hard-hitting advocacy statements. This proactive strategy ensures that Tatmadaw aggression will be costly for the military politically, at a time when the Tatmadaw is under international pressure because of abuses committed against the Rohingya in Rakhine State, and against other civilians in the Kachin conflict. However, such humanitarian advocacy and activism can only go so far. Salvaging a failing peace process also requires clear political strategy from EAOs and political parties. Daw Aung San Suu Kyi and her advisers reportedly plan to hold one or two more Union Peace Conferences, and then declare the “21st Century Panglong Process” finished. The resulting (so-called) Union Peace Accord would go to Parliament and form the background to election campaigns in 2020. Despite the NLD's reduced popularity among ethnic communities and urban-based political elites, and in the western and international community, the NLD will probably win the next elections. Once the Union Peace Accord is completed, the Tatmadaw would likely call more strongly for EAOs to disarm and demobilize. This would be virtually impossible for the main EAOs to accept. Unlike the U Thein Sein government, which invested significant energy and political capital in trust building, the NLD government seems not to regard EAOs as legitimate political actors. Aung San Suu Kyi and colleagues see political legitimacy as a product of participation in elections; in contrast, most EAOs derive their legitimacy from the long years of armed struggle. Although not universally popular among the country's ethnic nationality citizens, the major EAOs do nevertheless enjoy significant support among the communities they seek to represent. The NLD government inherited a peace process framed by the NCA and seems determined to see this through—not least because that is what the Tatmadaw wants. Therefore, the government (and presumably the Tatmadaw) need NCA-signatories and other EAOs to support the “21st Century Panglong Process”. For the EAOs, pulling out would be a high-risk move, exposing them to accusations of sabotaging the peace process. However, NCA-signatory groups should be getting more out of the process. The principles agreed so far in the last two UPCs are very weak, and do little to address ethnic grievances and self-determination goals. Key stakeholders have agreed on the need to re-negotiate the 'Framework for Political Dialogue', with an ambitious plan to achieve federalism and security sector reform by 2030. However, given limited interest on the government or the Tatmadaw side, any renegotiation could end up with another messy and complex framework, which doesn’t really work (or benefits the government and military, which is almost the same thing). Therefore, it could be useful to identify a small number of political priorities, which would help to deliver on some of the ethnic stakeholders' key aims. These could be negotiated by EAOs and political parties in a “fast-track” manner, in exchange for continuing to participate in political dialogue, resulting in a Union Peace Accord which could benefit the government and ethnic stakeholders. Another area for possible progress is "Interim Arrangements", as defined in Article 25 of the NCA. Myanmar's main EAOs (both NCA signatories and non-signatory groups) control sometimes extensive territory and deliver services to civilian populations, often in partnership with CSOs. In these areas, EAOs constitute the local government and generally enjoy more legitimacy locally than the Naypyitaw government or Tatmadaw, which are often considered alien, violent and predatory forces. EAOs' service delivery and governance functions should be supported, because these are often the only state-like entities providing public goods to vulnerable communities on the ground, in remote and conflict-affected areas. However, the government does not seem to recognize EAOs as governance actors, instead engaging with them underground merely as service providers (similar to CSOs), and/or as private businesses. This contradicts the NCA and undermines the possibility of peace-building efforts that could transform political and economic structures that have driven ethnic violence in Myanmar for decades. Supporting Interim Arrangements could be a key element in building 'federalism from below' in Myanmar. If EAOs are to continue participating in the 21st Century Panglong Process, they should demand concrete progress on key issues. Benchmarks or indicators would need to be established, and should be kept simple. Areas for possible progress could be education and language policy (recognition of and funding for EAOs' extensive school systems; 'mother tongue' teaching in government schools); land issues (recognition of land title documents provided by EAOs; revision of unjust existing land laws; compensation and restitution for people who have had their land unfairly taken); and equitable natural resource management. Furthermore, EAOs should demand that the government and Tatmadaw respect Interim Arrangements as previously agreed in the NCA. None of the above would prevent other ethnic stakeholders from continuing to campaign for federalism, including changes to the 2008 