Monday, August 7, 2017

The Irrawaddy Magazine

The Irrawaddy Magazine


Human Rights Commission Inspects Shan State Prisons

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 08:38 AM PDT

YANGON — Members of the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission (MNHRC) arrived in northern Shan State to carry out an inspection of jail cells in police stations and courts in Lashio and Hsipaw, as part of countrywide prison reforms in Myanmar.

During their five-day trip, the inspection group, led by the MNHRC's U Yu Lwin Aung, is scheduled to meet with three journalists detained in Hsipaw after being charged with violating Article 17(1) of the colonial-era Unlawful Associations Act for having contact with the ethnic armed group the Ta'ang National Liberation Army (TNLA).

On August 4, the Hsipaw Township court judge rejected the journalists' appeal for bail, saying he did not have enough details about the case to make a judgment.

The military arrested seven people in total—The Irrawaddy's Lawi Weng, also known as U Thein Zaw, as well as U Aye Nai and U Pyae Bone Naing from the Democratic Voice of Burma—on June 26 in Namhsan on their way back from covering a drug-burning ceremony in TNLA territory.

"We inspected 14 prisons already. The special report of the Commission, which includes the findings of the inspections and recommendations, will be submitted to the government," U Yu Lwin Aung said.

The MNHRC investigation aims to ensure human rights law is not violated in Myanmar's prisons and that the UN's standard minimum rules are met concerning the treatment of prisoners.

There are 46 prisons in Myanmar in total. The prison population—including pre-trial detainees and those remanded during their hearings—was 74,000 as of Dec. 2016, according to the Ministry of Home Affairs.

On July 14, the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners met with the MNHRC and discussed options for prison reform.

The post Human Rights Commission Inspects Shan State Prisons appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Elephant Killed by Poisoned Bolt in Irrawaddy Region

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 06:27 AM PDT

PATHEIN, Irrawaddy Region — A wild elephant was hunted and killed with a poisoned bolt—an arrow shot from a crossbow—in the village tract of Tin Chaung in Irrawaddy Region's Ngapudaw Township.

Following a report from locals, a combined team from the Forestry Department, Livestock Breeding and Veterinary Department, police, forestry police and administrative authorities searched the forest and found the dying elephant near the village of Yawn Yin on Friday.

"After it was reported, we searched for and found the poisoned elephant. It had not died yet and the poachers were likely waiting for it to die. We had to flee at one point when it tried to attack but it died later in the evening," head of Ngapudaw Township Forestry Department U Tin Soe told The Irrawaddy.

The black female elephant was 26 years old, 7.6 feet long, 15 feet in circumference, and its trunk was 4.8 feet long. A 16-inch poisoned bolt was found in its shoulder.

Nine elephants have been killed by poachers in Irrawaddy Region as of January, all by poisoned bolts, according to the Irrawaddy Region Police Force.

Forest reserves in Pathein, Ngapudaw and Thabaung townships in Pathein District are home to wild elephants.

Poachers take the tusks, hide, flesh, and tails from hunted elephants and sell them to smugglers along the Pathein-Mawtin road. From there, smugglers take the items via the Pathein-Monywa road to Mandalay Region, where they smuggle them into China via the Mandalay-Muse road.

The majority of the elephant poachers have been from Minbu, Ngape, and Sidoktaya townships in Magwe Region, according to the Irrawaddy Region Police Force.

"We've opened a case at the police station, and we are working to find the poachers," said U Tin Soe.

Locals have suggested conducting routine security patrols around the forest and installing inspection gates along the route to prevent poaching.

Last year, poachers killed 13 wild elephants in the region and police arrested hunters in four of the cases. They are still investigating six cases and closed three cases, as they could not identify the poachers.

Translated from Burmese by Thet Ko Ko

The post Elephant Killed by Poisoned Bolt in Irrawaddy Region appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Daw Aung Sang Suu Kyi Touts Peace Efforts in Visit to Myanmar Heartland

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 06:21 AM PDT

MYAETINEKAN, Mandalay Region — Myanmar leader Daw Aung San Suu Kyi told villagers at the heart of the country on Monday that talks with ethnic rebels must be a priority, after putting peace negotiations ahead of economic reforms in her first months in power.

Suu Kyi inherited the long-running ethnic conflicts when she came to power last year amid a transition from decades of military rule that wrecked rural economies.

The Nobel laureate has come under criticism for putting the complicated talks with myriad armed groups—expected to last years and unlikely to bring tangible results soon—over the economy which has suffered from a drop in foreign investment.

She has hosted two rounds of talks with rebel leaders in the capital Naypyitaw, but significant progress has been elusive.

"I want all my citizens to consider that the peace process is a matter for everybody… We can maintain development only when we get peace," Suu Kyi told a crowd of hundreds in Myaetinekan village, Mandalay Region.

"We don't have peace in our country because there is no mutual trust, love and [there is] conflict among our citizens or ethnicities."

Local and international media were invited by the government to follow Suu Kyi's visit and watch the event dubbed a "peace talk," the third such exchange with villagers she has held. The event was simultaneously broadcast on state television.

Suu Kyi declined several opportunities to answer reporters' questions.

"Our national priority is peace," Mandalay Region chief minister Zaw Myint Maung told Reuters. "It's a peace talk… The context is peace, and then development."

Those who had the opportunity, however, asked Suu Kyi about agricultural concerns like irrigation and the recent electrification of some parts of the village, which had left out some villagers.

Aung Tint, 64, told Reuters he supported Suu Kyi's decision to prioritize peace, but said life had changed little in the 16 months since Suu Kyi took office.

"To tell frankly, we are farmers," he said. "She can't do anything for us so far, because the crop prices are not good."

Suu Kyi passed off specific questions to senior officials also in attendance. Zaw Myint Maung said Myaetinekan was chosen for the visit because it lies approximately at the geographical center of Myanmar and was a typical Myanmar village.

Most residents are rice farmers and belong to the country's ethnic Bamar Buddhist majority.

Suu Kyi's party won handsomely here and elsewhere in the Bamar heartland in the 2015 elections that propelled her to power.

On a short tour of the village, she viewed a Japanese-made transformer that was installed in March to connect the village to the national power grid for the first time.

At weaving factories with machines running off the power, Suu Kyi joked with villagers who offered her homemade snacks and, in one instance, bowed at her feet.

The post Daw Aung Sang Suu Kyi Touts Peace Efforts in Visit to Myanmar Heartland appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Getting it Right: A Response to ‘Death, Lies and Videotape’

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 05:19 AM PDT

In a July 24 post on Tea Circle, "Death, Lies and Videotape," David Scott Mathieson aptly notes the dangers of "misreporting and over-dramatization of events" in Myanmar through the circulation of unauthenticated, "unfiltered information." As a human rights organization, we know these perils all too well and the importance of "getting it right."

Credibility is the bedrock of human rights documentation work and the dissemination of inaccurate information not only distracts from the most severe violations, but can also impugn human rights organizations publishing reliable and accurate information. As eloquently put by Mr. Mathieson, "Disinformation plays into the hands of government deniers and conflict actors wanting to divert blame."

Ironically, while cautioning against the dangers of "fake news," Mr. Mathieson got it wrong when he pointed to graphic video footage disseminated by Fortify Rights in his attempt to demonstrate "the perils of unfiltered information on social media."

The footage in question shows Myanmar Army soldiers beating, punching, and kicking civilians in northern Shan State. A short film we produced about it went viral, and within four days, the office of Myanmar State Counselor Aung San Suu Kyi and the Office of the Commander-in-Chief of the Myanmar military—the very institution implicated in the footage—issued statements agreeing to investigate the incident.

In making his argument, Mr. Mathieson not only missed the point that this case represented a positive use of film, but also misrepresented key facts. Firstly, he writes that "[r]ights groups quoted in The New York Times claimed the footage was taken in recent days or weeks, yet it was determined subsequently to be two years old, pointing to the perils of premature social media posting of conflict reports."

The referenced New York Times article only quoted Fortify Rights, and nowhere in the article or elsewhere did we claim that the footage was filmed "in recent days and weeks." On the contrary, we explicitly stated in our film that "details of this footage are still emerging." We told The New York Times and other news outlets that we believed the footage was likely filmed during the recent ongoing armed-conflict in Northern Shan State, which is true.

