Wednesday, December 4, 2013

Shan Herald Agency for News

Shan Herald Agency for News


Paper: Political guarantees needed before nationwide ceasefire

Posted: 04 Dec 2013 06:54 AM PST

A briefing paper that came out late October has recommended that political guarantees are necessary "before permanent ceasefire and a nationwide peace can truly be declared."

The 20 page paper, jointly published by Transnational Institute (TNI) and Burma Centrum Nederland (BCN), was distributed at a quiet seminar in Bangkok held last month.
tni-square-logo
Transnational Institute's logo (TNI)

"There have been too many disappointments and injustices in Burma's past for simple optimism now," reads its page-2.

The suggestion coincided with the 11 point common position by the ethnic armed organizations at the 30 October-2 November Laiza conference, that had called for, among others:
  • Adherence to the Panglong Agreement signed in 1947 that had united the then lowland Burma with the then Frontier Areas
  • Convening a national conference based on the spirit and principles of Panglong
  • Ratification and implementation of the accord reached (at the national conference)
Naypyitaw meanwhile had come up with a draft ceasefire agreement that required, among others, the non-Burman armed opposition to uphold its "3 national causes": Non-disintegration of the Union, Non-disintegration of national Solidarity and Perpetuation of the national sovereignty.
bcn-logo
Burma Centrum Nederland' logo (BCN)

The two sides are due to meet in Karen State's Pa-an this month.
Five key elements outlined by the paper are:
  • Nationwide peace and an end to the practice of Separate arrangements
  • Extra parliamentary as well as parliamentary processes to ensure national inclusion
  • A political agreement — or, at the very least, political guarantees — before permanent ceasefires and nationwide peace can truly be declared
  • Transparent and inclusive political talks to make the agreements binding
  • International observation at key stages to ensure that agreements are adhered to by different sides
Burma's Ethnic Challenge: From Aspirations to Solutions can be read in www.tni.org/work-area/burma-project.

Pi Mai Tai or Shan New Year in UK

Posted: 04 Dec 2013 06:53 AM PST

The pictures of Pi Mai Tai or Shan New Year in UK, organized by Shan Cultural Association - UK (SCA-UK), held on 24 November 2013.
UK Shan new year 2108 001
UK Shan new year 2108 002
UK Shan new year 2108 003
UK Shan new year 2108 004
UK Shan new year 2108 005
UK Shan new year 2108 006
UK Shan new year 2108 007

Past, Present and Future of the Tai Yai/ Shan People

Posted: 04 Dec 2013 06:51 AM PST

A Personal View

Nel Adams alias Sao Noan Oo, B.Sc. Hons. MSc (Biology. 1949-1959, University of Rangoon, author of My Vanished World, 2000)

Ancient Past

The history of ethnic TAI has been widely studied and argued over during the past century. It is well known that the TAI underwent many migrations before they finally settled in their homelands, but no one has been able to put a finger on the exact manner how this really happened (Sao Saimong, 1956).

Where do the Proto-Tai come from we ask again and again? According to the Philologist, Max Muller, the Tai came from Central Mongolia and arrived in China by crossing over the Altai Mountain ranges. Professor Terrein de Lacouperie suggested that the cradle of the Tai could be in the Kun-lun Shan valley.

I looked for Kun-lun on the map, and found its position. Knowing that most Tai in the Shan States live along the river valleys of Nam Khong and its many tributaries, I traced its course on the same map and found that it has its source in the Province of Qinghai, where the Kun-lun valley is also situated. To my surprise the other three rivers the Lan Caing (Mei Kawng), Yangtse and the Hawngho also begin here.

‘Learning’ old dogs new tricks: How one can become more than a Shan

Posted: 04 Dec 2013 06:50 AM PST

My late American friend used to tell me: It's hard to 'learn' old dogs new tricks.

What he said is still true today. But it doesn't mean old people like us should give up learning. We may be slow but the fact is that nothing can get in the way of persistence.

I found that out during the 3-days I was with young people attending a workshop on federalism last week.

tiger-as-editor
Asked what my expectations were, I told the workshop I was looking for an answer to my ever recurring bee in the bonnet:

In a federal country, I've been informed that a person has at least two identities: his/her born ethnicity and being part of the whole union. For example, a friend I know who's born of Chinese parents in the United States feels, looks and acts Chinese in several ways but at the same time his general outlook and spirit are American, as he himself unabashedly admits. Moreover, he feels comfortable living a twin existence.

On the contrary, we in Burma don't have that kind of dual identity. If one is Shan, he/she is just that, no less no more. The same goes for Karen, Mon, Chin and others.

Burmans (Bamars or Burmese) may think they have it. However, instilled with the notion that this country is a Union of the Burmans, whoever feels differently, to them, is disloyal to both the Burmans and the Union.

So how do we do to become more than being Shans, Karens, Burmans etc? Tireless indoctrinations that our common identity is Myanmar obviously doesn't work. Because to all non-Burmans, Bamar and Myanmar are synonymous, like calling an Indian "Babuji" and a Chinese "Paukhpaw".

What I found out at the workshop was like light from a lighthouse during a dark and stormy night. It grabbed at what had been in the back of my mind by the collars and put it on the table for all to see.

Of course, the resource persons used fancy words like "accommodating" non-Burmans' aspirations but also "celebrating" them. But the well-phrased dictum "Self rule, Shared rule" was enough for me.

To live a twin existence in Burma, non-Burmans should not be satisfied with "self rule". They must also call for and work for "shared rule".

The Burmans must also be ready to allow the non-Burmans to take a share in the rule of the country. As long as there are only Burmans in the driving seat, they cannot expect their Three Main National Causes to become more than just slogans.

What is more, the principle of "self rule" and "shared rule" should be taught in schools, both primary and higher learning. It goes without saying that the present education system that enshrines Burman supremacy should be overhauled, that is, if they really want the Three Main Causes to come into life.

I take this opportunity to thank the resource persons and the facilitators who say they are happy to just remain out of the limelight for the time being. Rest assured we'll remember you when we reach the shore.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.