Constitution. In parallel, they could aim for some short-term political objectives, which could build trust and momentum in the peace process. These “peace dividends” would help ethnic communities, and also reinforce faltering local support for EAOs; in exchange, the government might be able to deliver a credible peace process. Otherwise, NCA-signatory groups should seriously consider withdrawing from a failing political dialogue. Ashley South is a Research Fellow at Chiang Mai University, Center for Ethnic Studies and Development. (See www.AshleySouth.co.uk) The post Ways Ahead in the Peace Process? appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Ma Ba Tha Changes Name, Still Officially Illegal Posted: 03 Sep 2018 04:36 AM PDT NAYPYITAW — The Buddha Dhamma Charity Foundation, formerly called the Association for Protection of Race and Religion, which was better known by its Burmese acronym Ma Ba Tha, will fade away without government intervention, said Union religious affairs minister U Aung Ko, reaffirming its illegitimacy. "Despite the name change, the illegal organization remains illegal," the minister told reporters at the Upper House on Friday. Ma Ba Tha was born in 2012 out of the 969 movement, a nationalist campaign that called for the boycott of Muslim-owned businesses. In 2013, 969 members rebranded the group as the Association for Protection of Race and Religion, which came to be better known as Ma Ba Tha. The nationalist group was successful in advocating former president U Thein Sein to approve a controversial set of four laws on race and religion that imposed restrictions on interfaith marriage, birth spacing, polygamy and conversion, believed to be targeted at Muslims. The row between Ma Ba Tha and the National League for Democracy (NLD) government erupted when Yangon Region Chief Minister U Phyo Min Thein described the group as "unnecessary" while addressing a gathering of Myanmar residents in Singapore in June 2016. Later the state-backed cleric organization Ma Ha Na announced that Ma Ba Tha was an unlawful organization and in May 2017, it banned the group from operating under its current name and ordered that its signboards be taken down across the country by July 15 of last year. Since then, Ma Ba Tha has rebranded itself as the Buddha Dhamma Charity Foundation. However, some Ma Ba Tha chapters in Mandalay and Karen State's Hpa-an refused to take down their signboards and still operate under the name "Ma Ba Tha." U Aung Ko said he has no plan to forcibly take down the Ma Ba Tha signboards in Mandalay and Hpa-an, saying that unlawful organizations that do not win public support will fade away over time. He also criticized a rally of Buddhist nationalists in Yangon in the second week of August against Ma Ha Na's order to the Buddha Dhamma Charity Foundation to take down its signs within 45 days. "They held the rally because there are no supporters or there are only a few supporters," said U Aung Ko. Ashin Sopaka, the foundation's spokesperson, told The Irrawaddy: "Our association will never fade away. We will continue working for our race and religion like we are doing now." The association is working in line with the law, and therefore, nothing can be done to it, said the monk. "I have nothing to say if the foundation is formed with good intentions and it does not incite racial or religious hatred," said U Thant Zin Tun, NLD lawmaker of Naypyitaw Union Territory's Dekkhinathiri Township. Translated from Burmese by Thet Ko Ko. The post Ma Ba Tha Changes Name, Still Officially Illegal appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Legal Aid Center Opens in Naypyitaw Posted: 03 Sep 2018 04:03 AM PDT NAYPYITAW — A legal aid center opened in administrative capital Naypyitaw's Pobbathiri Township on Saturday. The justice center is the sixth of its kind in Myanmar, implemented as part of the My Justice Program, funded by the European Union in partnership with International Bridges to Justice (IBJ). The centers offer free legal services to anyone who's been charged with a crime and can't afford to hire a lawyer, anyone who is under the age of 18, minorities, and those who are disabled or discriminated against, according to the non-governmental legal aid group. "This center is intended to assist the poor, as Dekkhinathiri District court is close to it," said Jim Taylor of the IBJ. So far, justice centers have been opened in Mandalay, Shan State's Taunggyi and Kalaw, Bago's Toungoo and Karen State's Hpa-an. Since before its official opening, the center provided legal advice for defendants in 23 cases including rape, drug, murder and robbery cases, said Daw Wint Wint Aye, an official with the center. "If those charged with crimes are too poor to hire a lawyer, they can ask for our help. We will assist them for free," she said. Justice centers aim to improve access to justice and legal aid for the poor and vulnerable, develop the legal capacity of justice sector professionals and strengthen selected rule of law institutions to better fulfill their mandates, according to the IBJ. According to the justice center, anyone whose monthly income is less than 120,000 kyats is eligible for services. And the monthly income of the family