But regardless of whether the footage was filmed two days ago or two years ago, the actions of the soldiers are no less wrong and demand no less than an immediate investigation and prompt accountability. That was the point.

While Mr. Mathieson argues on the one-hand that the footage was outdated, he confusingly goes on to suggest it was publicized "prematurely" and in service to "the rapid-fire demands of Facebook and Twitter."

This footage is sadly not "fake news" or an example of "stovepiping"— a term Mr. Mathieson describes as "the elevation of primary reports to prominence without the necessary verification and contextualizing." Before taking the tact of the Myanmar government and dismissing credible reports of human rights violations simply by labeling them "fake news," it is advisable— as Mr. Mathieson suggests— to subject all reports of abuse to rigorous analysis.

And that is exactly what we did.

The team at Fortify Rights— including the two present authors, two Myanmar human rights specialists, a multimedia specialist, and our legal director— watched the 17-minute-long footage dozens of times, analyzed it at various speeds, translated the audio, and consulted with our civil society partners in northern Shan State.

We established a few facts right from the start. We established that more than two-dozen Myanmar Army soldiers and at least four militiamen appear in the video, menacing more than 18 men and one woman in civilian clothes. We established that the six victims bound and beaten by soldiers in the film were Ta'ang— an ethnic minority group predominantly from Myanmar's northern Shan State. Importantly, we also established that the incident likely occurred in Kutkai Township, Shan State.

We counted 32 kicks, four punches and slaps, and three violent blows with a helmet, delivered by Myanmar Army soldiers to three of the unarmed, bound men, while they were being questioned. Two victims bled from their faces and mouths. Insignia patches visible on the right shoulders of the perpetrators indicated that they were with Light Infantry Division (LID) 88.

We published these important facts in a news release on May 28, less than 24-hours after we published the 86-second film on the incident, calling upon Myanmar authorities to investigate.

The film not only prompted a rare and almost-immediate response from the government and the military, it also prompted journalists to dig deeper into the incident, exposing new facts. For example, three days after we disseminated the film, now-jailed The Irrawaddy reporter Lawi Weng helped confirm that the incident occurred in June 2015. We also received welcomed news that the Myanmar Army released four of the men featured in the film after detaining them for several months.

Far from an example of misreporting or exaggeration, this case demonstrates the responsible use of video and film to establish the facts, promote and protect human rights, and prompt government action.

Mr. Mathieson's article also references the situation in Rakhine State with regard to "fake news" and "fabricated video." He correctly acknowledges "harrowing reports of widespread abuses" against Rohingya Muslims by the Myanmar Army and that the Myanmar authorities use inaccurate media "as a shield […] to reject reports of abuses" against Rohingya.

Since 2012, a variety of actors have disseminated online photos and videos originating from other countries while alleging—or rather, assuming—that they represent evidence of human rights violations by the Myanmar Army against Rohingya men, women, and children in Rakhine State.

On this issue, Mr. Mathieson shares a common misunderstanding regarding the situation in Rakhine State when he says that "[m]uch of the fabricated video and photos are desperate measures to raise awareness and compel greater pressure for intervention in the international community." Here he suggests "Rohingya activists and their allies" deliberately disseminate "fabricated video and photos."

In our experience working with Rohingya human rights defenders as well as conducting in-depth interviews on the ground with hundreds of Rohingya survivors in Rakhine State and on the Myanmar-Bangladesh border, false information in this context is rarely shared deliberately or maliciously.

Rather, survivors of horrific and unspeakable atrocities often see graphic videos and footage depicting appalling events from other times or contexts that so closely represent their own experiences that they genuinely believe that it has evidentiary value. They circulate these photos and videos because they want the world to know what the Myanmar Army did to them. They want accountability.

No good can come from blaming Rohingya for circulating unverified or "false" images and videos without probing deeper as to why and how false information spreads. It's not as simple as it seems.

Let us be clear: there is no excuse for the deliberate dissemination of false media. However, as BBC correspondent Jonah Fisher and others have noted, there are far-more photos and videos coming out of Rakhine State that are disturbingly real rather than "fake," thanks in large part to the hard work of Rohingya human rights defenders.

It's time to get it right and use all the tools at our disposal to end human rights violations, including film and social media platforms.

Matthew Smith is CEO of Fortify Rights and Amy Smith is Executive Director of Fortify Rights. This article originally appeared in Tea Circle, a forum hosted at Oxford University for emerging research and perspectives on Burma/Myanmar.

The post Getting it Right: A Response to 'Death, Lies and Videotape' appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Plaintiff in Myanmar Now Lawsuit Arrested at Trial

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 05:03 AM PDT

MANDALAY — The plaintiff in a lawsuit against an esteemed investigative journalist was arrested when he arrived at the journalist's trial in Maha Aung Myay Township Court, Mandalay on Monday.

U Kyaw Myo Shwe was detained for participating in an anti-government protest of nationalist monks and laypersons in Mandalay on Friday. He will appear at Chanmyathazi Township Court under a charge of incitement, according to police.

In March, U Kyaw Myo Shwe filed a lawsuit against Myanmar Now chief editor U Ko Swe Win under controversial Article 66(d) of Burma's Telecommunications Law, accusing the reporter of insulting ultranationalist monk U Wirathu in a Facebook post.

U Kyaw Myo Shwe was late by a few hours to the court hearing of Ko Swe Win on Monday. When he arrived, the defendant's lawyer asked the court to call off the trial, as the plaintiff, who was included on an arrest warrant on Friday, was a fugitive.

"We could not accept that the fugitive showed up to the court freely. We are not trying to stop his right to be the plaintiff, but we have to question the judicial system and the police for not taking action against the fugitive," said U Khin Maung Myint, the legal adviser of Ko Swe Win.

Ko Kyaw Myo Shwe had remained at home since the announce of his arrest warrant, according to his lawyer, causing the defense of Ko Swe Win to question why the police had failed to take action sooner.

The next court session in the trial of Ko Swe Win was set for August 21. Ko Kyaw Myo Shwe will testify from his detention in Mandalay's Obo Prison.

The post Plaintiff in Myanmar Now Lawsuit Arrested at Trial appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Myanmar Army Bars Military Dress for Mon Revolution Day

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 02:33 AM PDT

MOULMEIN, Mon State — The Myanmar Army has told the New Mon State Party (NMSP) not to hold military parades in uniform at locations other than the party's headquarters to mark the 70th Anniversary of Mon Revolution Day on Monday.

The 19th Military Operations Command in Ye Township summoned NMSP officials on Saturday in order to inform them about the instruction, said Nai Pin, liaison officer of the township's NMSP office, on Sunday.

The order means the NMSP will be barred from holding parades in Dawei, Thaton, and Moulmein, as well as the area of the Three Pagodas Pass.

The day marks the occasion when about 30 Mon leaders stole guns from a police station in Sarthapyin village, Kyaikmayaw Township, on the full moon day of Wagaung in 1948, forming a resistance against the government.

The NMSP signed a ceasefire with the then ruling State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC) in 1995, but the truce broke in 2010. It then signed state- and Union-level ceasefire agreements with former President U Thein Sein's government in February 2012, but has opted out of signing the Nationwide Ceasefire Agreement (NCA).

According to Nai Pin, the ban shows the National League for Democracy (NLD) government is pressuring the NMSP to sign the NCA.

Mon people will mark the annual event as usual, laying wreaths at the tombs of Mon leaders in the leaders' villages and gathering at the Mon Martyrs' Mausoleum in Mudon Township.

"We'll pay tribute to leaders in the morning and gather at the mausoleum at 1 p.m.," said Mi Sandar Nom of the event's organizing committee.

The NMSP was allowed to stage military parades in uniform under the previous government, she said, adding that it was "unacceptable" that it is now banned under the current government.

The NMSP was also told by the Myanmar Army not to hold a military parade in military dress on Mon National Day in February this year, resulting in tensions between the two sides.

NMSP officials based in Moulmein told The Irrawaddy they had received the instruction from the Myanmar Army 1st grade tactical commander of the command, but had not yet received an official letter. They declined to give further comment.

Translated from Burmese by Thet Ko Ko.

The post Myanmar Army Bars Military Dress for Mon Revolution Day appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Govt Thanks Citizens for Not Supporting Nationalist Protests

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 02:23 AM PDT

YANGON — The government on Sunday thanked Myanmar citizens for their stance against anti-government nationalist protesters, including monks, who staged sit-ins at religious sites in Yangon and Mandalay as well as in Taunggyi in Shan State last week.

