Sunday, August 27, 2017

Shan Herald Agency for News

Shan Herald Agency for News


Commentary on “Security forces 'fire on fleeing Rohingya' as violence scorches Rakhine”

Posted: 27 Aug 2017 07:48 AM PDT

Looking at the human toll and causality figures of a hundred or more and is said to be increasing with every passing hours, the immediate need of the seemingly out of control conflict situation in Arakan as a whole is on how to first limit the damage.

All parties concerned in this conflict would be well advised to make use of the political dialogue and reconciliation attitude to defuse the situation, rather than just banking on total elimination of "win-lose" or zero-sum game.


At this confusing hours and attitude haof hatred from both sides of the conflict spectrum, just declaring Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA) as a terrorist organization and total annihilation won't end the conflict, as human rights violations and defending the country's sovereignty through area cleansing and combing of the Rohingya settlement, couldn't be delineated clearly. In other words, the line is blurred between the two issues.

Thus, "limiting the damage and political solution" are the only way to get out of this mess, even though it would be hard to swallow this reality at this emotionally charged moment that both conflict parties have the tendency to think that one side is wrong and the other side right, so to speak.

As in all conflict situation, the middle ground is always the place where solution could be found, as all Rohingya could not claim blanket citizenship for all, including illegal immigrants that have entered the country after the country's independence from the British – as a timeline for example to draw a line between legal and illegal, the powers that be cannot also throw the whole Rohingya population into the sea.

As Kofi Annan's Commission suggested reviewing the controversial 1982 citizenship law and verification of the legal resident from illegal ones would have to be carried out in an internationally accepted democratic norms, if this simmering conflict is to come to an end.

Link to the story: Security forces 'fire on fleeing Rohingya' as violence scorches Rakhine

BURMA: A NEW ETHNIC NATIONALITY PRO-DEMOCRACY RESISTANCE

Posted: 27 Aug 2017 07:38 AM PDT

Bigotry, the conviction that a group bears collective guilt for a perceived offense, can have many foundations. These include differences in skin color, ethnicity, and religious belief. For the last, the nature of the actual belief system is irrelevant. That others think differently is enough to justify persecution against them.

Presently, there is widespread bias against Muslims. While it is true that certain fanatical cults such as ISIS and al Qaeda self-identify as Muslim (and which self-identification is false, even though they - supposedly - follow the Koran), this in no way implicates all Muslims.


With a population over 1.5 billion, one out of five people on earth practice the faith. To think that all of them are fanatics is not only ludicrous, it is the most pervasive form of bigotry in the world today - other than on the basis of skin color.

There are many types of terrorism. There is the terrorism of cults such as ISIS, and on the opposite end of the spectrum the terrorism of right-wing extremists, who typically act as "lone-wolves," including followers of neo-Nazism, the Klu Klux Klan, and more generally who identify as white supremacists and anti-Semites.

The worst terrorists of all, though, who generate the most fear, and who perpetrate crimes against humanity against the largest number of victims, are state actors. In this group would go the dictators of such countries as North Korea, Syria, China and Burma, who terrorize their populations every day and who have been doing so for many decades. Anyone who opposes in self-defense such state terrorism, and who limits their actions to armed rebellion against state agents, but not civilians - innocent targets, is a pro-democracy rebel, not a terrorist.

For Islam, the United States clearly does not consider every Muslim to be a terrorist. Many are in fact allies. U.S. soldiers from Special Forces up to larger units from the Army and Marines and also the Navy and Air Force are presently fighting side-by-side with anti-terror/pro-democracy Muslims in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, Libya, Somalia, Yemen and likely other countries as well. The U.S. also has bases in additional Muslim countries, including Kuwait, Djibouti, Qatar and Turkey.

The situation at the moment in Burma is very unusual. The regime's military and police are State perpetrators of terrorism. This has gone on for over fifty years, notably in the East and North of the country. Since 2012, there has been a State campaign of terror in the West, against the  small Muslim group, the Rohingya. The Rohingya have been terrorized so severely that they are experiencing nothing less than genocide.

Historically a peaceful people, now - one might say finally - they are beginning to stand up for themselves. They have established a self-defense unit, the Arakan Rohingya Salvation Army (ARSA). This group is essentially the same as the KIA, KNLA, TNLA, and Burma's myriad other ethnic armed organizations (and should likewise be invited to participate in the nationwide peace negotiations).

The military dictatorship is dominated by Buddhists from the ethnic group, the Burmans. (By no means are all Burmans racist.) The dictatorship hates Muslims, and has been slaughtering the Rohingya. It calls the ARSA "terrorists" (and also the EAOs that are active in Shan and Kachin
 States). The generals have been helped greatly in this propaganda through the words and actions of Aung San Suu Kyi, also a Burman Buddhist, who while formerly a democracy campaigner herself has now abandoned fundamental political change and indeed the idea of having any moral foundation at all, in her quest for personal power and self-gratification.

The United States has been put in a difficult position. It has opposed the Burma dictatorship since its bloody massacre of students and other activists in 1988, and supported Suu Kyi who came on the scene at that time. Now, both are bad, partners in crime. What will the U.S. do? Will it actually begin to cooperate with the military regime, and assist the genocide, out of loyalty to Suu Kyi; or, will it condemn the terror against the Rohingya and even potentially begin to help its, and the country's other, ethnic nationality pro-democracy armed groups?

If it is doing this in Syria and Iraq, why not Burma?

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.