members of the defendants must also be less than 120,000 kyats per month in order to receive assistance from the legal aid group. "They only provide legal services for defendants, and not plaintiffs. Their intentions are good," said Naypyitaw-based lawyer U Khin Maung Zaw. Translated from Burmese by Thet Ko Ko. The post Legal Aid Center Opens in Naypyitaw appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Koh Tao Murder Convicts Living in Fear After Thailand Resumes Executions Posted: 03 Sep 2018 03:58 AM PDT MON STATE — Two Myanmar migrant workers sentenced to death by a Thai court for the murder of two British backpackers are living in constant fear after Thailand resumed executing death row prisoners earlier this year, the head of an NGO assisting migrant workers said. Win Zaw Htun and Zaw Lin were detained in 2014 by Thai police for the murder of a British couple on Koh Tao island, and for raping the woman. They were sentenced to death in May 2016 despite their claims that Thai police coerced their confessions. They are currently detained in Bangkok's Bang Kwang Prison awaiting the result of their final appeal. According to U Sein Htay, the director of the Migrant Workers Rights Network (MWRN), Zaw Lin has been under a lot of stress and constantly worried about the possibility of being executed since June, when Thailand put to death its first prisoner in nearly a decade. To make matters worse, Zaw Lin has been held in solitary confinement for more than a month after a fight with a prisoner. "They are really scared by what they have seen in prison. Especially Zaw Lin, who is in solitary confinement and is left alone with his thoughts; he is really frightened [of being executed]," he said. U Sein Htay and his team visited Win Zaw Htun and Zaw Lin in prison on Aug. 22. At first, prison authorities told them they would only be allowed to speak via a video call. However, after repeated requests from the team, the authorities allowed them to meet in person. U Sein Htay said both men told him they fear execution. The NGO director added that Zaw Lin asked him to inform the Myanmar Embassy in Bangkok that he was being held in solitary confinement beyond the one-month punishment period. He said he was being punished for fighting a Thai prisoner who repeatedly cursed his mother. "He requested that the Myanmar Embassy talk to the Thai prison authorities about transferring him back to a normal cell," U Sein Htay said. The MWRN sent a letter to the Myanmar Embassy conveying Zaw Lin's request, U Sein Htay said. An official from the Myanmar Embassy usually visits Zaw Lin and Win Zaw Htun every 90-120 days, but no visits have been made since Zaw Lin's solitary confinement began. Zaw Lin also requested urgent support from a team from the Lawyer's Council of Thailand (LCT) that has been assisting the two migrant workers' defense in the Koh Tao murder case, asking them to liaise with the Myanmar Embassy to ensure his immediate release from what he claims is his unfair and unlawfully extended solitary confinement. Andy Hall, international advisers to MWRN and the LCT's Koh Tao case legal defense team also wrote a letter to the Myanmar Embassy asking it to provide consular assistance to Zaw Lin. The defense team for the two convicts—comprising members of the LCT and members of labor-rights NGOs—submitted a 319-page appeal to Thailand's Supreme Court in August 2017. U Sein Htay said the defense team is still waiting for the Supreme Court to rule on the appeal. The post Koh Tao Murder Convicts Living in Fear After Thailand Resumes Executions appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Posted: 03 Sep 2018 03:37 AM PDT On Monday, the verdict on the case of two Reuters journalists, Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo, was given at Yangon's Northern District Court. After almost nine months of being shuffled back and forth between prison and the courtroom, the pair was found guilty of violating the colonial-era Official Secrets Act and each sentenced to seven years' imprisonment. The Irrawaddy looks back at the major developments in the case since they were arrested on Dec. 12. Dec. 12, 2017: Two Reuters journalists, Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo, are arrested in northern Yangon at around 9 p.m. Dec. 12, 2017: At around 10 p.m., northern district police chief Lt-Col Yu Naing seeks permission from the President's Office to prosecute the journalists under the Official Secrets Act. Dec. 13, 2017: Acting President U Myint Swe grants Lt-Col Yu Naing authority to prosecute Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo under the Official Secrets Act. The same day, the two journalists are sent to the Aung Tha Pyae Interrogation Center. They are to remain there until Dec. 26. Dec. 14, 2017: The government announces the arrest in state-run newspapers, saying the two journalists will be prosecuted for violating the Official Secrets Act for possessing important and secret government documents relating to Rakhine State and security forces. The Information Ministry says they had "illegally acquired information with the intention to share it with foreign media." The announcement says the two police officers, Capt. Moe Yan