A statement titled "Thank You Message to the People" released by the office of the State Counselor Daw Aung San Suu Kyi on Sunday said: "People have not supported or participated in the demonstrations … We express heartfelt thanks to the people for their stance and conviction that serve the long-term interest of the State."

Protesters camped near the Shwedagon Pagoda in Yangon and the Maha Muni Pagoda in Mandalay last week called for the National League for Democracy (NLD)-led government to step down as it had failed to protect the country's race and religion.

Hundreds of nationalist monks and laypersons gathered in Yangon and Mandalay from Wednesday last week while 10 protesting monks joined the Taunggyi camp on Friday.

Rather than attracting support, the protesters' calls earned public condemnation for inflaming nationalism and anti-Muslim sentiment and threatening to derail the government's reform process in the country.

The number of protesters in Mandalay and Yangon quickly dwindled to little more than a dozen at each site.

Following the government's crackdown on a camp in Mandalay early morning on Saturday, protesters in Yangon and Taunggyi also shut down their camps.

The post Govt Thanks Citizens for Not Supporting Nationalist Protests appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

The Women of 1988

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 02:05 AM PDT

Of all the social and political upheavals that Myanmar has experienced since 1962, the popular uprising of 1988 is seen by many as the most prominent in the country's modern history. Over a period of six months—reaching a peak on the auspicious day of August 8, 1988—people across Myanmar took to the streets to defy the dictatorship that had oppressed them for 26 years.

Despite an end to the struggle in a bloody military coup, young people kept the spirit of the '88 pro-democracy movement alive—in prisons, in exile, and on borders— by defying the regime using whatever means possible. It is believed that their efforts, power and commitment made way for the elected National League for Democracy (NLD) government today.

When Myanmar marks the 29th anniversary of the uprising on Tuesday, we will honor those who dared to sacrifice their lives for the good of the country and their fellow citizens. In commemoration, The Irrawaddy chose to profile seven women who were involved in or inspired by the events of 1988, so as to represent the many more who fought alongside their male counterparts at the forefront of the democracy movement. Most of those featured below continue to be politically active in different sectors, fighting against injustice or serving people in need, and fulfilling legacies 29 years in the making.

 

Ma Win Maw Oo: The Martyr

When Myanmar Army soldiers indiscriminately opened fire on protesters on September 19, 1988 in downtown Yangon, Ma Win Maw Oo was at the forefront of the column. Witnesses recalled that despite her bullet wounds, the high school student did not drop the picture she held of Gen Aung San until she fell to the ground. Later, her blood-soaked body was carried away by two doctors for emergency treatment, captured in an iconic photograph taken by a foreign journalist. The picture appeared in the Oct. 3, 1988 issue of Newsweek's Asia edition, and 16-year-old Ma Win Maw Oo soon became an icon of the brutality of the crackdown, which cost her her life.

Apart from her sacrifice, Ma Win Maw Oo's last words reflected the unbowed spirit of the participants of the '88 uprising. In Myanmar, a deeply rooted traditional belief has it that a person's soul cannot rest in peace until his or her name is called out by the family so that the merit of the living can be shared with the deceased. Her final request was to her father, whom she told not to perform these last rites until her country had become a democracy.

Twenty-eight years later, in May 2016, one month after the Daw Aung San Suu Kyi-led democratically elected government came to power, the last Buddhist funerary rites for Ma Win Maw Oo were performed by her family, to put her wandering soul to rest. Despite her untimely death, she will be remembered along with the other young students who put their lives before the barrels of loaded guns when they took to the streets to defy the dictatorship 29 years ago.

– By Kyaw Phyo Tha

 

Ma Thandar: The Lawmaker

Twenty-nine years after she took the streets to protest against the authoritarian regime, Ma Thandar finds herself sitting in the Lower House of Parliament, making laws and participating in Myanmar's democratic transition.

In 1988, she was a leading student activist in Irrawaddy Division's Einme Township. After a bloody military coup on Sept. 18, 1988, a warrant was issued for her arrest because of her participation in demonstrations. Ma Thandar had to flee her home and go into hiding. Later, she joined the NLD.

In 2007, she was arrested for her pro-democracy work. She was tortured during interrogations and jailed for six years in Insein Prison.

The long-time activist co-founded the Democracy and Peace Women's Network with other female former political prisoners as a mechanism to fight for justice, women's rights and speak out against land grabs.

Three years ago, Ma Thandar lost her husband Aung Kyaw Naing, a journalist who wrote under the name Par Gyi and who had once served as Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's bodyguard. She was in Bangkok to receive a United Nations award for her work when she learned that he had been killed by the Myanmar Army during an interrogation.

Though two soldiers initially implicated in her husband's death were acquitted by a military tribunal, Ma Thandar's call for answers prompted the army to make an unprecedented statement admitting the journalist had been shot in custody.

Following the 2015 election, the 48-year-old became the representative for her home region, Irrawaddy's Einme Township, and a member of the Lower House's Citizens' Fundamental Rights Committee.

"We faced human rights violations and justice has never been done. But if we can protect the next generations from suffering as we did, I would see it as a success. That's what I want," she said.

– By San Yamin Aung

 

Hnin Pan Eain(center) pictured with her family. (Hnin Pan Eain/Facebook)

Hnin Pan Eain: The Supporter

It would have been unimaginably more difficult to survive in Myanmar's prisons under the military regime without the moral and physical support of people like Hnin Pan Eain.

Like many other family members of political prisoners who struggled to care for their jailed loved ones, she long supported her husband, Nay Oo, who was imprisoned for eight years for his role in Myanmar's pro-democracy movement of 1988.

Hnin Pan Eain's preparation for this role unknowingly began in 1969, when she was just three years old, and she first visited her father in jail. He was a journalist and peace activist who was arrested by Gen Ne Win's regime in 1966. It marked the first of hundreds of prison visits that she would make in her lifetime.

Between 1998 and 2005, the years during which her husband was jailed, she made more than 200 visits to the remote Kalay prison where he was held. The journey there was long and arduous, and allowed for just a 15-minute visitation period. She traveled 400 miles by train from Yangon to Mandalay with her five-year-old son. From there, they continued by bus for another 160 miles, through dense jungle to Kalay. Along the way, they had to cross the wild Chindwin River by boat.

After seeing her husband incarcerated in deplorable conditions, Hnin Pan Eain decided to stay in Kalay so that she would be able to make regular visits to the prison and bring him and others food, medicine and necessities every fortnight. She sold fish paste in the town market in order to survive.

She considered family visits a form of physical and mental sustenance for the political prisoners, who she saw as freedom fighters on the front line. In addition to visiting her own husband regularly, she helped family members of other political prisoners make trips to remote prisons.

In 1999, she transformed the hardship of her visits into a series of stories based on her experiences and those relayed to her by other prisoners. Originally called Daw Thandar, she wrote under a pen name—Hnin Pan Eain—under which she continues to be known.

Now a well-known 52-year-old writer, she continues helping former political prisoners and their families.

She has facilitated counseling for former political prisoners, their family members, and women in vocational schools, under the outreach programs of the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners, in order to heal the trauma, depression, and anxiety that haunts the past of so many who survived this era.

– By San Yamin Aung

Nan Khin Htwe Myint: The Legacy

In the same office building once run by her father, Dr. Saw Hla Tun, former head of the Karen State Council under the Anti-Fascist People's Freedom League (AFPFL), Nan Khin Htwe Myint serves as the Karen State chief minister under the NLD civilian government.

The 63-year-old has made many sacrifices due to her activism and family history of opposing military rule.

A participant in the political movement since an early age, she was detained for the first time in 1975 for taking part in the student movement. She continued to be imprisoned multiple times throughout the 1990s, including in Insein and Moulmein prisons.

She became a dedicated member of the NLD upon its formation in 1988, following the 1988 uprising. She contested and won a seat in the 1990 general election, in Hpa-an Constituency, the same constituency she represented in the 2015 general election.

Being the daughter of a politician, Nan Khin Htwe Myint fostered a homegrown knowledge of federalism, politics, and ethnic history, and fully committed herself to the movement for a democratic Union.