Naing and Sgt. Khin Maung Lin, will be charged with the Official Secrets Act and the Police Disciplinary Act for their interaction with the journalists. Dec. 27, 2017: The two journalists are brought to court for the first time to have their detention for interrogation extended by another 14 days and to allow them to meet their families and a lawyer. Jan. 8, 2018: Home Affairs Minister Lt-Gen Kyaw Swe approves an order to prosecute the journalists under Article 3 (1) ( c ) of the Official Secrets Act. The article says: "If any person for any purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the State…obtains, collects, records or publishes or communicates to any other person any secret official code or password, or any sketch, plan, model, article or note or other document or information which is calculated to be or might be or is intended to be, directly or indirectly, useful to an enemy; he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend, where the offence is committed in relation to any work of defense, arsenal, naval, military or air force establishment or station, mine, minefield, factory, dockyard, camp, ship or aircraft or otherwise in relation to the naval, military or air force affairs of [the State] or in relation to any secret official code, to fourteen years and in other cases to three years." Jan. 10, 2018: Prosecutors ask the court that Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo be charged under the Official Secrets Act. Jan. 23, 2018: Lt-Col Yu Naing tells the court that Capt. Moe Yan Naing and Sgt. Khin Maung Lin were not detained in his district. Feb. 6, 2018: A prosecution witness who was part of the police team that arrested the journalists, 2nd Lt. Tin Htwe Oo, tells the court that he had burned the notes he made at the time but offers no explanation as to why. Feb. 14, 2018: Another prosecution witness who was also part of the arrest team, 2nd Lt. Myo Ko Ko, tells the court he was not familiar with police procedures for recording arrests. When asked where the arrests took place, he says it was on a street lined with factories. His answer contradicts a map, previously produced by police and submitted to the court, that shows stores and tea shops but no factories. March 28, 2018: Defense lawyer U Khin Maung Zaw submits a request to have the case dismissed on grounds of insufficient evidence. Apr. 11, 2018: Judge Ye Lwin rejects the defense's request to have the case dismissed, stating that there is "a proper reason" for the accusations against the two reporters and that "they should not be released." Apr. 20, 2018: As a prosecution witness, Capt. Moe Yan Naing tells the court that police Brig-Gen Tin Ko Ko ordered officers to "trap" the Reuters reporters arrested in December, instructing them to meet the journalists at a restaurant and give them "secret documents." Apr. 23, 2018: The Myanmar National Human Rights Commission sends the Ministry of Home Affairs a letter urging it to ensure that Capt. Moe Yan Naing's rights are not violated. Jul. 9, 2018: Yangon district judge U Ye Lwin charges Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo with breaching the colonial-era Official Secrets Act. Both journalists plead “not guilty” to the charges, telling the judge they “followed journalistic ethics”. Jul. 16-24, 2018: Both Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo testify about their arrest and police interrogations. Aug. 20, 2018: Yangon district judge U Ye Lwin announces he will deliver his verdict on Aug. 27. Aug. 27, 2018: The verdict is postponed to Sep. 3 due to the judge's ill health. Sept. 3, 2018: Both Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo were sentenced to seven years' imprisonment for breaching the Official Secrets Act. Their lawyer said they will apply to the upper court for appeal. The post Reuters Case Timeline appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Seasonal Illness Claims Four Young Lives in Naga Zone Posted: 03 Sep 2018 03:19 AM PDT CHIANG MAI, Thailand — Four children, in the village of Lan Pan near Don Hee town in Nanyun Township of Sagaing Region's Naga Self-Administered Zone, have died of seasonal flu in the past week, with at least four other villages also suffering from a wave of the seasonal illness for the past two weeks. Four children aged between one month and 10 years old died of acute cases of influenza on Aug. 25, 26 and 28, and Sept. 2, according to Sing Maung Yawngva, the Sagaing regional lawmaker for Nanyun Township. “Even though it is regarded as seasonal flu, the malnutrition of the children causes them to be too weak to fight against the illness and thus subsequently leads to loss of life,” explained the lawmaker. Almost all of the villagers are suffering from seasonal illnesses, with 357 out of the total 425 villagers currently sick with the flu, he added, after visiting villagers of Lan Pan, some 80 miles away from Nanyun Township. A one-and-a-half-year-old girl died on Sunday. She was brought back from Lahe Township hospital after a day, as the hospital could not help her, he told The Irrawaddy on Monday. The Naga Self-Administered Zone Office released a statement on Thursday, Aug. 30, saying that treatments and necessary medicines are being provided to the villagers of Wan Yote Village near Don Hee from where information about the illness was first received on Aug. 20. It said treatments have been given to the villagers suffering from sicknesses and there should be no more concern in Wan Yote. However, no information has yet been released about the village of Lam Pan. The regional government and civil society groups such as the Eastern Naga Development Organization have rushed to provide medicine and healthcare support to the villagers. Lam Pan and Wan Yote villages are about 10 miles apart and do not yet have telecommunication accessibility. Road access to those villages near Don Hee is very difficult and it takes at least three hours to drive on motorbike from the town of Don Hee to Lan Pan, locals told The Irrawaddy. U Lautu, a resident of the town of Don Hee said that as the town has a hospital with healthcare staff and both civilian and military physicians, the residents are generally free from such health threats. As well as the lack of access to healthcare, transport and communication in these remote villages, the regional lawmaker said, unhealthy lifestyles and a lack of knowledge on hygiene contribute to making the illness worse. On Monday, Sing Mawng Yawngva said the villagers in Wan Yote, Lam Pan and Ha Houng villages are recovering from their illnesses but healthcare provisions will still be needed for at least a week or so. "We need to wait and see, only when healthcare experts confirm the situation and we can be sure the disease is under control," the lawmaker said. Two years ago, 80 children in the Naga region reportedly died from a measles outbreak, however, the official figure on the death toll was only 41. The post Seasonal Illness Claims Four Young Lives in Naga Zone appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Embassies and Rights Groups Denounce Reuters Convictions Posted: 03 Sep 2018 03:10 AM PDT YANGON — International embassies and rights groups denounced the convictions of two Reuters journalists as "devastating" and "deeply troubling" while calling the government to immediately release the journalists and review the case. Yangon's Northern District Court on Monday sentenced Ko Wa Lone and Ko Kyaw Soe Oo to seven years in prison for breaching the Official Secrets Act. In a statement released on the same day, the US Embassy said "the conviction of journalists Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo under the Official Secrets Act is deeply troubling for all who support press freedom and the transition toward democracy in Myanmar." The two reporters were arrested in December last year for possessing important and secret government documents relating to Rakhine State and security forces. At the time of the arrest, the pair was investigating the killing of Rohingya villagers. Despite the government's accusation of violating the Official Secrets Act, a prosecution witness, Capt. Moe Yan Naing told the court that a police brigadier-general ordered officers to "trap" the Reuters reporters arrested in December, instructing them to meet the journalists at a restaurant and give them "secret documents." The US embassy said the clear flaws in the case raise serious concerns about rule of law and judicial independence in Myanmar, and the reporters' conviction is a major setback to the government of Myanmar’s stated goal of expanding democratic freedoms. "We urge the Government of Myanmar to release Wa Lone and Kyaw So Oo immediately, and to end the arbitrary prosecution of journalists doing their jobs," said the statement. Dan Chugg, the British Ambassador to Myanmar, said on behalf of the British Government and EU member states that they were extremely disappointed with the verdict and sentencing and called the journalists' immediate releases. "We have attended the trial throughout and we believe that the judge has ignored the evidence presented to him as well as ruling against Myanmar's own laws. This is a bad day for Myanmar and we call for the journalists to be released immediately." The European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy said the conviction "undermines the freedom of the media, the public’s right to information and the development of the rule of law in Myanmar." The representative Federica Mogherini said in a statement that the European Union and EU Member State diplomats were among the many international observers present at every court hearing since the journalists’ arrest on Dec. 12, 2017, and they have continuously raised the matter with the Myanmar government. "We therefore reiterate our expectation that the authorities ensure adequate conditions for journalists to carry out their work. The prison sentences of Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo should be reviewed and the two journalists be released immediately and unconditionally," said the statement. The Embassy of Denmark said the sentencing day was a "dark day for press freedom and rule of law in Myanmar" and called on the government of Myanmar to "undo this injustice, release Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo immediately and launch an investigation into allegations that they were set up by Myanmar's