Her father was a supporter of the federal movements of the 1960s, in which Myanmar's ethnic minority representatives suggested amendments to the 1947 Constitution. Later, in the 1962 military coup, AFPFL ministers and active ethnic leaders from the Shan, Kachin, Karenni, Karen and Chin communities were, among others, arrested.

Nan Khin Htwe Myint's own family became targets for persecution under the military regime.

A strong believer that women are highly capable of coping with challenges, she has urged other women to increase their participation in politics and current affairs.

"We, as women, should never feel nor think that we are weak and cannot do things like others can. I want every woman to think that we can keep abreast of everything," she told The Irrawaddy earlier this year.

– By Nyein Nyein 

Dr. Cynthia Maung and Daw Aye Aye Mar: Those Who Bridged the Border

Often referred to as Myanmar's own Mother Teresa, Dr. Cynthia Maung has served as a source of strength for vulnerable communities on the Thai-Myanmar border, including migrant workers and ethnic minorities displaced by civil war.

In the aftermath of the 1988 pro-democracy demonstrations, Dr. Cynthia Maung left Karen State and opened a clinic in a dirt-floor building on the outskirts of Mae Sot, on the Thai side of the border. Today the Mae Tao Clinic she founded boasts a staff of 700 and sees more than 300 patients each month, treating a range of issues, from landmine injuries to facilitating safe childbirths to providing HIV counseling.

Today, Dr. Cynthia, as she is widely known, has been honored with dozens of humanitarian awards, and remains a powerful advocate for decentralized and community-based healthcare in Myanmar's ethnic states.

The renowned ethnic Karen physician has inspired many, including Daw Aye Aye Mar, the director of the Social Action for Women (SAW) Foundation, also based in Mae Sot. Following Dr. Cynthia's suggestion, she started with a safe house, in order to provide shelter to some of Mae Tao's patients and orphans, and then co-founded SAW in 2001, along with other 88-generation women, including Dr. Cynthia.

Daw Aye Aye Mar (Photo: SAW)

The organization provides shelter and 24-hour support to orphans, domestic violence and rape survivors, as well as trafficked women and their families. SAW has helped provide in-house care to nearly 300 women and children, runs a learning center, and facilitates health awareness trainings. Some 90 orphans from SAW's shelters receive formal education at Thai schools.

Daw Aye Aye Mar, now 48, had been involved in Myanmar's democracy movement since 1988, and was detained in the notorious Insein Prison for one month in 1989. She left her home in March 1990 and joined the once-outlawed student army, known as the All Burma Students' Democratic Front.

She also has had a career as a radio broadcast reporter for 19 years, with the Democratic Voice of Burma, then Radio Free Asia, and Voice of America's Burmese service. She became particularly involved in documenting the plight of female migrant workers.

The political transition over the past five years has contributed to major funding cuts in cross-border aid and has forced many community-based groups on the Thai border to return to Myanmar. Despite financial difficulties and security challenges, migration patterns persist, and Daw Aye Aye Mar continues to provide social services to women and children, just as Mae Tao Clinic founder Dr. Cynthia continues to offer lifesaving healthcare support.

– By Nyein Nyein 

 

Ma Phyoe Phyoe Aung with student protesters at the standoff in front of a monastery in Letpadan March 3. 2015. ( Photo: JPaing / The Irrawaddy)

Ma Phyoe Phyoe Aung: The Next Generation

Having been born in August 1988 at the height of student-led democracy movement, Ma Phyoe Phyoe Aung said she feels "close" to the struggle.

"It can't be separated from me," she told The Irrawaddy earlier this month, adding that it is important to remember the people's power, unity, and struggle for democracy associated with that era. These events, she explained, helped to create her own political commitment a generation later.

Ma Phyoe Phyoe Aung was an active leader of the All Burma Federation of Student Unions (ABFSU) organizing committee from 2007 and until November 2016.

She was detained in June 2008 with her father U Nay Win for helping to bury the dead who were scattered after Cyclone Nargis hit the Irrawaddy Delta region in May, killing more than 140,000 people. She was imprisoned for four years after a closed trial in 2009, in which she was charged under sections 6, 7 and 505(b) of the country's Penal Code, accused of forming an illegal organization, contacting unlawful groups and "intent to commit an offense against the State."

Ma Phyoe Phyoe Aung faced a trial and another jail term of 13-months for her involvement in nationwide protests against the national education law in March 2015. She was released in April 2016. She remained a member of the National Network for Education Reform (NNER) and said she would continue pursuing change in the sector.

She is also a 2014 alumnus of the George W. Bush Institute's Liberty and Leadership Forum in the United States.

As the ABFSU elected new leadership in Nov. 2016, she no longer possesses official responsibilities with the organization.

Now a mother of a five-month-old son, she is dedicating her time to her family while contributing to a youth capacity building school called the "Wings Institute," cofounded by ABFSU colleagues. Her work focuses on peace building and reconciliation, and discussions of federalism and transitional justice.

– By Nyein Nyein 

The post The Women of 1988 appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

Revolutionary Paintings Tell Myanmar’s Story

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 12:32 AM PDT

YANGON — For years, Myanmar lived under dictatorship and authoritarianism. But for artist Thoe Hteine, Myanmar has never been a victim of oppression, rather it is a society of revolution.

An ongoing exhibition at the Bo Aung Kyaw Art Gallery on Bo Aung Kyaw Street reflects his perspective of the country. Titled S8it, the exhibition features the works of eight artists, including Thoe Hteine, until Tuesday, priced between US$100 and $1,000.

Thoe Hteine, a 37-year-old artist from Yangon, was mentored by Myanmar's influential contemporary artist Kin Maung Yin.

He is showcasing a series of eight paintings at the exhibition which he says "tell a story" of Myanmar's revolutionary attitude.

The first painting depicts a chair in an old, cobwebbed room. A chair is a metaphor for the position of power in Burmese language, and the painting shows a dictator who is unwilling to leave his "chair."

The second painting shows a prisoner in shackles and a newborn baby. "Despite the fact that [dissidents] are arrested, the new generation of revolutionaries continues to emerge," said Thoe Hteine.

The third shows poisonous snakes watching a tied Pyit Taung Htaung or Tumbling Kelly—a traditional Myanmar toy figure that wobbles, but always returns to an upright position.

The fourth painting depicts a pinball machine, which the artist compares to Insein Prison. "There are ups and downs, and entry and departure in a revolution," he said.

"The ball will get in when the player pushes it in, but it will find its way out. But then, the player will push the ball in again. So, the ball gets in and gets out in an unending circle," the artist said, comparing it to the prison life of so-called dissidents.

The fifth painting shows people protecting themselves rather than being protected by the police while the sixth exhibits the flags of victory in spite of oppression.

A painting titled "The Last Hope—The Last Drop of Water" comes from Thoe Hteine's belief that there is one hope left for Myanmar's 50 million people in search of democracy. "We need to drink, when there is only one drop of water left," the painting reads.

The final painting shows Myanmar society engaged in a revolution under a vigorous fighting peacock. "Myanmar has been a revolutionary country all the way. But it is mainly the fighting peacock that fought the revolution since the struggle for independence," he said.

The other artists featured in the exhibition are: Ang Banang, Ba G, Han Sann, Lwin Oo Maung, Myint Soe Oo, Thu Myat, Wunna Aung.

The post Revolutionary Paintings Tell Myanmar's Story appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

How Can Burma Begin to Heal the Scars of ‘88?

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 08:00 PM PDT

Phone Maw was the first of thousands of martyrs killed during the military crackdown of the '88 uprising.

Twenty-five years after the crackdown on the pro-democracy movement began, this piece, in 2013, demands an answer to the still salient question: who were really responsible for ordering the deaths?

YANGON — On March 13, 1988 Phone Maw was gunned down by government security forces in a compound of Rangoon Institute of Technology (RIT). The 21-year-old engineering student became the first martyr among an estimated 3,000 people killed when the so-called 8888 pro-democracy uprising was brutally crushed by the military regime.

The incident in Burma's history is commemorated by opposition politicians and rights activists as the county's national Human Rights Day, also known as Phone Maw Day. There are religious and political ceremonies held to mark the slaying of the student. But the question remains: who were really responsible for ordering the killing of Phone Maw and thousands of others in 1988?

"Until now, there is no proper investigation in Phone Maw's case. We still want the government to take action," says Myo Win, a friend of Phone Maw in the RIT, who is now Vice Chairman of All Burma Students' Democratic Front, a dissident political group founded on the Thailand-Burma border after the '88 uprising.