Police Force." "This is a tragedy for them and an injustice carried out under a government, which came to office based on a strong commitment to rule of law. What we have seen today is not rule of law," said the statement. Meanwhile, rights groups like Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International called the convictions "politically motivated" and HRW urged the government to immediately quash the verdict and release Wa Lone and Kyaw Soe Oo. Amnesty International said the politically-motivated decision has significant ramifications for press freedom in Myanmar. "It sends a stark warning to other journalists in the country of the severe consequences that await should they look too closely at military abuses. This amounts to censorship through fear." The post Embassies and Rights Groups Denounce Reuters Convictions appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Two NLD Lawmakers Dismissed from Executive Committee Posted: 03 Sep 2018 02:30 AM PDT YANGON — Two outspoken lawmakers of the ruling National League for Democracy (NLD) were purged from the executive committee of their concerned party township chapter. The decision was made during a central executive committee meeting of the party on Aug. 25. The two – Yangon regional lawmaker U Kyaw Zeya representing Dagon Township (2) and Upper House lawmaker Daw Thet Thet Khine representing Dagon Township – however, remain party members. "Any party member has the right to disagree but they are not allowed to deviate from the policies and guidelines adopted by the party," NLD spokesperson Dr. Myo Nyunt told The Irrawaddy. "The two have faults in this regard and were disciplined accordingly," he added. The two lawmakers have been critical of the NLD-led government, which has garnered popularity with some voters. In an interview with a local media agency in the second week of the August, Daw Thet Thet Khine voiced criticism of the government's economic policy while speaking about the weakening kyat-dollar exchange rate and country's declining exports. The interview went viral on the social media and was shared by hundreds of thousands of netizens. "I only want to work for the country. I will continue working in whatever capacity I am allowed," Daw Thet Thet Khine told The Irrawaddy. Dr. Myo Nyunt said that party leaders had verbally warned Daw Thet Thet Khine several times regarding her criticism of government policies. "I have no comment. I was not warned in advance. They should have told me if I was doing something wrong," said U Kyaw Zeya, who has been vocal in his criticism of the Yangon regional government's urban planning. Daw Thet Thet Khaing is a member of the Lower House's Banks and Monetary Development Committee and U Kyaw Zeya is on the economic committee of the Yangon regional parliament. "We have had numerous reports about their actions [deemed to violate party policies]. We waited to see if they would change but they didn't so we terminated their duties," said Dr. Myo Nyunt. Translated from Burmese by Thet Ko Ko. The post Two NLD Lawmakers Dismissed from Executive Committee appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Japan Braces for Likely Landfall from Strong Typhoon Jebi Posted: 02 Sep 2018 09:29 PM PDT TOKYO — Japan braced on Monday for the arrival of strong typhoon Jebi as the storm churned north towards the islands, the latest in a series of harsh weather events to strike Japan this summer, meteorologists said. Jebi – which means “swallow” in Korean – strengthened to super-typhoon status last week but weakened as it moved north and will likely be a Category 2 or 1 typhoon when it hits Japan on Tuesday, probably near the second-largest city of Osaka in western Japan. Parts of western Japan are likely to see up to 300 mm (11 inches) of rain in the 24 hours to Tuesday morning, the Japanese Meteorological Agency said, with wind gusts of up to 216 km/h (134 mph) once the storm makes landfall. Jebi’s predicted course could bring it close to parts of western Japan hit by deadly rains and flooding that killed more than 200 people in July. However, it is set to speed up once it makes landfall, minimizing the amount of rain that will fall in one place. Japan has been hit by extreme weather since the beginning of July that included record-breaking heat as well as devastating floods and landslides. Typhoon Cimaron sliced across western Japan less than two weeks ago, dumping heavy rain before heading out to sea. The post Japan Braces for Likely Landfall from Strong Typhoon Jebi appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| As India Adds 100 Smart Cities, One Tells a Cautionary Tale Posted: 02 Sep 2018 09:22 PM PDT LAVASA, India — When David Cooper and his wife were looking for somewhere to retire, they wanted a place by a river or a lake, away from Mumbai’s congested streets, worsening pollution and vanishing green spaces. They did not have to go far: they bought a two-bedroom flat in a complex for senior citizens in Lavasa, a private city that was being built in the hills a four-hour drive away, and touted as India’s first Smart City. But their retirement dream quickly took a turn for the worse as Lavasa’s developer, after battling for environmental clearances and surviving a yearlong shutdown, ran out of cash. “When we moved in, it was absolutely pristine. The roads were like race tracks, we could drink water out of the tap, there were no power outages, and we felt absolutely secure,” said Cooper in a cafe in Lavasa. “Now, there is litter everywhere, buildings are half done, roads are potholed, and there are break-ins because few security staff are left. Our dream has turned into something else,” he said. With rapid urbanization, governments across the world are making cities “smarter” by using data and digital technology in security, healthcare, energy, mobility, water and waste management for more efficiency, sustainability and livability. Nowhere is this more urgently needed than in India, which is forecast to overtake China by 2022 as the world’s most populous country, according to United Nations data. But Lavasa’s abandoned buildings and cratered roads are a far cry from the blueprints for a city modeled after the colorful Italian seaside town of Portofino, with facilities for about 250,000 people to live, learn, work and play in. In its decline, Lavasa serves as a cautionary tale for India’s $7.5 billion plan to turn 100 urban centers into Smart Cities by 2020, with high-speed internet and modern transportation systems, analysts say. The federal program does not address structural issues such as poor design, and ignores the needs of low-income and marginalized groups, according to planners and rights groups. “Without fixed targets and no clear-cut delivery or assessment plan, there is a lot of confusion over what makes a city ‘smart’,” said Saswat Bandyopadhyay, a professor at CEPT University in Ahmedabad, who teaches a course on smart cities. “A city can install 1,000 CCTV cameras or 100 solar-powered street lights and call itself smart. But that is not it,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation. Satellite Cities The UN forecasts the world’s urban population to grow to 70 percent by 2050 from 55 percent now. India will add about 300 million people to its urban centers over the next 20 years, and requires investment of $1.2 trillion to handle this transformation, according to consultancy McKinsey. “Planned urbanization is required rather than the ad-hoc, unplanned urbanization that we have seen so far,” said Shirish Sankhe, a McKinsey senior partner in India. “The Smart Cities Mission is good and necessary, but we need it in addition to other efforts to improve urban centers.” As areas are upgraded in each city, they create “islands of excellence” that need to be scaled up extensively so everyone can benefit, he said. One solution is to build at least 25 new satellite cities for up to 1 million people each, near the country’s biggest urban centers, Sankhe said. They would benefit from proximity to the large cities, as well as careful planning, he said. But from ancient Constantinople to Myanmar’s Naypyitaw, there are few examples of successful purpose-built cities. India’s western state of Gujarat alone had planned 24 new smart cities before the federal plan was launched in 2015. Few of these have materialized, however. Amaravati, India’s first greenfield capital in decades, has been hailed as a model planned city. But it is well behind schedule, and criticized for ignoring protests of displaced farmers, and the ecological impact of building on farmland close to the river. “Purpose-built cities are often just glorified gated communities. A city must grow organically, with a mix of people and purposes,” said Raj Cherubal, chief executive officer of Chennai Smart City, which oversees the upgrade of the southern city. “Smart Cities are not just about technology; they’re about a better quality of life. And a better quality of life should not be for just a small section of people,” he said. Limited Focus But most cities in India’s Smart Cities Mission are only upgrading small areas totaling an average of less than 5 percent of the city’s total area, according to advocacy group Housing and Land Rights Network (HLRN) in New Delhi. That will impact less than a quarter of India’s urban population of about 400 million people, said Shivani Chaudhry, HLRN’s executive director. “It is a restrictive approach to urban development, with a limited focus on marginalized groups including indigenous people, women and other minorities,” she said. Focusing on technology may widen inequality, while the upgrades raise the risk of gentrification and evictions, she said. Evictions of slum dwellers have already been seen in about a third of the planned smart cities, she said. Rahul Kapoor, director of the Smart Cities Mission, said that the program combines integrated planning and implementation of urban renewal initiatives aimed at citywide benefits. The result will be inclusive cities that provide “a decent quality of life to every city dweller irrespective of their economic status, background, gender, age or disabilities," he said. In Lavasa, the other risk of greenfield cities is apparent: housing just a fraction of its intended population, its formerly posh clubhouse and convention center look decrepit, and its technology and infrastructure are visibly crumbling. A spokesman for Lavasa