Such demands for an official investigation into the former junta's wrongdoing come not only from political activists but also from human rights lawyers.

"They must respond to the crimes committed by the former junta," said Min Lwin Oo, a Burmese lawyer at Hong Kong-based Asia Human Rights Commission. "But it is not easy at the moment. There are no signs of interest [in an investigation] from the government and neither from the opposition, activists and any other stakeholders," the lawyer said.

The UN Special Rapporteur on Human Rights in Burma Tomas Ojea Quintana said accountability for decades of rights violations is crucial for healing the wounds in Burmese society and to solidify the country's reforms, according to a Reuters' report on a UN human rights meeting in Geneva.

But he said, "This is not on the agenda of any of the stakeholders. It's not on the government agenda, it's not on the other political parties' agenda and it's not on the ethnic minority groups' agenda."

Soe Thein, a Minister of the President's Office, addressed the issue in Oslo, Norway, during President Thein Sein trip to Europe in late February. "We don't want to put this agenda in the priority lists while we are heading for democracy," he said. "If you make it a priority the speed of our journey may be delayed. So let's think about it later," he warned.

When the military drafted the controversial Constitution in 2008 it included article 445, which provides immunity for all acts taken by members of the previous military government councils. "No proceeding shall be instituted against the said Councils or any member there of or any member of the Government, in respect of any act done in the execution of their respective duties," it states.

And so, is there then no way to hold former junta officials responsible for the crimes they committed? Perhaps Burma needs to follow a South Africa-style Truth and Reconciliation Commission?

This commission invited victims of rights abuses under the former apartheid-regime to give statements about their experiences. Perpetrators of violence could also testify and request amnesty from prosecution.

South African Nobel Peace Prize winner Desmond Tutu, who played an important role in the successful truth and reconciliation process, visited Rangoon recently. He met with opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi, 88- Generation Students activist Min Ko Naing and former political prisoners to explain his experience.

But so far, neither the government nor opposition politicians have reacted to his suggestion.

In this situation, what can activists do to hold a meaningful commemoration of Phone Maw and the 3,000 '88 martyrs at tomorrow's ceremony? Can they just pray for them to rest in peace? Can they just recall the memory of '88 uprising?

This activity is not new. Burma's exile community has marked Phone Maw Day for many years and last year, for the first time in decades, activists commemorated this event in Burma.

However, this year would be the first time that it will be held in Burma in open view of the government, which is led reformist President Thein Sein who has welcomed Suu Kyi into Burma's military-dominated Parliament.

At this year's ceremony the activists should discuss whether they want to push for prosecution of crimes committed against the '88 martyrs, or whether they want Burma to organize a truth and reconciliation commission to address the abuses.

Secondly, the activists should rebuild the monument for Phone Maw, which the students built the day after he was killed in the RIT compound. It was later destroyed by the army. If the authority will not allow it to be rebuild the activists should explain that the monument is needed to help heal the emotional wounds of the surviving '88 victims and their families.

Thirdly, they should urge the government to allow for the construction of monuments for the victims of the '88 uprising who were killed in Burma's other states and divisions in March, June, August and September 1988.

The government and Parliament should at least allow these monuments to be erected in order to provide an initial source of solace for the uprising's victims, before it is decided how to officially address the gross rights violations of 1988.

It would also be a good sign if the government could send some officials to tomorrow's commemoration event in order to pay their respects to Phone Maw and other 88 martyrs, and to meet with their families.

These initial steps should not delay Burma's important journey to democracy, but should be part of a larger effort to implement speedy democratic reforms and reconcile the country. Providing treatment and support for the victims of the Burmese government's past abuses is an important part of any reconciliation plan.

Htet Aung Kyaw is a former student activist who fled to Burma's ethnic rebel-controlled areas in 1988. He is now a freelance journalist.

The post How Can Burma Begin to Heal the Scars of '88? appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

An Unsung ’88 Hero Gets His Due

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 07:26 PM PDT

This month marks the 29th anniversary of the nationwide protests in 1988 that launched Myanmar's pro-democracy movement. For four months that year, and at great personal risk, U Nay Min served as an unofficial stringer supplying information about the ongoing protests and government crackdowns to foreign journalists. In commemoration of his contribution to the struggle, the The Irrawaddy revisits a profile of U Nay Min published in 2014.

RANGOON — To an old telephone at his home in Rangoon, for four months he received four calls a day, at specified times. Already knowing who was on the other end of the line, Nay Min picked up the receiver to dictate information that he had from newsgathering in a country hardly welcoming of such activities. Outside, students were staging protests against the government of Gen. Ne Win and his heavy-handed tactics to suppress their pro-democracy demonstrations. It was late July, 1988.

For all his efforts to inform the world about demonstrations that would culminate in a nationwide protest known as the "8888 Uprising" on Aug. 8, 1988, Nay Min is not among the canonized pro-democracy crusaders who helped topple Burma's single-party rule system more than 25 years ago.

"At that time, I had to keep my identity secret for fear of government retribution," the 68-year-old told The Irrawaddy. "Plus, I feel embarrassed to say, 'You see, that's what I did.'"

But his preference for anonymity suddenly came to an end during a panel discussion at the East-West Center International Media Conference in Rangoon on Monday, when he was surprised by a trio of fellow journalists who honored him with a certificate recognizing his courage and conviction in 1988. For four months that year, and at great personal risk, Nay Min served as an unofficial stringer supplying information about the ongoing protests and government crackdowns to Christopher Gunness from the BBC's World Service, who was based in neighboring Bangladesh as an international correspondent.

Veteran journalist Bertil Lintner, who writes extensively about Burma and was one of the three journalists who honored Nay Min this week, told The Irrawaddy that he felt the Burmese who supplied news from within the country to journalists on the outside should be remembered and honored.

"We would not have been able to do our job without their support," Lintner said. "U Nay Min was the one who had to suffer the most because of the job he did, therefore we wanted to honor him and the work he did."

Back in 1988, Burma was known as one of the most reclusive countries in the world, and press freedom was nonexistent. Foreign journalists were barred from entering the country.

As much of the outside world remained in the dark on happenings in Burma, public discontent over the regime's mismanagement of the national economy was mounting. University students took to the streets en masse and were brutally suppressed.

"The country's situation at that time was on the brink of explosion," Nay Min recalled.

Trained as a lawyer, Nay Min found himself in early months of 1988 serving as a volunteer advocate for students unlawfully arrested by the regime for their participation in anti-government protests. He had no journalism background, but showed an uncommon aptitude for newsgathering—and discretion.

"U Nay Min is also a man of great integrity and would often say, 'I heard this, but don't use it until I have checked it,'" the BBC's Gunness told The Irrawaddy.

As anti-government protests gathered steam in late July, Nay Min was contacted by Gunness and managed to send information to him via a land-line telephone. Prior to Aug. 8, and based on Nay Min's work, the BBC reported that there would be a nationwide demonstration against the Ne Win regime on that fateful day, and the predicted protest came to fruition.

As a result, more and more people in Burma tuned into the BBC to glean the latest information on the protest movement. Nay Min even got a personal call from Aung San Suu Kyi, who rang him to clarify rumors that she was leading protests on the streets of Rangoon.

"She told me, 'Please say in your report that I'm not taking part in the protests,'" he remembered.

Gunness acknowledged that Nay Min's eyes and ears on the ground in Rangoon a quarter-century ago were "pivotal" to the BBC reports closely followed by the Burmese audience in 1988.

"When I was in Burma in August [for the Silver Jubilee celebration of the 8888 Uprising last year] people kept telling me about my own role, but the true hero of 1988 is U Nay Min," he told The Irrawaddy in an email.

"Of course there were many students and activists of all ages who were brave beyond imagination, but U Nay Min's role was pivotal, as I told journalists and others repeatedly when I was in Burma and as I now say again," the former BBC correspondent said.

But when the government staged a bloody crackdown on demonstrators on the night of Aug. 8 in downtown Rangoon, Nay Min said he faced a moment of deep moral uncertainty.

"When I learned about the crackdown, I broke into tears as I felt guilty because it was me who broke the news that there would be a huge protest on that day," he said.

"If I hadn't said anything, people wouldn't have known and they wouldn't have joined it."

For his reporting he was arrested twice, spending 16 years in prison and suffering severe torture at the hands of authorities. During stints in solidarity confinement, he slept on a concrete floor and used a plate as a pillow.

"I no longer have my molars. They are gone not because of my old age but because of interrogation sessions I went through," he said.

These days, in his late 60s, Nay Min spends most of his time meditating, and said he holds no grudge against the former military government for what its leaders did to him. But, like most other former political prisoners, he insisted that "the military government has to admit to their wrongdoing."

Asked to consider the ethics and impact of his actions nearly 26 years ago, he said he believed he had done the right thing, helping to show the world what was happening inside Burma and contributing to the country's transition from single- to multi-party rule.

"Nobody can deny that the single-party rule was toppled by the 88 Uprising," he said.

And all these years later, is Nay Min pleased with Burma's political landscape today?

"No. So far we've only got what the government wants to give, from political prisoners' [release] to constitutional amendment issues. It's quite despairing."

The post An Unsung '88 Hero Gets His Due appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

The Heroic Medics of the 8888 Uprising

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 06:27 PM PDT

Twenty-nine years ago, demonstrations across Myanmar (then Burma) demanded an end to Gen Ne Win's military dictatorship. After government troops opened fire on the 8888 Uprising in Yangon (then Rangoon), hundreds were seriously injured. Many doctors and nurses worked around the clock to save the injured.

Win Maw Oo is remembered from the iconic picture of a blood-soaked young woman being carried away by two medics during the 1988 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Yangon. She begged her father not to perform the Buddhist last rites until "Burma enjoys democracy." In May 2016, those funerary rites were performed, after Daw Aung San Suu Kyi's National League for Democracy party assumed power.

YANGON — Twenty five years ago, the streets of Rangoon swelled with hundreds of thousands of protestors demanding an end to Burma's military dictatorship. After government troops opened fire on them, hundreds were seriously injured. Many would have died if it had not been for Dr Myat Htoo Razak and Dr Win Zaw.

Like many doctors and nurses, the young house surgeon and medical student worked around the clock to save the lives of injured protestors during the hectic days of the 8888 Uprising.

Myat Htoo Razak recalled the unforgettable scenes that he witnessed on August 9, 1988, one day after popular, nationwide pro-democracy demonstrations started in Rangoon and other cities across Burma.

"Some of them were shot in their chests, arms and legs," he said in a recent interview with The Irrawaddy. "Two of them were seriously injured; one was shot in his head and another one shot in his eye."

The then 24-year-old house surgeon and his team had arrived at the Maternal and Child Welfare Association in Rangoon's North Okkalapa Township shortly before troops began to fire on crowds of peaceful demonstrators, who had gathered nearby.

One monk who made a speech urging protestors to keep marching was fatally shot. Many protestors ran into the building to flee the gunfire, some were bleeding from bullet wounds in their torsos, arms and legs.

The medical team, which came from North Okkalapa Hospital, had already prepared emergency treatment facilities as they feared that authorities might launch a violent crackdown on the demonstrations. Myat Htoo Razak and three other house surgeons (young doctors who are still undergoing practical training) and nurses started treating the many wounded.

But soon, soldiers surrounded the Maternal and Child Welfare Association and two captains entered building to intimidate the demonstrators. "We just used rubber bullets. Or else, you would have all been dead," one of them said looking at injured protestors.

The captain's heartless words infuriated Myat Htoo Razak but he tried to cope with his anger for the sake of his patients. The would-be doctor then asked the officers to transport two seriously wounded patients to North Okkalapa Hospital.

In the meantime, more injured people were coming into the building. Myat Htoo Razak and his small team kept treating the injured until late afternoon. When he got back to North Okkalapa Hospital, the troops were shooting right in front of the building.

"We didn't even need to go too far to carry patients as they were shooting in front of the hospital. The injured people were just carried into the hospital. Inside, we treated many of the injured people," he said.

While the doctors like Myat Htoo Razak worked ceaselessly to operate on the many wounded, pools of blood covered the hospital floors and numerous bodies arrived at the mortuary. "It was a tragic scene to see the dead bodies of our brothers and sisters," he said.

For 10 days, government violence continued and wounded pro-democracy demonstrators filled the wards of hospitals and clinics in Rangoon and across Burma.

When Dr Maung Maung, a civilian, became interim president on August 19 the shootings ended and people from all walks of life joined the demonstrations, which had now spread nationwide, from Burma's big cities to tiny villages throughout the country.

On September 18, the military staged a coup d'état and the crackdown worsened. Troops shot down many more demonstrators, including schoolchildren, students, civil servants and housewives. An estimated total of 3,000 people were killed and many more protestors were injured in August and September of 1988.

For the injured, doctors, nurses and house surgeons like Myat Htoo Razak, provided life-saving care at a critical moment in the country's history.

The 88' pro-democracy movement was the biggest people power uprising that Burma had seen since gaining independence from Britain in 1948. It toppled the country's oppressive authoritarian regime of military strongman Ne Win and his Burma Socialist Programme Party, which had ruled the country for 26 years.

The military coup and subsequent crackdown on the 8888 Uprising, however, would leave the army in charge for two more decades.

Another medical student who helped treat Burma's brave protestors at the time was Win Zaw.

Doctors, nurses and medical staffs not only treated the injured, but also took part in the demonstrations, and 23-year-old Win Zaw joined a group of medical students who staged a hunger strike on September 18 at Rangoon's University of Medicine.

After the army staged a coup at 4 pm that day, it announced that all demonstrators should disperse and leave their camps and the streets.

Win Zaw and his fellow students went to Rangoon General Hospital and spent the night helping doctors in treating hundreds of demonstrators who had been shot by troops as they tried to clear the streets of Rangoon.

The next morning, at about 10:30 am, Win Zaw and doctors got news that the troops had again opened fire on protestors. Win Zaw quickly joined a small team that included a surgeon named Win Ko, two doctors and another house surgeon by the name of Dr Saw Lwin.

They drove through the streets collecting the wounded, putting as many as 15 patients into their small ambulance. After two runs to pick up the victims, they heard that shots had been fired at a demonstration near Sule Pagoda in central Rangoon

As they reached the pagoda, it became clear that the troops had committed a massacre.

"It is a scene that I can never forget for the rest of life. There were a lot of bodies and injured people on street," Win Zaw recalled in an interview. "A photo of our Bogyoke [Aung San] was on the street, our fighting peacock flag [the symbol of students' movement] was also down, sandals were scattered and pools of blood were everywhere."

As they looked among the numerous bodies for protestors who were still alive, Win Zaw noticed one young girl who was breathing faintly. He approached and heard her murmur, "Brother, help me."

Win Zaw lifted the girl by her arms while house surgeon Saw Lwin held her legs. Wearing white physician duty coats, they carried her to the nearby ambulance. At that time, he noticed a flash of a camera and heard one of the soldiers bellowing: "Don't take pictures! Or else, we'll shoot!"

At that time, Win Zaw had no idea the picture would become an internationally well-known, historic picture that symbolized just how brutal the army's crackdown on innocent protestors had been. Later, he found out that the young girl's name was Win Maw Oo, a 16-year-old high school student.

On that dark day, September 19, 1988, Win Zaw's team made seven runs to collect the wounded from Rangoon's blood-covered streets. Another ambulance team of Rangoon General Hospital conducted a similar number of emergency rescues.

By the evening, he learned Win Maw Oo was being treated at the intensive care unit and that she was still alive after having suffered gunshot wounds in one arm, one leg and a lung. At 5:35 pm, however, she died.

The medical staff also risked their lives by going out and collecting wounded protestors from Rangoon's streets. Myat Htoo Razak remembers that at least one medical student was shot and killed, while another required a life-saving operation.

Myat Htoo Razak and a senior surgeon, Dr Kyaw Myint Naing, operated on final-year medical student Moe Thu Win for six and a half hours after a bullet had shredded the main artery in his arm. The doctors thought they might have to amputate the limb, but eventually the operation was successful.

During 10 days of bloody repression in 1988, the doctors continuously treated injured protestors, although some of the wounded didn't dare to come to hospitals out of fear that the military would arrest them there.

For some medical staff, their work would have repercussions later. The military had taken note of Win Zaw and Saw Lwin after the photo of their rescue of the young girl Win Maw Oo became famous the world over.

Four years later, the notorious Military Intelligence's unit-6, better known as MI-6, detained Dr Win Zaw for five days and asked him about the details of the events of that day.