Corporation, a unit of Hindustan Construction Co., did not respond to emails seeking comment. “Building a city from scratch is tough. It needs time to grow,” said Jimmy Shaw, who runs several restaurants and a hotel in Lavasa. “Those of us who have homes here, we still love it. Though it’s hard to watch our dream city deteriorate,” he said. For the hundreds of villagers who gave up their land for the city, their very livelihoods are at stake. Many were resettled in pucca, or permanent homes, and found jobs in the newly built houses and businesses. Their children joined the free English-language school run by the developer. But with funding drying up, the school’s future is uncertain, and those who work as security guards – like Satish Pasalkar, a former farmer – have not been paid in months. “When Lavasa came, our lives improved – we had new opportunities and the option of a different future,” he said. “We can only do well if this city thrives.” The post As India Adds 100 Smart Cities, One Tells a Cautionary Tale appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| Myanmar-Thailand Highway Branded ‘Ecological and Social Disaster’ Posted: 02 Sep 2018 09:17 PM PDT PHNOM PENH — Community and conservation groups in Myanmar have branded a planned highway linking a port project to Thailand an “ecological and social disaster," saying it would uproot indigenous people from their homes and farms. Critics said an environmental and social impact assessment for the road project, approved by the Myanmar government in June, failed to adequately specify compensation for loss of land and livelihoods, among other problems. “This is a road to an ecological and social disaster (in Myanmar),” said Christy Williams, Myanmar director for the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF), an international conservation group. The highway is considered strategically important to both nations as it would link Thailand to a deep-sea port and planned Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Dawei, a town on the Myanmar side of an isthmus divided between the two countries. The industrial complex would serve as a gateway to Southeast Asia’s markets, with goods trucked between Dawei and Thailand, avoiding the need for ships to sail southward through the Malacca Straights, the world’s busiest shipping lane. But Williams said the planned road would pass through a region of “huge ecological importance with rich biodiversity." The assessment looked only at the effects on people and the environment within 500m (550 yards) of the road, he added, but the impact will affect a much wider area. He said WWF had been working with communities and provided “extensive recommendations and solutions” to the Myanmar government and Myandawei Industrial Estate Co. Ltd, the Thai firm developing the road and SEZ, but these had “been ignored." The impact assessment failed to address many issues brought forward by residents during consultation sessions, said Thant Zin, director of the Dawei Development Association, a local civil society group. “Our main concerns over the project are forced relocation of thousands of local indigenous people, potential industrial pollution … land grabbing and livelihood issues, and human rights violations in project area,” he said. A spokesman for Myanmar’s environment ministry did not respond to repeated requests for comment. Gunn Bunchandranon, a spokesman for Myandawei Industrial Estate Co. Ltd, said the highway’s impact assessment was in line with the laws of both Myanmar and Thai. He said people from affected communities who attended public consultations did not raise any concerns about compensation for loss of land. However, a 2015 draft of the impact assessment provided by conservation group EarthRights International included the minutes of one such meeting where the land compensation question was raised. Risk of Conflict Myanmar residents have also expressed fear that the highway could reignite conflict between the government and Myanmar’s oldest armed group, the Karen National Union (KNU), according to Ben Hardman of EarthRights International. Those concerns did not make it into the impact assessment, Hardman said. The KNU signed a ceasefire agreement with the military in 2012, ending six decades of fighting. In 2015 it signed a national ceasefire agreement (NCA), along with other armed ethnic groups. But relations with the government remain tense and the KNU claims control over territory the highway would pass through. Saw Tah Doh Moo, the group’s secretary general, said the NCA required that the KNU be consulted about any development projects in areas under its control. However, neither the company nor the government have officially discussed the road project with them, he said. “I don’t want to say what would happen, but it would undermine the NCA,” he told the Thomson Reuters Foundation by phone. “We have to think about how to respond.” The post Myanmar-Thailand Highway Branded 'Ecological and Social Disaster' appeared first on The Irrawaddy. |
| You are subscribed to email updates from The Irrawaddy. To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
| Google, 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States | |