For his colleague Dr Saw Lwin the consequences would be far greater, however. The military authorities forced Saw Lwin's father to retire from his position as the director of a government department. This pressure on his family caused Saw Lwin to sink into a deep depression. Years later, he committed suicide.

Until this day, Win Zaw said, Saw Lwin's family cannot bear to watch the tragic picture of their rescue attempt.

For both Dr Win Zaw and Dr Myat Htoo Razak the events of 1988 were life defining moments, and all these years later both say they are still dedicated to establishing genuine democracy in Burma.

"The 88 uprising shaped our lives," said Myat Htoo Razak, who now lives in the United States and has worked on HIV/Aids research and strengthening health care systems in Asia and Africa.

Win Zaw, who is now secretary of the Myanmar Medical Association's General Practitioners Society, said, "In fact, we are still waiting to get what we demanded 25 years ago."

The post The Heroic Medics of the 8888 Uprising appeared first on The Irrawaddy.

National News

National News


Seeds sold at agricultural shops to be inspected

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:50 PM PDT

The sale of seeds will be controlled more tightly in Mandalay, warned the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation on August 1.

Mandalay vendors pledge not to sell dyed bamboo shoots

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:48 PM PDT

Mandalay vendors have pledged not to sell dyed bamboo shoots, amid concerns about the ill effects of dyed vegetables on human health, a Mandalay City Development Council (MCDC) official said.

Police hunt down two suspects in attempted money changer heist

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:45 PM PDT

Police have launched manhunt against two suspects who attempted to hold up a currency exchange shop in front of 9th Mile Ocean Center in Pyay Road in Mayangone township three days ago, the town police chief said Sunday.

ASEAN takes united stand on North Korea

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:41 PM PDT

ASEAN foreign ministers issued the strongest joint statement ever, expressing "grave concerns" over North Korea's continued missile tests.

Maungdaw Commission urges govrnment to act fast on Rakhine issue

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:38 PM PDT

The Maungdaw Investigation Commission on Sunday called on the government to take urgent actions and implement a long-term plan to address the Rakhine situation.

Government to conduct livestock census in January

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:35 PM PDT

The government will conduct a national-level livestock census in January of next year, said Dr Toe Min Tun, an official from the ministry of agriculture, livestock and irrigation.

Sit-in protesters sued under section 505(b)

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:30 PM PDT

Five laymen and eight monks, who led a sit-in protest camp in Mandalay, have been charged under Section 505 of the Penal Code for conducing public mischief, Mandalay Region authorities said.

Hundreds flee homes in Buthidaung, Rathedaung over attacks

Posted: 06 Aug 2017 01:22 PM PDT

Hundreds of residents in Buthidaung and Rathedaung have fled their homes due to the violent attacks by Bengalis on August 3, according to Rathedaung State Hluttaw MP U Oo Than Naing.

Shan Herald Agency for News

Shan Herald Agency for News


TOC ASIAN HIGHLANDS PERSPECTIVES #48 (2017)

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 03:33 AM PDT

Asian Highlands Perspectives is pleased to announce the publication of Volume 48: GREAT LORDS OF THE SKY: BURMA'S SHAN ARISTOCRACY by Sao Sanda Simms. Written from a Tai/Shan perspective, the intricate and often unsettled realities that existed in the Shan States from early times up to the military coup in 1962 are described in a comprehensive overview of the stresses and strains that the Shan princes endured from early periods of monarchs and wars, under British rule and Japanese occupation, and Independence and Bamar military regime. Part One covers chronological events relating them to the rulers, the antagonists, and the people and the continuing conflict in the Shan State. Part Two deals with the 34 Tai/Shan rulers, describing their histories, lives, and work. Included are photographs and family trees of the princes, revealing a span of Shan history, before being lost in the mists of time. The past is explained in order that the present political situations may be understood and resolved amicably between the Bamar government, the Tatmadaw, and the ethnic nationalities.
Volume 48 is available as a free download at: http://bit.ly/2vE3BuY

and can be purchased as an at-cost hardback at: http://bit.ly/2vsxyy7

Volume 48: GREAT LORDS OF THE SKY: BURMA'S SHAN ARISTOCRACY
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS <7>
CONTENTS <9>
THE AUTHOR <15>
MAPS <17>
§  Map 1: Political Divisions, Union of Burma, 1948 <17>
§  Map 2: Location of Shan States, 1939 <18>
§  Map 3: Resources of the Shan Plateau <19>
§  Map 4: Major Ethnic Groups of Burma <20>
PREFACE <21>
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT <23>
PART ONE: Background
Chapter One: The Early Period <26>
§  The Shan Plateau <26>
§  Migrations <27>
§  The Early Ava Court <28>
§  Differences <30>
§  Mutual Respect <32>
§  The Limbin Confederacy 1886 <33>
§  British Annexation <34>
§  Under the British 36<>
§  Changing Times <36>
Chapter Two: British Rule <41>
§  The Watershed 1922 <41>
§  Burma Round Table Conference 1931-1932<43>
§  Federated Council of Shan Chiefs <45>
§  The Feudal Lords <47>
§  The Privy Purse <48>
§  Contentment? <50>
§  Some Progress <51>
Chapter three: The Interim <58>
§  A Storm Approaches <58>
§  Enter the Japanese <58>
§  Japanese Occupation <60>
§  Distrust <63>
§  Return of the British <64>
§  SCOUHP 1946 <68>
§  Attlee-Aung San Treaty <69>
§  Anti-feudalists <70>
§  Namkham U Htun Aye <73>
Chapter Four: Panglong and After <77>
§  The Panglong Agreement of 1947 <77>
§  Committee of Inquiry 1947 <79>
§  Tragedy <80>
§  Constituent Assembly <81>
§  Selecting a President <82>
§  Insurgency <84>
Chapter Five: Ten Long Years <91>
§  Disenchantment <91>
§  To Secede or Not, 1958 <93>
§  Tatmadaw's Soft Approach <95>
§  The 1959 Abdications <96>
§  New Elections <97>
Chapter Six: Without Trust <103>
§  The Federal Proposal <103>
§  U Tun Myint <105>
§  No Compromise <107>
§  The Coup d'etat 1962 <110>
PART TWO: GUARDIANS OF THE SHAN PLATEAU
Chapter Seven: The Northern Shan States<121>
§  Hsipaw State <121>
o   Fate Unknown <121>
o   Hsipaw State<123>
o   The Saohpa Long <124>
o   Strained Relations <126>
o   Japanese Occupation <127>
o   The Tabaung Festivals <128>
§  Hsenwi State <140>
o   Hsenwi Saohpa Long <140>
o   Japanese Disapproval <141>
o   Flight to Safety <142>
o   Shan-Kachin <144>
o   Burma Road <145>
o   Dr. Gordon Seagrave (1897-1965) <146>
§  Mong Yai State <155>
o   A Kingdom Lost<155>
o   Hsenwi Divided<155>
§  Mong Mit State <164>
o   An Accomplished Prince <164>
o   The Saohpa Long <165>
o   Japanese Occupation <167>
o   Rubies <168>
o   Teak Forests <169>
§  Tawngpeng State <176>
o   The Palaung/Ta'ang <176>
o   Tawngpeng and its Saohpa <177>
o   The Namtu/Bawdwin Mines <180>
o   Not for Export <181>
o   Tea: a Drink or a Salad? <182>
o   An Episode <183>
Chapter Eight: The Eastern Shan States <193>
§  Kengtung State <193>
o   Largest Mong <193>
o   Mangrai Descendants <194>
o   Kengtung Saohpa Long <195>
o   Close Ties <197>
o   Tai Khun and Tai-Lu <198>
o   The Kuomintang (KMT) <199>
§  Mong Pan State <216>
§  Kokang State<219>
o   Into the Fold <219>
o   The House of Yang <220>
o   The Next Generation <221>
o   Jimmy Yang <222>
o   The New Order <224>
Chapter Nine: The Inner Shan States <233>
§  Isolation <233>
§  Mong Nai State <234>
o   Once Powerful<234>
o   Massacre<234>
§  Laikha State <242>
o   A Gracious Host <242>
o   A State of Many Names <243>
o   A Learned Abbot <245>
§  Mawkmai State <250>
o   A Charismatic Prince <250>
§  Mong Nawng/Mong Nong State <255>
o   Separated from Hsenwi <255>
o   Privy Purse<255>
§  Mong Kung State <262>
o   Appointed Saohpa in 1928 <262>
§  Mong Hsu State <271>
o   Actively Involved <271>
o   Mong Hsu Rubies <272>
§  Kesi Mansam State <274>
o   Warrior Princes <274>
o   Outstanding Career <276>
§  Tai Shan Resistance <282>
o   Noom Suk Harn <282>
o   The Golden Triangle <285>
Chapter ten: The Central Shan States <292>
§  Yawnghwe State <292>
o   The Saohpa Long <292>
o   Hands-tied <294>
o   Yawnghwe Founded in 1394 <295>
o   Enter the British <297>
o   Phaung Daw U Poy <299>
o   Inle Needs Saving <300>
§  Mong Pawn State <316>
o   An Able Statesman <316>
o   The Mong Pawn Dynasty <316>
o   The Kyemmong <318>
§  Hsahtung State<325>
o   Remarkable Prince <325>
o   Advocating Unity <326>
o   Untimely Death <328>
o   The Pa-O <328>
o   Restlessness <330>
§  Lawksawk State <337>
o   Saohpa of Stature <337>
o   Japanese Courtesy <338>
§  Samka State <345>
o   Ancient Samka <345>
o   A Devoted Buddhist <345>
§  Loi Long/Pinlaung State <352>
o   Mountainous Region <352>
o   Combating Insurgents <353>
§  Nawngmawn State <356>
o   Sao Htun Yin <357>
Namhkok State <359>
§  Wanyin/Banyin State <363>
§  Hopong State <364>
§  Sakoi State <367>
§  Mong Pai State <369>
o   Mong Pai Amalgamated <369>
o   Mobye Narapati<369>
§  Attempt at Progress <371>
Chapter Eleven: The Mye Lat States: The Middle Lands <373>
o   Experimental Stations <375>
§  Hsahmong Kham State <376>
o   Arrival of the Danu <376>
o   Defended the State <377>
o   Politically Involved <378>
§  Pangtara/Pindaya State <384>
o   Pindaya Caves <384>
o   Becomes Saohpa <385>
§  Baw State <391>
o   Baw le-hse-le-ywa <391>
o   An Important Link <391>
§  Pwehla State<394>
o   Rulers of Note<394>
o   Promoted a Jemadar <394>
§  Pangmi/Pinhmi State<399>
o   Head Prefect and Kyemmong <399>
§  Ywangan/Yengan State<405>
§  Kyong State<411>
Chapter Twelve: Sharing the Plateau<413>
§  The Two Wa States<413>
o   Introduction <413>
§  Mong Lun/Mong Lon State<415>
o   A Wise Ruler <415>
o   Eastern Special Region No. 4 <417>
§  Northern Wa States<419>
o   UWSP and UWSA<420>
§  The Karenni/Kayah State<421>
o   Three Karenni States <421>
o   Kantarawadi<423>
o   Bawlake<424>
o   Kyebogyi<425>
o   Becomes Kayah State <425>
o   Karenni's Wealth<427>
§  Diverse Communities<435>
o   Tribes and Kinships <435>
o   Troubled Relationships <436>
o   Akha <437>
o   Lahu <438>
o   Lisu <438>
o   Tai Neu <439>
o   Diversion <439>
o   Muong Sing to Luang Namtha <439>
o   First Encounter <440>
o   Tiger Women <442>
o   Sign Language <443>
o   A Holy Man <443>
EPILOGUE <450>
§  Presidency <450>
§  Panglong Agreement and Federalism <451>
§  Ethnic Issues <451>
§  Conclusion <453>
APPENDICES <454>
§  Appendix 1: The Panglong Agreement 1947 <455>
§  Appendix 2: Sao Harn Yawnghwe's Account <457>
§  Appendix 3: Sao Shwe Thaike's Letter, 1960 <463>
§  Appendix 4: Letter from Saohpa Sir Sao Mawng, 1926 <464>
§  Appendix 5: Letter Showing Shan Concern, 1947 <465>
TABLES <466>
§  Table 1: Land area and money: the Shan States in 1939 <467>
§  Table 2: Approximate dates of reigns of rulers from British Annexation in 1887 <469>
GLOSSARY 472
REFERENCES 474

All volumes of Asian Highlands Perspectives are open access and may be viewed/downloaded at

http://bit.ly/2mb4erq

Learning to share: Another story for our time

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 03:15 AM PDT

Last week, there was a discussion on whether the Union constitution adopted in 2008—by questionable means―should be amended or rewritten.

Nobody had asked them whether they wanted it amended or rewritten.

The answer, had the question been asked, would have been unanimous: they all wanted a new one.

In fact, the new one had already been drafted and adopted by the pro-democracy (and procedural) EAOs, political parties and activist groups on 12 February 2008, 3 months before the popular referendum, based on the 8 guiding principles endorsed 3 years earlier:

1.      Sovereign power derives from the people
2.      All the indigenous peoples of the Union enjoy equal rights, both political wise and ethnic wise
3.      All the indigenous peoples have right of self-determination in the fields of politics, economy, social and culture
4.      The Union must be formed with states that fully enjoy  the right of self determination
5.      The rights of all minorities that reside in the federal units are safeguarded by the constitution
6.      Fundamental human rights and rights must be guaranteed by the constitution without discrimination of religious beliefs, color, or gender
7.      The Union practices secularism
8.      The Union practices multiparty democratic system

Those who follow the country's ongoing peace process which began in 2011 will notice that all these guiding principles have now become an integral part of the basic federal principles to be negotiated and adopted at the Union Peace Conference (UPC) also known as the 21st Century Panglong (21CP).

However, what is not part of it is the draft they had adopted 9 years earlier, a situation which go against their grain.

Someone then brought the following story to the discussion:

A man is left in the desert by his friends who have robbed him of everything including his horse. Not giving up, he travels on foot, usually at night, to conserve the water in his body.

On the third day, chirping of birds in the distance draws him to a small pool among some desert willows. The only problem is a coyote, long dead, is lying there.

He knows he has to make a choice:

·         To drink it, he has to purify it as best he can first
·         To dig a new pool, for which he doesn't have enough strength unless he has something to drink first
·         Or to go further, which he knows well is out of the question unless he has a good supply of water

His decision, after consideration, is to go through all the three given options:
First, he drags the dead coyote out of the water. Then he gathers sticks and build a fire. He scoops up some water with the pot he is carrying, covers it with charcoal from the fire, and boils it again. When it has boiled, he skims off the scum from the surface, adds more charcoal, lets it boil again, and again skims it.

After it has cooled down, he allows himself the first real drink in three days. In this way, he soon has a small supply of water, which he drinks while emptying the poisoned water in the pool. By the next nights, it is full with clean water again.

Three days later, he is back to civilization.

"So what happens next? A cowboy story never ends like this," asked one of the participants.

The answer comes right back. "Of course, he has a showdown with his former friends, comes out on top, and takes back his possessions."

"That's what I want to hear," he says.

Maybe we can follow the same procedure this fictional character went through in dealing with the constitutional issue?

Something to think about.

Generals unveil drugs strategy

Posted: 07 Aug 2017 03:08 AM PDT

The military-controlled Ministry of Home Affairs claims it is making efforts to adopt an all-round drugs approach to tackle the problem.

Major General Aung Soe, the military-appointed deputy minister for home affairs, was asked by Lower House MP Dr Pyone representing Indaw Township what the generals were doing to control the drugs trade.



Aung Soe said: "Myanmar is facing drug problems like other nations. Successive governments have tried to eradicate narcotic drugs, but we still face practical challenges. Prevention and judicial strategies are not enough to solve drug problems. The economy, social affairs, health and development must be taken into consideration.

"The Central Committee for Drug Abuse Control formed 10 working committees representing different ministries. Moreover, the committees for drug abuse control were also formed across the country."

The police anti-drug squad consists of 3,994 officers but its current strength was 1,118 with plans being made to bring it up to full strength, Aung Soe said.

A road map on a new drug policy was adopted and tasks were being carried out in line with the strategy, Aung Soe said.

He said the military-controlled ministry was targeting Kachin State's drugs and jade trade. The general said greater cooperation with residents, police and administrators was needed.

Writer:  Nyein Zaw Lin + Myo Min Htet
Source : goo.gl/KVXPSH